![]() |
Very good points -- great post.
-- Stinger "ASW" wrote in message gy.com... First off, I really don't consider myself a republican, more of a constructionist than anything. I really do believe that this whole thing is politically motivated. As an example, what happened to Brett Farve when he admitted to abusing prescription drugs? I don't remember anyone requesting his medical records? And I sure and the hell don't remember any presecutors even "beginning" and investigation. So Brett Farve along with millions of other people who are hooked on "scripts" get a pass. (sorry for the pun), but Rush gets leaks to tabloids, blackmail that is not prosecuted, complete reversal of investigations, and the special attention of states presecutors. Does not seem very fair to me. Hell It would be different if Rush was caught with a bag full of hundreds of pills. But he wasn't. Ant |
Farve was an asshole for taking that sack so Strahan could get the
record... and Rush would take several hundred pills on a weekend - several hundred - think about it. On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:20:39 GMT, Gary Sanford wrote: On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:02:38 GMT, "ASW" wrote: First off, I really don't consider myself a republican, more of a constructionist than anything. I really do believe that this whole thing is politically motivated. As an example, what happened to Brett Farve when he admitted to abusing prescription drugs? I don't remember anyone requesting his medical records? And I sure and the hell don't remember any presecutors even "beginning" and investigation. So Brett Farve along with millions of other people who are hooked on "scripts" get a pass. (sorry for the pun), but Rush gets leaks to tabloids, blackmail that is not prosecuted, complete reversal of investigations, and the special attention of states presecutors. Does not seem very fair to me. Hell It would be different if Rush was caught with a bag full of hundreds of pills. But he wasn't. Ant But Farve is not an asshole....... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Gary Sanford |
Soliloquy wrote in message . 44...
"JC" wrote in : Payback time for what, his opinions? Ummm, yes. Rush is the moron who said that all drug abusers should be rounded up and thrown in prison. Are you saying this shouldn't apply to him? Why? Because he's a media hero and your guru? My my, this is mighty liberal of you, you're concerned about revenge against a person that has done nothing against you other than to hold opinions that are judgmental. Not just judgemental, absolutely stupid. And payback is a bitch, isn't it? But you are willing to let the people that actually adversely impact your life to get away with it without a whimper. (let's see, Bill Clinton come to mind, as does a cavalcade of other corrupt politicians, lying broadcast show hosts, deceiving doctors, etc.) Bill Clinton allegedly lied about a blow job. Rush Limbaugh DID lie about drug abuse. There is a difference, except in dumb conservative minds, I guess. As the jobs flow overseas, (yes, yes, Mr. Bush is increasingly to blame for this as well), as your Rights ebb away under this Patriot act or the other, as your guns are confiscated, as your health care coverage lapses, we'll all know that you got your priorities straight because one of the few things that inspired you to action was taking delight in the destruction of Rush. "W" is destroying himself through absolute stupidity. If you can't see that, you're a stupid as he is. I don't listen to Rush anymore, haven't for many years now. But, and I have a very big but, (From Pee Wee Herman's movie), if they apply undue attention to Rush, they need to revisit all of the other politicians, actors, and sports figures that have been caught up in similar misdoings. I never did, but I know he's a pompous jerk. And always was. But why would it be "undue" attention? If he's a fraud and a liar, it's certainly "due" attention. Unless you happen to be a dumbass "dittohead", of course. Then logic doesn't apply. Merry Christmas Merry pagan winter feast day to you, too. |
|
In article ,
Gary Sanford wrote: On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:02:38 GMT, "ASW" wrote: First off, I really don't consider myself a republican, more of a constructionist than anything. I really do believe that this whole thing is politically motivated. As an example, what happened to Brett Farve when he admitted to abusing prescription drugs? I don't remember anyone requesting his medical records? And I sure and the hell don't remember any presecutors even "beginning" and investigation. So Brett Farve along with millions of other people who are hooked on "scripts" get a pass. (sorry for the pun), but Rush gets leaks to tabloids, blackmail that is not prosecuted, complete reversal of investigations, and the special attention of states presecutors. Does not seem very fair to me. Hell It would be different if Rush was caught with a bag full of hundreds of pills. But he wasn't. Ant But Farve is not an asshole....... If being an asshole were sufficient grounds for incarceration, most the the current collection of nobodies trying for the Democratic nomination would be in jail. |
"nobody" wrote in message ... If being an asshole were sufficient grounds for incarceration, most the the current collection of nobodies trying for the Democratic nomination would be in jail. Let's not damn with faint praise here... so would most of the current administration.. but then, I figure that could easily be applied to nearly every politician on both sides of the spectrum... :) |
It is not whether the law was broken, it was.
