Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 12, 10:49*pm, Dave Barnett
wrote: On 1/12/2012 5:26 PM, SMS wrote: I think you're well aware of the answer. Not every FM station will be able to use 400 Khz. Some can have only one sideband at maximum power. A small percentage can't use either sideband. Life is rough when you're trying to maximize spectral efficiency. In fact a very small percentage will be able to use 400 KHz at their assigned frequencies. *We had this discussion once before, since the Ibiquity spec posted he http://www.nrscstandards.org/SG/NRSC-5-B/1026sE.pdf shows double the occupied bandwidth for a digital signal. You said that most stations are spaced far enough from their adjacent-channel neighbors that this wouldn't be a problem, despite numerous examples of adjacent-channel interference right here in the Bay Area. *The fact is that this would work somewhat in the plains of Western Nebraska, but never in the Bay Area. *Moving just one station has a severe domino effect. *Let me give you an example of one such situation right here in the Bay Area: The South Bay will soon have a full-power FM station on 93.7. *Why? 93.7 KXZM in Felton will be increasing power. *Why? KXSM in Hollister is moving from 93.5 to 93.1 and increasing power. *Why? KOSO in Patterson moved from 93.1 to 92.9 and decreased power. *Why? So 93.1 KHLX in Pollock Pines could move their transmitter closer to Sacramento. How did Pollock Pines get a radio station? *Somebody bought a radio station in Susanville and moved it to Pollock Pines. This is just one example of how tightly sandwiched signals are throughout the US. *A transaction in Susanville has an effect on the Bay Area. - Spacing is already so close that adjacent-channel - HD interference is very obvious to those who know - what it is. NAH - To the average Radio Listener the simply will continue to listen to their Favorite 'Local' Radio Station. To the 99% : Radio Listening It's About Your 'Station*' not the entire Radio Band. * Maybe 1~2~3 Favorite 'Local' Radio Stations. - Those who don't know the difference between regular - static and digital noise just turn off their radio. NAH - They will continue to listen to their Favorite 'Local' Radio Station. -again- To the 99% : Radio Listening It's About Your 'Station*' not the entire Radio Band. -*That is why those of us who care about the real - future of broadcasting and know how to use a - spectrum analyzer would like to see the Ibiquity - scheme just go away and be replaced with a truly - viable digital radio medium. - - Dave B. "spectrum analyzer" ROTFL clearly you are one of the 1%ers; and thus are NOT worthy of consideration when it comes to the Income Stream, Broadcast Revenue and Expenditures related to the operation of one (1) Radio Station as a 'Local' Business Enterprise versus Managing the Entire Radio Band for a Metro Area. As always this is RHF and... I'll leave the Radio 'On' ~ RHF www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1jpxlEPHX8 -ps-:-turn-your-radio-'on'-&-just-listen- ![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Struble on Zune HD: "But in many ways, it did more for HD Radio thanhad been hoped." LMFAO!!! | Shortwave | |||
NRA Flip-Flops -FAUX plays the "brown note" & the Stupid buyguns? | Shortwave | |||
NRA Flip-Flops -FAUX plays the "brown note" & the Stupid buy guns? | Shortwave | |||
NRA Flip-Flops -FAUX plays the "brownnote" & the Stupid buy ... | Shortwave | |||
"Screw you HD radio" LMFAO! | Shortwave |