In other words, you're too gutless to list the shows from which you glean your
pearls of liberalness.

Your response was a childish reply to an authentic request for information
that may shed light on your postings to the NG. Not that the light would have
indicated any defect, no more so than other people that post to this group are
influenced by their choices as I am by mine. But you chose the tirade route,
avoid direct conflict at all cost and attempt to portray the holder of views
opposite to yours as a fanatic.

So typical of liberals, I've seen it many times before.

God Bless you Frank.




In article ,
"Frank Dresser" wrote:

The Party made me quite a promise, too. Assuming I could corrupt each and
every American and overthrow the US Government with my evil scheme, I'd be
rewarded with my own shortwave radio factory! I'd reopen the Hallicrafters
plant at Fifth and Kostner and make brand new SX-42s and S-40s and S-36s and
SX-28s, all painted bright red, filled with Soviet tubes and tuned to Radio
Havana and RFPI. I'd also get to commisurate with the "Back in the USSR"
Commie Babes (certainly NOT the shot putters and tractor magazine cover
girls) and drink Russian Vodka all day.

But Dammitall! You've exposed my Evil Ultra-Liberalness. Now I'll never be
able to do any of that way cool stuff. Well, the vodka part may still be
doable. If I'm eligible for unemployment comp.

On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:05:46 -0500, Soliloquy wrote
(in message ):


In other words, you're too gutless to list the shows from which you glean
your pearls of liberalness.

plonk



Gray Shockley
-----------------------
DX-392 DX-398
RX-320 DX-399
CCradio w/RS Loop
Torus Tuner (3-13 MHz)
Select-A-Tenna
-----------------------
Vicksburg, MS US

"Soliloquy" wrote in message
...
In other words, you're too gutless to list the shows from which you glean
your
pearls of liberalness.

People used to study John Locke and John Stuart Mills and Calvin and Hobbes
(John and Thomas) and other dead guys to help themselves understand
Liberalness or Conservativeness or whatever. Now we have the Alex Jones
Show. Maybe I'm being unfair to Alex. I suspect he has some idea who those
guys were.

But the idea that a person can adequately come to conclusions about
philosophy and human nature from the infotainment press is simply
ridiculous.
`

Your response was a childish reply to an authentic request for information
that may shed light on your postings to the NG.


If any of my postings need light shedding, just ask. I can lighten up my
own point so much better than either Pravda or Izvestia can.


Not that the light would have
indicated any defect, no more so than other people that post to this group
are
influenced by their choices as I am by mine.

Soliloquy, you may prefer the monolog. If I don't want to share what I read
and listen to, so be it. Even if my reasons are completely trivial, it's
none of nobody's business but my own. You seem to have a curious idea of
privacy, especially for somebody who uses phoney IDs.

But you chose the tirade route,
avoid direct conflict at all cost and attempt to portray the holder of
views
opposite to yours as a fanatic.

That's what I was doing? I thought I was ridiculing the ridiculious.


So typical of liberals, I've seen it many times before.

Many, many, many, many times, no doubt. Maybe someday, it will be no more
remarkable than the passing of the clouds.


God Bless you Frank.




God has blessed me, and all of us, with Shortwave Radio!

Frank Dresser

Frank Dresser wrote:

The Party made me quite a promise, too. Assuming I could corrupt each and
every American and overthrow the US Government with my evil scheme, I'd be
rewarded with my own shortwave radio factory! I'd reopen the Hallicrafters
plant at Fifth and Kostner and make brand new SX-42s and S-40s and S-36s and
SX-28s, all painted bright red, filled with Soviet tubes and tuned to Radio
Havana and RFPI.

I'd hold out for the SX-88. :-)


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

More of the same. Yawn.

Psychobabble for all. If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle
them with your bull.

That's the great thing about the 20th and 21st centuries, we have evolved to
the point where you can say nothing and appear that you indeed have said
something.

Modern art typifies this, a picture hung upside down in a gallery for a year
before anyone realized it. In a more recent example, electricians at one
gallery undergoing restoration made their own impromptu "modern art" painting,
and hung it with others in the gallery. I'm sure that it would have remained
there but for the diligence of the gallery staff that are accustomed to seeing
the normal display.

I believe that you don't list your sources because you have no sources, save
for the casual exposure to the usual network fare. This is what makes your
criticisms and attempts at witticisms so hypocritical.

Some posters to this group dealing mainly with religious and conservative
issues are collectively excoriated by many in the group, but actually write
with far more substance than their "so called" progressives detractors.



