Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Dresser wrote:
[...] Well, maybe, but I don't see the entire broadcast industry rushing to IBOC. The night time ban puts a big crimp on IBOC. IBOC reduces the bandwidth and fidelity of the main channel. Also, putting all that power into sideband noise reduces the power and signal to noise ratio of the main channel. People who are annoyed by bad sounding AM radio and have yet to buy an IBOC radio are more likely to tune out. People who don't much care about fidelity, and I think that's the majority of casual listeners, won't much care for IBOC, either. Frank Dresser All very true. But the owners of the media monopolies don't care a great deal about the success of IBOC or even its widespread implementation. Their main concern is to _prevent_ the creation of a new digital band wherein all existing broadcasters would have an even playing field. IBOC does that -- at least so far. With every good wish, Kevin. -- Kevin Alfred Strom. News: http://www.nationalvanguard.org/ The Works of R. P. Oliver: http://www.revilo-oliver.com Personal site: http://www.kevin-strom.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
FS: Palomar 225 | CB | |||
I also need Diy plans for a 300 watt linear | CB |