LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22   Report Post  
Old December 16th 11, 06:13 PM posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2011
Posts: 87
Default Building a new shortwave tube radio

On 12/16/2011 12:39 AM, flipper wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:21:58 -0800, John
wrote:

On 12/2/2011 7:06 PM, flipper wrote:

...
Bottom line, for the performance/cost ratio you can't beat solid state
and a robot assembling the stuff at warp speed. And it can be done so
cheaply you're better off to chuck it and buy another one assembled at
warp speed.




NT


Yeah, like computers.


Actually, no, and that was the point. They're not 'like computers'.
...


You are gravely mistaken, top of the line contain a CPU, PLL freq
control, dynamic and static data storage (RAM & harddrive), etc., or are
simply computer controlled through USB ... indeed, they only need be a
card on the motherboard of computer ...

But I wouldn't if, like the 'modular TV' brought up elsewhere (or a
radio), each of the 'modular parts' cost darn near as much as the
whole thing. Or, put the other way, I wouldn't if I could buy a
'whole' new one for only a little more than the cost of a hard drive.


Yeah, that is the part which need fixed ...

Modularized radio and you could have dozens of audio boards, low to high
end audio, right up to HD ... new dials, new readouts, new 3.0 USB
interface to a computer, etc.


If you're going to replace all that you might as well save the
interface crap and stuff the rest of the parts for a whole radio.


No, a simple receiver only need be a card in my computer, or a USB
dongle --albeit might be a large one.

Not to mention there's no reason to 'right up to' HD when the detector
isn't and the band isn't either. So you have to change all that, which
is a whole blooming radio.


I was talking HD screens on TVs ...

No, modular radio simply would be best for consumer and bad for
manufacturers ... who like very proprietary systems ...


"Like a computer," eh?

they would
scream at having to attempt with a generic radio platform which could be
just am or any combination right up to microwave bands ...


Ah yes, the good ole 'industry conspiracy' crap.

But, you did manage to mention the real truth of why it is not demanded
by consumers ... consumers are simply too stoopid to realize the
benefits and ask for them ... end of story.


I can see you're not going to be in the sales department.

Regards,
JS


Sounds like you suffer "brand loyalty" and proprietary thinking ... what
I am pointing out needs changed ...

Regards,
JS
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WWRB shortwave : Our You tube video: The Four Course Radio Range radio stationWWRB Shortwave 1 May 9th 10 03:01 PM
everyone better be careful while building those shortwave radios [email protected] Shortwave 9 April 14th 08 09:50 PM
Building a Multi-Element 1/4 Wave Length Shortwave Listening (SWL) Antenna RHF Shortwave 0 August 12th 07 05:24 AM
Classic Shortwave Antenna for a Classic {Tube} Shortwave Radio / Receiver RHF Shortwave 13 May 1st 06 07:22 AM
Better hold on to your shortwave TUBE radio radioman390 Shortwave 25 May 2nd 05 01:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017