God Bless you Frank.


Soliloquy, you may prefer the monolog. If I don't want to share what I read
and listen to, so be it.



In article ,
"Frank Dresser" wrote:

People used to study John Locke and John Stuart Mills and Calvin and Hobbes
(John and Thomas) and other dead guys to help themselves understand
Liberalness or Conservativeness or whatever. Now we have the Alex Jones
Show. Maybe I'm being unfair to Alex. I suspect he has some idea who those
guys were.

But the idea that a person can adequately come to conclusions about
philosophy and human nature from the infotainment press is simply
ridiculous.
`


If any of my postings need light shedding, just ask. I can lighten up my
own point so much better than either Pravda or Izvestia can.




Soliloquy, you may prefer the monolog. If I don't want to share what I read
and listen to, so be it. Even if my reasons are completely trivial, it's
none of nobody's business but my own. You seem to have a curious idea of
privacy, especially for somebody who uses phoney IDs.



That's what I was doing? I thought I was ridiculing the ridiculious.



Many, many, many, many times, no doubt. Maybe someday, it will be no more
remarkable than the passing of the clouds.


God Bless you Frank.




God has blessed me, and all of us, with Shortwave Radio!

Frank Dresser

*********Good post Soliloquy*****************

*****LOUD HAND CLAPPING*******
:-)

--
~*~*~Monitoring the Spectrum~*~*~
***GO BEARCATS***
~*~*~Oct.15th Payback Begins~*~*~*~
~~~Hammarlund129X/140X~~~
**Heathkit Q Multiplier**
GE P-780
"Soliloquy" wrote in message
...
Pretty lame Frank. I'm sure that there are others on this group that would
be
as interested as I am in seeing the news and commentary sources that you
believe are credible. Levity aside, exactly what and who do you find
credible,
or are you more interested in concealing the depth of your liberalness.

For your edification, I listen to and/or read the following.

Alex Jones
Michael Trudeau
John Stadtmiller
Joyce Riley von Kleist & Dave von Kleist
Jeremy Floyd
EWTN
Hal Turner
Rabbi Spivak
Tom Valentine
Michael Trudeau

The LIBERTY NET!

World Net Daily
News Max
World News Net (check out the url http://www.universalradio.com/ )
The Heritage Foundation
The National Review online
The Federal Observer
The Sierra Times
Jewish World Review
Israel National News (Arutz Sheva)
Jerusalem Post Online
Haaretz Online
Human Events Online
Middle East Media Research Institute MEMRI
Islam Online

Ann Coulter
Mona Charen
Walter Williams
Patrick Buchanan
William Buckley

And more..

See Frank, good or bad, at least I can define who and what I read or
listen
to. Not PBS stuff for sure, neither is it BBC, but why limit oneself to
such a
controlled media. For anyone that thinks otherwise, the liberal media is
highly controlled, both in content and verbiage.

Pursuant to verbiage, the following:

In the Pittsburgh area recently, there has been an unfortunate murder (one
of
many anymore), described by the 2 papers available here thus.

Woman and two fetuses murdered.

Pregnant woman murdered.

Which of the above article headlines do you believe represents the
"liberal
newspaper"?

Rather tragically the "woman and two fetuses murdered" represents the
liberal
rag. No surprise there though, since the liberal sacrament is abortion,
and
the host the aborted fetuses. The newspaper is unable to acknowledge that
the
murder of the woman represents the loss of three lives. Oh sure, they
acknowledge that the law will regard this crime as a triple murder, but in
spirit they don't acknowledge the true loss of the babies, the human
babies,
the same life forms that have been destroyed by the tens of millions by
"so
called" doctors. But how could they? We have been inculcated on the topic
of
choice, the euphemistic term for a procedure that, when applied to late
term
babies, is nothing more than society sanctioned murder. Crush the head,
remove
the brains by suction, hey, it's nothing more than a medical procedure,
like
removing an unwanted mole or wart.

This is why I read Jewish and Arab publications, because I don't believe
either side, they both lie when the opportunity suits them, as does the
U.S.
and Conservatives, and liberals. The truth cannot be divined via a limited
exposure to people of the same ilk, they have the same biases. Despite my
wealth of so called "rightwing extremist" sources, I am also inundated by
the
pabulum disseminated by the mainstream media everyday, I did not list
those as
sources.

So Frank, in a rare moment of seriousness, especially regarding news and
information sources, if not for the group, how about letting me know your
bias? I have shown you mine.

Regards.




In article ,
"Frank Dresser" wrote:

"Soliloquy" wrote in message
...

Concerning news and information, for the group's edification, exactly
who
do
you listen to and find credible, shortwave or otherwise?

Regards.



I, well, uh -- um, I didn't know the group cared. This is so humbling.
