Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I picked up a station in Mexico city from the Texas hill country. With a
crystal set. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dxers in New Zealand and Australia have heard European MW stations,
which is about as far as you can get. Sorry I've not got the details to hand -- Paul |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paulb wrote:
Dxers in New Zealand and Australia have heard European MW stations, which is about as far as you can get. Sorry I've not got the details to hand -- Paul They like to use very long antennas for MW DX'ing. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:58:23 -0400, starman wrote:
Paulb wrote: Dxers in New Zealand and Australia have heard European MW stations, which is about as far as you can get. Sorry I've not got the details to hand -- Paul They like to use very long antennas for MW DX'ing. Rotatable loop antennas are usually considered better for MW as you can null out local stations. -- Cheers, Stan Barr stanb .at. dial .dot. pipex .dot. com (Remove any digits from the addresses when mailing me.) The future was never like this! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Barr wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:58:23 -0400, starman wrote: Paulb wrote: Dxers in New Zealand and Australia have heard European MW stations, which is about as far as you can get. Sorry I've not got the details to hand -- Paul They like to use very long antennas for MW DX'ing. Rotatable loop antennas are usually considered better for MW as you can null out local stations. Loops are not sensitive enough for very long MW reception compared to other antenna types. The folks down under prefer very long beverage antennas orientated in the direction that favors Europe. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "starman" wrote in message ... Stan Barr wrote: On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:58:23 -0400, starman wrote: Paulb wrote: Dxers in New Zealand and Australia have heard European MW stations, which is about as far as you can get. Sorry I've not got the details to hand -- Paul They like to use very long antennas for MW DX'ing. Rotatable loop antennas are usually considered better for MW as you can null out local stations. Loops are not sensitive enough for very long MW reception compared to other antenna types. The folks down under prefer very long beverage antennas orientated in the direction that favors Europe. I logged 87 countries from 1959 to 1963, as well as getting verification of over 2,300 stations total. The best combination today would be phased beverage antennas if you have the land... about 1000 feet needed... or phased slopers (big yard needed). But a loop is sensitive enough under most conditions... it is the most common antenna of most AM DXers, few of whom can put up 1000 foot aerials. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:45:46 -0400, starman wrote:
Stan Barr wrote: On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:58:23 -0400, starman wrote: Paulb wrote: Dxers in New Zealand and Australia have heard European MW stations, which is about as far as you can get. Sorry I've not got the details to hand -- Paul They like to use very long antennas for MW DX'ing. Rotatable loop antennas are usually considered better for MW as you can null out local stations. Loops are not sensitive enough for very long MW reception compared to other antenna types. The folks down under prefer very long beverage antennas orientated in the direction that favors Europe. Sensitivity is not a problem, in my experience. I used to run an active tuned MW loop and my Rx could hear the background noise on a quiet frequency easily, any more sensitivity than that is a liability rather than an advantage. It depends a lot on the local noise levels, I am in a rather noisy urban environment, if you live out in the Australian outback the situation would be different, of course. The ability to rotate the antenna to null out a local broadcaster and hear the dx station underneath is the big advantage of a loop. -- Cheers, Stan Barr stanb .at. dial .dot. pipex .dot. com (Remove any digits from the addresses when mailing me.) The future was never like this! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"--exray--" wrote in message
... Check this out.... http://www.geocities.com/MarkWA1ION/nfdx2001.htm And from this side of the pond...... http://www.dx.freewire.co.uk/ regards, Ian |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Collins Broadcast Transmitters and Etc | Broadcasting | |||
Press Release: Milestone Broadcast - Rock-it turns #1000 | Broadcasting | |||
for better AM broadcast reception on the IC-R3 | Scanner | |||
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna |