Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 7th 04, 02:06 AM
Don Putnick
 
Posts: n/a
Default WSHB going QRT

I received a letter today from the Station Manager at WSHB. Here are a
couple excerpts:

"I am very sad to have to write to you today, to let you know that we will
cease our shortwave broadcasts on February 29, 2004"

"We are hoping that someone will come forward and purchase the station so
that we may continue our broadcasts, but so far we have not found anyone.
Should we be successful in finding a buyer, I will let you know as soon as I
can."

WSHB RIP


  #2   Report Post  
Old February 7th 04, 03:26 AM
tommyknocker
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don Putnick wrote:

I received a letter today from the Station Manager at WSHB. Here are a
couple excerpts:

"I am very sad to have to write to you today, to let you know that we will
cease our shortwave broadcasts on February 29, 2004"

"We are hoping that someone will come forward and purchase the station so
that we may continue our broadcasts, but so far we have not found anyone.
Should we be successful in finding a buyer, I will let you know as soon as I
can."

WSHB RIP


Isn't that "Harvest Broadcasting"? Just goes to show you how difficult
it is to run a SW station with paid programming, especially religious
and right wing. The broadcasters simply don't pay enough to keep the
juice on.

Now if only WWCR and WWRB would disappear...

  #3   Report Post  
Old February 7th 04, 03:45 AM
Frank Dresser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"tommyknocker" wrote in message
...

Isn't that "Harvest Broadcasting"? Just goes to show you how difficult
it is to run a SW station with paid programming, especially religious
and right wing. The broadcasters simply don't pay enough to keep the
juice on.



World Harvest Radio ended up with the old WCSN. They're now WHRA.

WCSN and WSHB were alot more interesting back when the Christian Science
Monitor had their Monitor Radio network going.


Now if only WWCR and WWRB would disappear...



NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!

Frank Dresser


  #4   Report Post  
Old February 7th 04, 05:51 AM
WShoots1
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frank D.: WCSN and WSHB were alot more interesting back when the Christian
Science Monitor had their Monitor Radio network going.

Ah yes. I'd forgotten all about Monitor Radio. That was a classy, informative
operation.

Bill, K5BY.
  #5   Report Post  
Old February 7th 04, 08:42 AM
Frank Dresser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"WShoots1" wrote in message
...

Ah yes. I'd forgotten all about Monitor Radio. That was a classy,

informative
operation.

Bill, K5BY.


Yes, it was. Unfortunately, it cost more than the Church wanted to
spend. As I understand, attempting to run a TV operation really drained
their funds quickly. They still have the Christian Science Monitor, but
I haven't seen one of those papers in years. It did have a reputation
for first rate journalism.

Frank Dresser




  #6   Report Post  
Old February 7th 04, 07:58 PM
Telamon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article
,
"Frank Dresser" wrote:

"WShoots1" wrote in message
...

Ah yes. I'd forgotten all about Monitor Radio. That was a classy,

informative
operation.

Bill, K5BY.


Yes, it was. Unfortunately, it cost more than the Church wanted to
spend. As I understand, attempting to run a TV operation really drained
their funds quickly. They still have the Christian Science Monitor, but
I haven't seen one of those papers in years. It did have a reputation
for first rate journalism.


No need to miss it.
http://www.csmonitor.com/

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #7   Report Post  
Old February 8th 04, 10:28 PM
Jim Moats
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ...
"WShoots1" wrote in message
...

Ah yes. I'd forgotten all about Monitor Radio. That was a classy,

informative
operation.

Bill, K5BY.


Yes, it was. Unfortunately, it cost more than the Church wanted to
spend. As I understand, attempting to run a TV operation really drained
their funds quickly. They still have the Christian Science Monitor, but
I haven't seen one of those papers in years. It did have a reputation
for first rate journalism.

Frank Dresser


According to a Boston " Globe " story last Thursday, CS church
officials plan to make changes to the print edition of the CSM
newspaper, as well as exploring the possibility of charging for
subscriptions for the online version. Church treasurer Walter D. Jones
said that the Church' s publishing and broadcasting division, the
Christian Science Publishing Society, must break even by 2008 and turn
a profit by 2009.
  #8   Report Post  
Old February 9th 04, 11:13 AM
Tom Sevart
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"tommyknocker" wrote in message
...

Now if only WWCR and WWRB would disappear...


Then shortwave wouldn't be any fun at all to listen to.


--
Tom Sevart N2UHC
Frontenac, KS
http://www.geocities.com/n2uhc


  #9   Report Post  
Old February 10th 04, 03:18 AM
Richard Cranium
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tom Sevart" wrote in message ...
"tommyknocker" wrote in message
...

Now if only WWCR and WWRB would disappear...


Then shortwave wouldn't be any fun at all to listen to.


Actually, it'll be a lot more fun to listen to! Get rid of all the
fundamentalist profits and shortwave will prosper.
  #10   Report Post  
Old February 10th 04, 03:24 AM
Frank Dresser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard Cranium" wrote in message
om...

Actually, it'll be a lot more fun to listen to! Get rid of all the
fundamentalist profits and shortwave will prosper.


Prosper in what way?

Frank Dresser




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017