Research is never released. But that's a strawman argument. Certainly no
station releases raw Arbitron data, for instance...

Of course we do. (an other thing you apparently know nothing about.)

We'll print out and hand over any arbitron info requested.

But interpreted results are always used in promotional and sales. There is
no reason otherwise to spend the money to do them.

There are plenty of reasons to do research that you don't release.

Mainly for strategic programming decisions. (Another thing you apparently
don't know much about.)

It is for internal strategic decision making.

Again, a strawman argument. Even material used for internal decision
making is eventually sold to the public.

Wrong.

Perceptuals find their results in promos stating "we asked and you
said..." "Playing YOUR favorites."

Again, can you tell the difference between an advertising campaign and
scientific research? Apparently not.

Perceptuals, and surveys find their way into sales pitches at ad
agencies.

If it's research into what agencies want...then yes.

But much reserach is never released to the public.

Your attempts to derail responses to a fictitious followup belie your
intent to have a reasonable discussion.

Your continued assumption and incorrect statements of fact have drailed a
reaonable discussion.

The truth has no need of such trickery. Nor does it have need for the
gratuitous insults. Nor debate tactics based on strawman arguments.

True...but you have stated little of truth. Maybe you have leanred thru
voiceovers that you can simply state something and people will accpt it as
fact. DOesn't happen in real life.

You've exposed yourself as a fanboi. Nothing more.

You've exposed yourself as a VO type...who makes authroitative statements an
d expects people to accept them.