Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... And yes, receiving antennas can be hidden quite well. Some of us are licensed ham and enjoy our hobby as you do. Just because we move into a new home in a new area why should we give up the hobby we so enjoy? Why, if ham radio is such an importaint part of your life, was it not included in your plans for a new home? If I wanted an antenna farm the last place I would look for property would be in a housing project. I would be looking at a rual area where there is lots of trees to hang wire from and lots of ground to plant towers. Willee |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
What Ed is saying is: If you enjoy a hobby that requires an antenna or
anything outside your home forget it, buckle down to raising fish and sell the radio hobby stuff. That will be the day I turn my home over the HOA Cops, agreement or not. If homeowners keep buckling down to these people next thing you will be paying their mortgage and taxes. Go Bless America for the freedoms our proud veterans fought for. Ed Price wrote: "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message link.net... "Jim Higgins" wrote: It limits you to antennas 1 meter in diameter or across the diagonal. No 6-ele 20M beams here. No, it doesn't have that limit. The first paragraph describes antennas for satellite services and the second paragraph describes antennas for video programming services. The third paragraph... (3) An antenna that is designed to receive local television broadcast signals. Masts higher than 12 feet above the roofline may be subject to local permitting requirements. ...describes antennas for broadcast television and no size limit is described (only the height limit). By the way, a large 20M beam should receive broadcast television fairly nicely (with a little hardware to cut out the television while transmitting). Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ Read the rest of the ruling. It defines that the antenna may be located only in your private area (patio, balcony), not in the public or mutually owned areas (roof, outside wall). This makes it none too helpful for apartment and condo dwellers. Accept it; there are some hobbies that are incompatible with high-density dwellings. Ed WB6WSN |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Clint, Actually, it's exactly like what I said. Please don't attribute any more to what I said than what was actually there. You don't have the slightest idea of how I feel about HOAs so comments like yours only show an ability to jump to a conclusion without any supporting evidence. Sort of like reading the "National Enquirer"(s), entertaining but worthless... 'Doc |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
receiving antennas can be hidden quite well. Some of us are licensed ham
and enjoy our hobby as you do. Just because we move into a new home in a new area why should we give up the hobby we so enjoy? Why, if ham radio is such an importaint part of your life, was it not included in your plans for a new home? If I wanted an antenna farm the last place I would look for property would be in a housing project. I would be looking at a rual area where there is lots of trees to hang wire from and lots of ground to plant towers. Willee That is what I am in the process of doing now. As I was a ham when I bought my first house and was very much into VHF weak signal work I told the real estate agent the house had to be on a hill and no restrictions. He found me one that is about 200 feet above most of the county. As I would rather play radio than mow the grass, the second requirement was no restrictions on the land. I am now looking for another house or some land to build on after 25 years in this house. I have turned down several places just because of the height. Turned down one just because it was in a development that met most of the other requirements. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Ya see, Ralph, you got your ducks in a row.
