How different history might have been if the news media then were as
blasé about Watergate as they've been about Benghazi, if Republicans
then were as disinterested in truth as Democrats are now.

If Watergate had not brought Richard Nixon low, the "emerging
Republican majority" Kevin Phillips predicted in his 1969 book might
well have.

http://www.amazon.com/Emerging-Repub.../dp/0870000586

Democrats wouldn't have won the lopsided majorities in the 1974
congressional elections that led to the vast expansion of domestic
spending that now threatens to bankrupt the country. President Nixon,
if unweakened by scandal, wouldn't have abandoned South Vietnam when
the North Vietnamese invaded.

The Watergate burglars were caught while removing a bug on the phone
of a Democratic National Committee official they believed supplied
prostitutes for visiting Democrat big shots.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/...e-in-break-in/

President Nixon and his senior aides were furious when they found out.
They were undone by their attempt to cover up a crime in which they
were not involved. A crime in which no one died, like those in
Benghazi.

www.ToThePointNews.com

On 05/09/2013 03:42 PM, Jackie Chan wrote:
How different history might have been if the news media then were as
blasé about Watergate as they've been about Benghazi, if Republicans
then were as disinterested in truth as Democrats are now.

If Watergate had not brought Richard Nixon low, the "emerging
Republican majority" Kevin Phillips predicted in his 1969 book might
well have.

http://www.amazon.com/Emerging-Repub.../dp/0870000586

Democrats wouldn't have won the lopsided majorities in the 1974
congressional elections that led to the vast expansion of domestic
spending that now threatens to bankrupt the country. President Nixon,
if unweakened by scandal, wouldn't have abandoned South Vietnam when
the North Vietnamese invaded.

The Watergate burglars were caught while removing a bug on the phone
of a Democratic National Committee official they believed supplied
prostitutes for visiting Democrat big shots.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/...e-in-break-in/

President Nixon and his senior aides were furious when they found out.
They were undone by their attempt to cover up a crime in which they
were not involved. A crime in which no one died, like those in
Benghazi.

www.ToThePointNews.com


Fog of war and all that. It's good to be da king. Get over it.

HABITUAL ****HEAD POLITICAL POSTING PUKE

****HEAD

On Thu, 9 May 2013 15:42:45 -0700 (PDT), Jackie Chan
wrote:

.... an incredible amount of bull****.


There is no comparison between Benghazi and Watergate. John Steward
Wed show pretty much lays it all out.

HABITUAL ****HEAD POLITICAL POSTING PUKE

****HEAD

On 5/12/2013 5:48 AM, Topaz wrote:
by James Buchanan

Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession.

Let's not say that...because it is NOT true. It was just a teeny little
bit worse than "merely being removed from positions...". Have you
forgotten Kristallnacht? Have you overlooked all the death camps? Not
seen all the newsreels of the dead bodies? (and no, they did not have
Photoshop back then). How would you explain all that away? Oh, wait, I
know! They were just "merely removed from their positions".

Germany went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full
employment just a couple years later. If an incredible economic
improvement can be achieved, merely by removing the Jews...

Again, not quite. The economy improved mostly due to major league war
production. Yes, the people were indeed back to work -- making guns,
bombs, planes. Review Charles Lindbergh's writings on his visit to
Germany circa 1938 regarding Germany's war-based economy.

Either you and Buchanan are gullible, naive or ignorant of world
history, probably all of the above.

Thanks for proving once again that the two most common things in the
universe are hydrogen...and stupidity.

On Sunday, May 12, 2013 7:52:08 AM UTC-5, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 5/12/2013 5:48 AM, Topaz wrote:

by James Buchanan



Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of

political power and banned them from the legal profession.



Let's not say that...because it is NOT true. It was just a teeny little

bit worse than "merely being removed from positions...". Have you

forgotten Kristallnacht? Have you overlooked all the death camps? Not

seen all the newsreels of the dead bodies? (and no, they did not have

Photoshop back then). How would you explain all that away? Oh, wait, I

know! They were just "merely removed from their positions".



Germany went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full

employment just a couple years later. If an incredible economic

improvement can be achieved, merely by removing the Jews...



Again, not quite. The economy improved mostly due to major league war

production. Yes, the people were indeed back to work -- making guns,

bombs, planes. Review Charles Lindbergh's writings on his visit to

Germany circa 1938 regarding Germany's war-based economy.



Either you and Buchanan are gullible, naive or ignorant of world

history, probably all of the above.



Thanks for proving once again that the two most common things in the

universe are hydrogen...and stupidity.

Google,,, Why East Germany is lagging 24 years after the Berlin Wall came down qz.com www.veteranstoday.com Benghazi's dirty little secret

On 5/9/2013 3:42 PM, Jackie Chan wrote:
How different history might have been if the news media then were as
blasé about Watergate as they've been about Benghazi, if Republicans
then were as disinterested in truth as Democrats are now.


ROTFLMAO!!!!! Comparing Benghazi to Watergate is like comparing your
IQ to Stephen Hawking's.

HABITUAL ****HEAD POLITICAL POSTING PUKE

****HEAD

HABITUAL ****HEAD POLITICAL POSTING PUKE

****HEAD