But
I have named a first rate news source! Right here on this very
newsgroup,
I've expressed my great admiration for the Weekly World News. Even
Chicago's so-called World's Greatest Newspaper (which also owns a radio
station) prints an error correction column, usually several times a week.
No such thing in the WWN!

Of course, if the group desires further elucidation, just ask, en masse.

Frank Dresser

"starman" wrote in message
...

I'd hold out for the SX-88. :-)


No longer will such fine radios as the SX-88, the SX-73 and the Double
Diversity receiver be limited to the greedy, rich capitalists. Equality
will rule! However, most of our comrades will only be sufficently equal for
the 3 tube SkyBuddy II.

Frank Dresser

"I. P. Yurin" wrote in message
...


Newly commissioned Agent for Special Tasks, Frank Dresser, "Frank
Dresser" , replied in righteous
indignation, and with the full support of not only the Party, but the
undeterrable march of History itself! thusly:


The Party is the proper source of all "news". The current, vicious
lies in reactionary presses are circulated in a controlled fashion,
however, to that segment of the leadership that needs to be kept
abreast of these things.


Yes! That's exactly what I tried to make clear to Dan Rather. Somehow he
thought I was saying "What's the frequency, Kenneth!" Believe it or not,
some citizens are even more obtuse.




Oh, about my Liberalness? Gave it up. Tried Socialism but it was too
weak.
I'm now a card carrying Communist!


By the way, I love the cards. The suits are a little different. They're
all Red! And we don't have diamonds, hearts and spades. Instead, we have
Stars, Hammers and Sickles. We still have the Club, but ours is far more
intimidating.



And we are happy to have you, Comrade Dresser. Pay no attention to the
ravings of the reactionary half-wits. They have one foot in History's
garbage bin. You will grow calloused to these spiteful attacks.


Indeed. But I have been troubled by the possibility that a reactionary
half-wit might figure out how much corruption and confusion I, and the
controlled Liberal controlled media might spread among the capitalists. I
suppose it's better to have a half-wit know the full truth than a full-wit
know half the truth.



(personal aside: be careful about endorsing the anarchic elements at
RFPI. They have a very uncertain standing within the Comintern and the
security organs at the present time. Best to steer clear of their
non-Party, undisciplined approach.)

These radios have many fine qualities, but frequency stability is not among
them. Anytime the "Right-Wing Choice" deviates from the Party Line, the
receiver will most asssuredly drift straight to Radio Pyongyang. The radio
itself will steer clear!



Those who toil tirelessly on behalf of the People deserve only the
best during their necessary recuperation periods. Unfortunately, the
opening to the West has seen some of our more talented massage girls
leave for the cheap attractions of food, money, etc. Nonetheless, we
are certain you will not be unhappy. You may, for example, request a 6
month tour as bath-house guard at any of the women's Corrective Labor
Institutions.


And surely the Party is aware that the I, and the controlled Liberal
controlled media, are resposible for but a fraction of the confusion and
corruption of the Capitalist nations. Others have achieved far more.
Clearly, Comrade Bill Gates has earned the best.


There is NO unemployment under socialism and the Wise Rule of the
Party, Comrade! 101% employment, 101% of the time!


This is wonderful news! I feared that after exposure of my Evil
Ultra-Liberal scheme, the Party would kick me out and I'd be looking for an
unemployment check. Am I to understand that there will never be a check,
but cancellation is always a possibility?


All those who do not filter their subjective ramblings through the
furnace of the Party's guiding ideology are liars, whether they wish
to be or not.


Well said! It took a couple of wild cab rides to get Dan Rather to
understand.



Indeed. The article, and the worm who wrote it, will eventually be
spit from the mouth of the Party into the yawning gates of the
Corrective Labor Camps.

These journalists are obviously unaware of the requirements of correct
journalism. So many journalists think their job is to ask some questions,
write some words and to present a somewhat factual, mostly readable, story
before the deadline. They are completely unaware of their awesome
resposibility to shape the historical insights, the philosophy, why, the
very thought processes of thier readers. Just imagine the damage that might
be done to a strong minded Liberal, should he stumble across the World Net
Daily webpage. God, well - The Party, only knows what's happening with the
weak minded.

Will they send the TV NewsBabes to the Corrective Labor Camps? Hope I can
get my guard duty scheduled on time.



Ignore the capitalist, fake-religionists, who pretend to care about a