You sat down and thought about what you wanted and went out after it. Sounds like you got a very good location there. If you plan to sell your present home I bet there are hams who would like to buy it .... if you leave the towers up. (grin) Willee "Ralph Mowery" wrote in message ... receiving antennas can be hidden quite well. Some of us are licensed ham and enjoy our hobby as you do. Just because we move into a new home in a new area why should we give up the hobby we so enjoy? Why, if ham radio is such an importaint part of your life, was it not included in your plans for a new home? If I wanted an antenna farm the last place I would look for property would be in a housing project. I would be looking at a rual area where there is lots of trees to hang wire from and lots of ground to plant towers. Willee That is what I am in the process of doing now. As I was a ham when I bought my first house and was very much into VHF weak signal work I told the real estate agent the house had to be on a hill and no restrictions. He found me one that is about 200 feet above most of the county. As I would rather play radio than mow the grass, the second requirement was no restrictions on the land. I am now looking for another house or some land to build on after 25 years in this house. I have turned down several places just because of the height. Turned down one just because it was in a development that met most of the other requirements. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message ... wrote in message ... That's how much you know about me. I don't sign leases. 'Doc wrote: The only one you can blame for this problem is your self. You signed the lease... 'Doc as much as this person defends the jack-booted thugs of HOA's, there must be something more to it that we don't know, wouldn't you say? All part of the fascist-izing of America.. whatever happened to "a man's home is his castle"? I can understand where people have a right to not want someone storing a dozen rusty cars on their front lawn, or allowing their grass to get 3' tall.. but as far as antennas, etc.. they have no business telling a homeowner what to do. It's not right that they should be telling people what color they can paint their house, what kind of plants or animals they can or cannot have, etc.. And how would you feel if the condition of the neighbor's house reduced the value of your house by $30,000? A homeowner aggress to covenants when they buy the house. They have to sign the paperwork. If you don't like the terms, look elsewhere. It is called living in a community, being part of the society. It is done all the time. You give up the right to drive on the wrong side of the road when you get your driving privileges. When I bought my current house, I made sure there were no silly antenna provisions. It wasn't hard. Also read the terms carefully, "... on the roof and visible from the front..." says towers are cool, roof mounts are not. Too many of these tales are 'me, me, me' and don't consider the others involved. Unless you live in an isolated area, you should consider being part of the community and not an irritant to the community. craigm |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed Price" wrote:
Read the rest of the ruling. It defines that the antenna may be located only in your private area (patio, balcony), not in the public or mutually owned areas (roof, outside wall). This makes it none too helpful for apartment and condo dwellers. Accept it; there are some hobbies that are incompatible with high-density dwellings. How does that chance anything I said, Ed? I said nothing about apartment and condo dwellers, and nothing about antenna location. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
"Dee D. Flint" wrote:
There are often good communities without covenants, where your property values do increase and the sale of a home is relatively easy. (snip) I agree, Dee. And, in addition, I've never heard of a house where the property value went down, or the property actually failed to sell, solely because of a neighbor's antenna. If anyone is aware of such a situation, I'd certainly like to see some evidence of it. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
I've also yet to have someone post information that can be validated
that a neighbor received a tax abatement [loss of property value] because a ham had an tower/antenna installation in the neighborhood. Deacon Dave Dwight Stewart wrote: I agree, Dee. And, in addition, I've never heard of a house where the property value went down, or the property actually failed to sell, solely because of a neighbor's antenna. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
WShoots1 wrote:
Mark: I certainly believe in buying a nice receiver, but honestly, the difference in performance I got switching from a horizontal loop near the house to a "Doty style" antenna that's 225 feet away from the house was more dramatic than you'd find if you compared the performance of my best military receiver with a decent portable if they both used the same antenna. Very interesting. Had you compared the performances of the mentioned receivers on each antenna? In other words, did you find that the "Doty" helped the portable more than it helped the military receiver? Or something like that. Bill, K5BY The only "portable" I'm using these days is an AOR 7030+ that's been mounted in a custom cabinet for portable operation. It wouldn't be a fair comparison. I've had three antenna systems over the last several years, and did a head to head check between the two antennas I had a few years ago with a Dak portable, and an R8. I think even Drew, who wrote those gushing ads for the DAK would agree the R8 is a much better radio, but when hooked to a 50-60 ft random wire stapled to the rafters of my attic, it couldn't hear signals the DAK could pick up with my 150 foot horizontal loop. The strongest signal on the attic antenna at those frequencies was RFI from all the electronic stuff in my house. The Loop antenna probably cost about $10 more to build than the attic random wire because it used more wire and I needed some rope to hold it up. And that's really my point - while a nicer radio is still worth having, most people will get the most bang for the buck from improving the antenna design and location. My only notes about the performance difference between the first two antennas are the Loop seemed to have double the signal strength, and half the noise floor of the attic wire. My "Doty" style antenna is just 65 feet long, but because of the distance from the house, the underground coax, and the impedance matching transformer, my Harris indicates the s/n ratio averages more than 20db better than the loop. Regards, Mark |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Outwitting Home Owner Associations/Condo Associations Regarding Antennas | Antenna | |||
Outwitting Home Owner Associations/Condo Associations Regarding Antennas | Scanner | |||
Outwitting Home Owner Associations/Condo Associations RegardingAntennas | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Home made antennas | Scanner |