Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pete KE9OA" wrote in message ...
As far as the receiver itself, we have located a pretty good CPU..................my boss wants to put in some fancy features, such as a spectrum display, etc. I would also like to aim this receiver at the average person, so I am thinking about bass and treble controls. I may not be the average person... but some random thoughts away from "fancy features": 1. A tuned front end? It really does make a difference. 2. Still using DDS for the LO? Make sure the encoder knob "feels" like a good old variable capacitor (or variable inductor). I have been universally disappointed by the shaft encoders used on current synthesized radios. 3. The closer any spectrum display can be made to a good old panadaptor, the better. They did that user interface right. Again, I'm disappointed by the spectrum displays on current production hardware, but I may be the last guy who still likes knobs over a bazillion mode buttons. Tim. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
W7ZOI/K5IRK High Performance RX | Homebrew | |||
High school radio stations alive and well | Broadcasting | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
High performance MW receiver | Shortwave |