fetus until the moment it is born.


You will make an excellent Information Officer one day, Comrade
Dresser. I see promotion in your near future.

--
Col. I.P. Yurin
Commissariat of Internal Security

Stakhanovite
Order of Lenin (1937)
Hero of Socialist Labor (1939)

I haven't felt this much anticipation since the day I gave Alex Jones the
camcorder and the map to Bohimian Grove!!

Frank Dresser

"Soliloquy" wrote in message
...
More of the same. Yawn.

Psychobabble for all. If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance,
baffle
them with your bull.

That's the great thing about the 20th and 21st centuries, we have evolved
to
the point where you can say nothing and appear that you indeed have said
something.


Yep. And I said something, so it counts double.


Modern art typifies this, a picture hung upside down in a gallery for a
year
before anyone realized it. In a more recent example, electricians at one
gallery undergoing restoration made their own impromptu "modern art"
painting,
and hung it with others in the gallery. I'm sure that it would have
remained
there but for the diligence of the gallery staff that are accustomed to
seeing
the normal display.

Modern Art? Is that on SW radio now? What's that got to do with Texe Marrs
or Alex Jones?

Oh, any comment on my one-liner which started this sub-thread:

"I think Alex Jones has been a student of Prof. Texe Marrs."


I believe that you don't list your sources because you have no sources,
save
for the casual exposure to the usual network fare. This is what makes your
criticisms and attempts at witticisms so hypocritical.

So true! I have no sources, and I've learned nothing from my non-sources.
And I state my non-knowledge in such an unclear fashion that I'm obligated
to list my non-sources so the billions and billions of Usenetters who are
absolutely fascinated with my poorly stated posts will happily pour through
old books, neswpapers, radio shows, TV shows , life expirience,
conversations, even recreating my time in the government schools and church
in order to clarify a Usenet post.

Yes, I know nothing and I contradict that non-knowledge every time I
critisize another post. Such is hypocrisy.


Some posters to this group dealing mainly with religious and conservative
issues are collectively excoriated by many in the group, but actually
write
with far more substance than their "so called" progressives detractors.



God Bless you Frank.



God has blessed us all with SW radio!

Frank Dresser

"Uncle Jizzie" wrote in message
...
"Texe Mars, what a fool. Tonight's fantasies include the Pope's opposition
to the Mel Gibson movie "Passion". Never mind that the Vatican has given
thumbs up to "Passion". I guess that Texe has never let the facts get in
the way. Texe has never met a Catholic that he didn't hate. Nice
Christian.

http://www.texemarrs.com/

I find it hard to believe that this is the same Texe Marrs that used to be a
noted author on the field of robotics!
He used to crank out anti-New Age books until even Wicca became mainstream.
The paranoid fool can find a conspiracy under his own bed!

Just another loose nut in the engine of civilization.
===
And in case you think the Bible is boring, here's some of the "naughty bits"
your local preacher hopes you don't ask him to explain. Feel free to drive
your local door-to-door evangelists crazy with them (I did, and they've
stopped coming to my door!).

"Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the
stones." - Psalm 137:9 KJV

"Behold, I will corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon your faces, even the
dung of your solemn feasts; and one shall take you away with it." - Malachi
2:3 KJV

"But Rabshakeh said unto them, Hath my master sent me to thy master, and to
thee, to speak these words? hath he not sent me to the men which sit on the
wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own **** with
you?" - 2 Kings 18-27 KJV

"For she doted upon their paramours, whose flesh is as the flesh of asses,
and whose issue is like the issue of horses." - Ezekiel 23:20 KJV

"If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice
of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have
chastened him, will not hearken unto them: Then shall his father and his
mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and
unto the gate of his place; And they shall say unto the elders of his city,
This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a
glutton, and a drunkard. And all the men of his city shall stone him with
stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all
Israel shall hear, and fear." - Deuteronomy 21:18-21 KJV

" And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and
of thy daughters, which the LORD thy God hath given thee, in the siege, and
in the straitness, wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee:" -
Deuteronomy 28:53 KJV

Hellbound for all eternity,

Steven F. Scharff