Research is never released. But that's a strawman argument. Certainly no
station releases raw Arbitron data, for instance...

Of course we do. (an other thing you apparently know nothing about.)

We'll print out and hand over any arbitron info requested.

But interpreted results are always used in promotional and sales. There is
no reason otherwise to spend the money to do them.

There are plenty of reasons to do research that you don't release.

Mainly for strategic programming decisions. (Another thing you apparently
don't know much about.)

It is for internal strategic decision making.

Again, a strawman argument. Even material used for internal decision
making is eventually sold to the public.

Wrong.

Perceptuals find their results in promos stating "we asked and you
said..." "Playing YOUR favorites."

Again, can you tell the difference between an advertising campaign and
scientific research? Apparently not.

Perceptuals, and surveys find their way into sales pitches at ad
agencies.

If it's research into what agencies want...then yes.

But much reserach is never released to the public.

Your attempts to derail responses to a fictitious followup belie your
intent to have a reasonable discussion.

Your continued assumption and incorrect statements of fact have drailed a
reaonable discussion.

The truth has no need of such trickery. Nor does it have need for the
gratuitous insults. Nor debate tactics based on strawman arguments.

True...but you have stated little of truth. Maybe you have leanred thru
voiceovers that you can simply state something and people will accpt it as
fact. DOesn't happen in real life.

You've exposed yourself as a fanboi. Nothing more.

You've exposed yourself as a VO type...who makes authroitative statements an
d expects people to accept them.

On 1/23/12 14:55 , FarsWatch4 wrote:

True...but you have stated little of truth. Maybe you have leanred thru
voiceovers that you can simply state something and people will accpt it as
fact. DOesn't happen in real life.

You've exposed yourself as a fanboi. Nothing more.

You've exposed yourself as a VO type...who makes authroitative statements an
d expects people to accept them.



I do VO's as a part of my businesses. I'm also build studios, work
with Radio on audio, it's engineering, and one of my businesses is, in
fact, in providing the manpower for research efforts, and converting
those to real and useful results.

And you don't want to know my homeruns in advertising.

I do speak from experience, here. And the authorititative statements I
make are backed by decades of experience.

In markets starting with Chicago, and working my way outward.

But, I'm not the subject of this conversation. HD radio is, and the
fact that you have turned this into a discussion about me, underscores
my point that you really aren't interested in the discussion...only in
silencing dissent when your premises are flawed.

"D. Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
On 1/23/12 14:55 , FarsWatch4 wrote:

True...but you have stated little of truth. Maybe you have leanred thru
voiceovers that you can simply state something and people will accpt it
as
fact. DOesn't happen in real life.

You've exposed yourself as a fanboi. Nothing more.

You've exposed yourself as a VO type...who makes authroitative statements
an
d expects people to accept them.



I do VO's as a part of my businesses. I'm also build studios, work with
Radio on audio, it's engineering, and one of my businesses is, in fact, in
providing the manpower for research efforts, and converting those to real
and useful results.

In other words...a jack of all trades and a master of none.

And you don't want to know my homeruns in advertising.

I could care less.

I do speak from experience, here. And the authorititative statements I
make are backed by decades of experience.

Meh!

But, I'm not the subject of this conversation. HD radio is, and the fact
that you have turned this into a discussion about me, underscores my point
that you really aren't interested in the discussion...only in silencing
dissent when your premises are flawed.

I've exposed the flawed source, and your mis-statements.

On 1/23/12 15:19 , FarsWatch4 wrote:
I could care less.


Yes. So it would appear.

"D. Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
On 1/23/12 15:19 , FarsWatch4 wrote:

I could care less.


Yes. So it would appear.

Yet you aparrently keep coming back for more!

No VO jobs today?

On 1/23/12 15:22 , FarsWatch4 wrote:
"D. Peter wrote in message
...
On 1/23/12 15:19 , FarsWatch4 wrote:

I could care less.


Yes. So it would appear.

Yet you aparrently keep coming back for more!

No VO jobs today?




Finished my VO's by 6am this morning. I get up early.

Wrote several memoes and two letters of recommendation.

Finished a proposal for a syndicated show hitting the air in February
for prospective advertisers by 8:30.

Video meeting with a GM at 9

The aerial photo shoot was cancelled due to the weather.

My people are putting together a focus group for this evening.

And I'm having dinner with a fiddle player from the Old Towne School
at 7.

It's actually as slow day.



What...no stations to manage, today?

"D. Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
On 1/23/12 15:22 , FarsWatch4 wrote:
"D. Peter wrote in message
...
On 1/23/12 15:19 , FarsWatch4 wrote:

I could care less.


Yes. So it would appear.

Yet you aparrently keep coming back for more!

No VO jobs today?




Finished my VO's by 6am this morning. I get up early.

Wrote several memoes and two letters of recommendation.

Finished a proposal for a syndicated show hitting the air in February
for prospective advertisers by 8:30.

Video meeting with a GM at 9

The aerial photo shoot was cancelled due to the weather.

My people are putting together a focus group for this evening.

And I'm having dinner with a fiddle player from the Old Towne School at
7.

It's actually as slow day.





What...no stations to manage, today?

Pretty much done for the day.

Waiting for final sales figures to arrive...and having fun.