Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 12th 12, 06:51 PM posted to ba.broadcast,alt.radio.digital,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2010
Posts: 28
Default Fox News 2012: HD Radio one of "The Biggest CES Flops of AllTime" LMFAO!!!!!!!!!

On 1/12/12 5:40 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:52:47 +0100, hwh
wrote:

On 1/12/12 8:10 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
Incidentally, there's another nightmare pending, that oddly involves
yet another potential source of GPS interference. In EU, the official
future all digital broadcast band is 1452 to 1492 MHz. There's no
hardware, and several countries are just sitting on the spectrum, but
that's the official ITU dictated direction for S-DAB.


No, the official EU digital (radio +) band is 174-240 MHz. The 'L-band'
you mentioned has been used for digital radio, but it is not suitable
for terrestrial distribution because the frequencies are too high. There
now remain a few transmissions from satellite and just a few thousand
receivers scattered around the continent. I wonder what will happen to
the frequency allocation in 2012.

gr, hwh


I can't predict what will happen in Europe, but in the US, I think
1.5Ghz would be a likely place to move digital radio. How it will be
organized and structured is beyond the abilities of my crystal ball.

As for being unsuitable for terrestrial, please note that Sirius is
using 2320 to 2332.5MHz and XM at 2332.5 to 2345MHz. While allegedly
a satellite based DAB system, much of the urban coverage is via
terrestrial repeaters, primarily to deal with "urban jungle" building
blockage. If 2.3Ghz works, certainly 1.5Ghz will also work.


Sirius uses a dual distribution system, with satellite and terrestrial.
In Europe they tried to use L-Band for terrestrial-only and that doesn't
work. You simply needed too many repeaters, making the system too expensive.

Satellite broadcasting does not work in Europe because there are many
markets. They are too small to make them viable targets. Band III
systems need less transmitters and can easily be split into many
markets. The end of analog TV freed up significant portions of the band
for digital radio (and other services sharing the multiplexes). Digital
TV is moving to UHF-only in many countries, even in less airspace than
before because governments want to cash in on frequencies for mobile
internet. No significant use has been decided (yet) for Band I frequencies.

gr, hwh
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Struble on Zune HD: "But in many ways, it did more for HD Radio thanhad been hoped." LMFAO!!! SMSbuster Shortwave 0 March 16th 11 07:33 PM
NRA Flip-Flops -FAUX plays the "brown note" & the Stupid buyguns? Joe from Kokomo[_2_] Shortwave 5 March 10th 10 02:47 AM
NRA Flip-Flops -FAUX plays the "brown note" & the Stupid buy guns? swiggy[_2_] Shortwave 1 March 9th 10 03:40 AM
NRA Flip-Flops -FAUX plays the "brownnote" & the Stupid buy ... [email protected] Shortwave 1 March 7th 10 06:39 AM
"Screw you HD radio" LMFAO! [email protected] Shortwave 5 July 22nd 08 02:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017