Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
This leaves me with yet another AM broadcast question. I'm interested to find out what 50KW AM broadcast stations http://www.ac6v.com/clearam.htm#USA (not in your state, or at least 200 miles away) are in fact reliable and listenable to you ??? As a native Minnesotan, one thing that I've always found disappointing is that WCCO (830 kHz) doesn't seem to get out as well as other clear channel stations. Last week, I was road tripping, and as we rolled into Escanaba, MI, I found I was able to get KYW, KDKA, WBZ, WHAS, and others without trouble, but nothing on 830. I'm wondering... do others find that WCCO is a more difficult catch than other clear channels? (P.S. I should probably mention that back in 1986, I was able to listen to WCCO's Gopher football broadcast on a walkman in the Liberty Bowl stadium in Memphis, TN, while watching the Gophers play that game live. So it would seem that "CCO's signal got out better in the past.) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Calguire wrote:
Michael wrote: This leaves me with yet another AM broadcast question. I'm interested to find out what 50KW AM broadcast stations http://www.ac6v.com/clearam.htm#USA (not in your state, or at least 200 miles away) are in fact reliable and listenable to you ??? As a native Minnesotan, one thing that I've always found disappointing is that WCCO (830 kHz) doesn't seem to get out as well as other clear channel stations. Last week, I was road tripping, and as we rolled into Escanaba, MI, I found I was able to get KYW, KDKA, WBZ, WHAS, and others without trouble, but nothing on 830. I'm wondering... do others find that WCCO is a more difficult catch than other clear channels? I have the same problem with receiving WHAM-1180 Rochester, NY in the daytime. I can get all the NYC and Boston 50-KW stations in the day but not WHAM, which is about the same distance from me as NYC. I think it may have something to do with their transmitter location and ground (soil) conditions. Also the Hudson river valley may enhance daytime MW propagation to my area from NYC. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
starman wrote:
I have the same problem with receiving WHAM-1180 Rochester, NY in the daytime. I can get all the NYC and Boston 50-KW stations in the day but not WHAM, which is about the same distance from me as NYC. I think it may have something to do with their transmitter location and ground (soil) conditions. Also the Hudson river valley may enhance daytime MW propagation to my area from NYC. WHAM's relatively high dial position doesn't help. A given amount of power covers better at the bottom of the dial (daytime) than it does at the top - by an amazing amount. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
starman wrote: I have the same problem with receiving WHAM-1180 Rochester, NY in the daytime. I can get all the NYC and Boston 50-KW stations in the day but not WHAM, which is about the same distance from me as NYC. I think it may have something to do with their transmitter location and ground (soil) conditions. Also the Hudson river valley may enhance daytime MW propagation to my area from NYC. WHAM's relatively high dial position doesn't help. A given amount of power covers better at the bottom of the dial (daytime) than it does at the top - by an amazing amount. True but I can get 1130-NYC and 1030-Boston with relatively strong daytime signals. My antenna is not long enough to be directional for MW. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
starman wrote:
True but I can get 1130-NYC and 1030-Boston with relatively strong daytime signals. My antenna is not long enough to be directional for MW. Interesting. Your antenna probably *is* directional for MW, just not predictably so... -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
starman wrote: True but I can get 1130-NYC and 1030-Boston with relatively strong daytime signals. My antenna is not long enough to be directional for MW. Interesting. Your antenna probably *is* directional for MW, just not predictably so... -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com Every small antenna has the same pattern, a donut with a single axis of opposite nulls, for its electrical response and for its magnetic response. So if it's chiefly electrical or chiefly magnetic, it's a donut. You get deep nulls mostly by constructing small antennas so they are entirely magnetic or entirely electrical. Otherwise the out-of-phase electrical and magnetic responses fill in each other's nulls. Or you can phase-shift the electrical response and get a unidirectional combination electrical/magnetic antenna, eg. a loop plus a co-located whip combined with a phase shift. -- Ron Hardin On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Hardin wrote:
Doug Smith W9WI wrote: starman wrote: True but I can get 1130-NYC and 1030-Boston with relatively strong daytime signals. My antenna is not long enough to be directional for MW. Interesting. Your antenna probably *is* directional for MW, just not predictably so... -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com Every small antenna has the same pattern, a donut with a single axis of opposite nulls, for its electrical response and for its magnetic response. So if it's chiefly electrical or chiefly magnetic, it's a donut. You get deep nulls mostly by constructing small antennas so they are entirely magnetic or entirely electrical. Otherwise the out-of-phase electrical and magnetic responses fill in each other's nulls. Or you can phase-shift the electrical response and get a unidirectional combination electrical/magnetic antenna, eg. a loop plus a co-located whip combined with a phase shift. The explanation I favor is the WHAM groundwave signal is weaker than the other stations I mentioned in this thread because of unfavorable soil conditions and/or a deteriorated ground radial system at the antenna site. I think those are the most likely causes of reduced daytime coverage. It would be interesting to know what their (WHAM) daytime coverage was a few decades ago, to determine if it has deteriorated over the years. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
great pay at Clear channel stations | Broadcasting | |||
FS:SP1-A SPEECH PROSCESSOR BY CLEAR CHANNEL | CB | |||
Will "Deja Vu (All Over Again)" be heard on any Clear Channel stations? | Broadcasting | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
"Deal with the Devil"? (KUSC, Clear Channel deal) | Broadcasting |