Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 11, 7:09*am, sms88 wrote:
On 1/10/2012 9:29 PM, MotoFox wrote: And it came to pass that Richard Evans delivered the following message unto the people, saying~ Actually I'm not sure, but in the past there have been broadcasts in foreign countries, at up to 320k, and never at any bit rate higher than that. Also I thought the limit for mp2 was 320k, but I might be wrong about that. MP3 tops out at 320k. MP2 tops out at 384; sample rates, 32000-48000 Hz.. I don't believe MP3 is used over the air, but it is widely used for Internet audio streams. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-1_...nical_specific... (Oh yeah, and MP3 can't claim to have won an Emmy....) LOL. In the real world of radio what matters in terms of audio quality is what radio listeners perceive. There have been extensive tests comparing perceived audio quality of the different digital sources. The iBiquity codec is based upon the AAC+ (HE-AAC) codec. "Scientific testing by the European Broadcasting Union has indicated that HE-AAC at 48 kbit/s was ranked as "Excellent" quality using the *MUSHRA scale.[8] MP3 in the same testing received a score less than half that of HE-AAC and was ranked "Poor" using the MUSHRA scale. Data from this testing also indicated that some individuals confused 48 kbit/s encoded material with an uncompressed original." Look at figure 9 at http://www.ebu.ch/fr/technical/trev/trev_305-moser.pdf. Also read http://www.nrscstandards.org/Reports%20ref%20docs/iBiquity%20Gen%203%.... You can see where "near CD quality" came from in figure 3.2. As that report shows, the big problem with analog radio, is in impaired conditions. Unimpaired, some analog radio was only a bit below the quality of digital. Impaired, digital fared far better than analog because of the multipath on FM analog. Of course the big problem is that in impaired conditions, at 10% power, it would be difficult to even receive the HD signal. That's why it's so important for radio stations to increase their digital power. Where we need to move to is FM HD Radio in pure digital at higher power. It's the best transition to digital (at least the best one that anyone has come up with), that preserves the present FM band during the transition. It's time for the FCC to set some dates. The consumer electronics industry has made a huge commitment to digital radio, as evidenced by this years CES. Now it's the broadcasters turn to take advantage of the increased penetration of digital receivers, and increase power levels. The stations that have not yet added digital service need to get with the program as well. A Noisy Car/Trunk driving on a Road is not exactly the best environment to judge Audio 'quality' in. IBOC will become accepted {Standard} when the FCC Mandates that all new AM/FM Radios built for the US Market are IBOC Compliant and have Plug-N-Pay SAT Radio built-in. ~ RHF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Struble on Zune HD: "But in many ways, it did more for HD Radio thanhad been hoped." LMFAO!!! | Shortwave | |||
NRA Flip-Flops -FAUX plays the "brown note" & the Stupid buyguns? | Shortwave | |||
NRA Flip-Flops -FAUX plays the "brown note" & the Stupid buy guns? | Shortwave | |||
NRA Flip-Flops -FAUX plays the "brownnote" & the Stupid buy ... | Shortwave | |||
"Screw you HD radio" LMFAO! | Shortwave |