Anyone using an antenna multicoupler (powered or unpowered)? The powered
versions allow multiple receivers to be simultaneously connected to a single
antenna without loss. Looking for experiences, recommendations, etc.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

Brian Denley wrote:
Anyone using an antenna multicoupler (powered or unpowered)? The powered
versions allow multiple receivers to be simultaneously connected to a single
antenna without loss. Looking for experiences, recommendations, etc.




I've been using actives by both I.C.E. and Stridsburg for a
nunber of years. Both are quiet, with good isolation, and make for
very convenient use of multiple receivers. I can got with 8
receivers at a time with a single antenna, if need be, with no
noticeable interaction.

I took a hit from a nearby lightning strike a few years ago, and
it took out the I.C.E. multicoupler. I.C.E. service was quick,
clean, with zero headaches. Stridsburg, from experience of a
colleague is the same.

Stridsburg pieces are built to mil spec, and are easily
available. I.C.E. is less easy to find.

I've noticed no practical difference between the two.

I had a bad experience with a Stridsberg active coupler, for 2 outputs.
I bought it mainly for use below HF. It didn't work--had excessive loss
below about 3MHz. I took it to work and swept it, and sure enough it
steadily had more and more loss, starting about 3MHz; at 500kHz it had
about -20dB loss compared to 3MHz. Its specs claimed "good to 100kHz",
but that wasn't true. Stridsberg refused to correct it--after sending my
unit back twice for "repair", and having it returned with no change from
original, I returned it and got my money back.
If your interests are 3MHz and above, the Stridsberg active coupler will
work fine, but not below that, if you want.
(My unit consisted of an input lowpass filter, a MMIC amplifier feeding
a MiniCircuits splitter to the two outputs--if you're interested in
technical details.)
Steve

Brian Denley wrote:

Anyone using an antenna multicoupler (powered or unpowered)? The powered
versions allow multiple receivers to be simultaneously connected to a single
antenna without loss. Looking for experiences, recommendations, etc.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

In article ,
Steve Ratzlaff wrote:

I had a bad experience with a Stridsberg active coupler, for 2
outputs. I bought it mainly for use below HF. It didn't work--had
excessive loss below about 3MHz. I took it to work and swept it, and
sure enough it steadily had more and more loss, starting about 3MHz;
at 500kHz it had about -20dB loss compared to 3MHz. Its specs claimed
"good to 100kHz", but that wasn't true. Stridsberg refused to correct
it--after sending my unit back twice for "repair", and having it
returned with no change from original, I returned it and got my money
back. If your interests are 3MHz and above, the Stridsberg active
coupler will work fine, but not below that, if you want. (My unit
consisted of an input lowpass filter, a MMIC amplifier feeding a
MiniCircuits splitter to the two outputs--if you're interested in
technical details.)

Sounds like they screw up on the series coupling capacitors that were
used. Maybe the capacitors were the right value except off by a decade
like 4.7uF as opposed to .47uF.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Anyone using an antenna multicoupler (powered or unpowered)? The powered
versions allow multiple receivers to be simultaneously connected to a single
antenna without loss.

Greatest thing since sliced bread. I use a DX-1PRO to feed a halfdozen
receivers in two rooms. The ability to pickup any frequency that got past the
antenna is the greatest attribute.
Side benefit is that you can finally do dside-by-side comparisons.
Also, some lightning protection.
I ONLY use actives with amps after the splitter to prevent interaction. (The
are not for S-38 classs radios).

Radioman390:
What was the problem with your S-38? Three of the receivers I am planning
to couple are an HQ-150, a R-388 and a SX-28. The other 5 are modern solid
state radios.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html
"Radioman390" wrote in message
...
Anyone using an antenna multicoupler (powered or unpowered)? The powered
versions allow multiple receivers to be simultaneously connected to a
single
antenna without loss.

Greatest thing since sliced bread. I use a DX-1PRO to feed a halfdozen
receivers in two rooms. The ability to pickup any frequency that got past
the
antenna is the greatest attribute.
Side benefit is that you can finally do dside-by-side comparisons.
Also, some lightning protection.
I ONLY use actives with amps after the splitter to prevent interaction.
(The
are not for S-38 classs radios).

I use a Wellbrook, works great.


"Brian Denley" wrote in message news:0E4Oa.22567$I8.14009@rwcrnsc53...
Anyone using an antenna multicoupler (powered or unpowered)? The powered
versions allow multiple receivers to be simultaneously connected to a single
antenna without loss. Looking for experiences, recommendations, etc.

W.J. Ford, a surplus dealer in Canada, sells a new 8-port active multi for
about U.S. $150. It's well made, with some lightning protection. I have one and
have had zero problems.

Check out www.testequipmentcanada.com/M-50-8.html

Avery W3AVE
Potomac, Md.

Avery:
That's a great price compared to the Stridsberg. I wonder if 23 db
isolation is enough. Thanks to all for the advice!

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

"AComarow" wrote in message
...
W.J. Ford, a surplus dealer in Canada, sells a new 8-port active multi for
about U.S. $150. It's well made, with some lightning protection. I have
one and
have had zero problems.

Check out www.testequipmentcanada.com/M-50-8.html

Avery W3AVE
Potomac, Md.

Radioman390:
Are you also using RF systems multicoupler (DA-4 or DA-8 distribution amp)?

No, I have a Wiltek 108 (mil spec unit).
Quite good. Because I'm far from AM, I bypassed the 2 MHz highpass filter, so
it can pass broadcast band, which I DX