In the case of Bill Clinton he obstructed justice, perjured himself, and tampered with witnesses. Rush obtained prescription drugs illegally, tampered with witnesses, and probably possesed enormous quantities of prescription drugs illegally. I am questioning the application of the law. Lets face it, anyone of us has broken a multitude of laws, some more serious than others. It just seems to me that there seems to be a special place in the heart of most liberals for Rush. My point was that if it were just about anyone else the prosecutor would have bailed on the case and forgot it. Your personal attacks against anyone that agrees with Rush just prove my point. Lets say that you are the states prosecutor. You would go after him with a vengeance. Well ok, so be it. How did you feel about Ken Star? Did you like that? Did you think that was fair? What I am talking about is the biased use of power. Anytime it used in this way it is bad. It makes a mockery out of our court systems and makes me rethink being politically or socially involved. I mean I could get a ticket for jaywalking because some police officer seen me in a social/public venue that he/she did not agree with. While at the same time a police man lets a guy off a speeding ticket because he is wearing a Mason's ring? Don't think it has happened? I know it has! (The Mason Ring example that is) Ant |
kt, Kt. KT !
"KT" Says (Writes): "Rush would take several hundred pills on a weekend - several hundred - think about it." OBTW: "KW" I like Your Style: AKA: th "-s" :o) IRT: Your Statement "KT" - Your NOSE is... G r o w i n g :o) "Wilma Cline, 42, says Limbaugh was Hooked on the Potent Prescription Drugs: OxyContin, Lorcet and Hydrocodone" Source= http://www.nydailynews.com/front/sto...p-110349c.html * Hydrocodone Anti-cough agent and painkiller similar to morphine. Side effects include anxiety, poor mental performance, emotional dependence, drowsiness, mood changes, difficulty breathing and itchiness. * Lorcet Brand Name for the combination of Tylenol and Hydrocodone, prescribed for moderate to severe pain. Side effects include dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, dizziness, tiredness, muscle twitches, sweating and itching. * OxyContin Potent time-release medication for relief of moderate to severe pain, known as hillbilly heroin because of black-market popularity in some rural areas. Side effects include drowsiness, dizziness, sweating, muscle twitches and decreased sex drive. TBL: A Large Dose Can Be FATAL. "The RUSH on Drugs" http://www.seattleweekly.com/feature...s_limbaugh.php Once again let us remember "KT" Says (Writes): "Rush would take several hundred pills on a weekend - several hundred - think about it." I Have Thought About It "KT". Lets get Real Here "KT" Several Hundred of Any One of these Pills would be a Death Sentence (Life Ending Drug Over Dose) for Anyone [.] Last Time I Checked: Rush Is Alive ! "Rush Limbaugh Supported Legalizing Drugs in 12 March 1998" Source= http://www.talkleft.com/archives/004605.html "Drug Policy Alliance Urges Rush Limbaugh to Use Power and Influence to Benefit Hundreds of Thousands of Fellow Addicts Languishing in Prison" Source= http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/press.../pr1118b03.cfm "America owes talk host Rush Limbaugh a debt of gratitude, - - - Libertarians say" Source= http://www.lp.org/press/archive.php?...iew&record=652 "Rush Limbaugh Statement on Prescription Pain Medication Stories" Make-A-Shorter-Link URL-Key= http://makeashorterlink.com/?X48B313E6 "Rush Limbaugh and the Hypocrisy Smokescreen" Source= http://www.commondreams.org/views03/1018-04.htm ssi ~ RHF = = = So Say I (My Personal Opinons and Beliefs Stated As Facts.) .. .. = = = Ken Thomas = = = wrote in message . .. Farve was an asshole for taking that sack so Strahan could get the record... and Rush would take several hundred pills on a weekend - several hundred - think about it. .. - S N I P - .. |
nobody wrote in message ...
In article , (Richard Cranium) wrote: Soliloquy wrote in message . 44... "JC" wrote in : Payback time for what, his opinions? Ummm, yes. Rush is the moron who said that all drug abusers should be rounded up and thrown in prison. Are you saying this shouldn't apply to him? No, but the law is. Do you think he should be put in jail for his opinions? Since he's the one who said it, Yes, I think it should apply especially to him. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com