Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, "Frank Dresser" wrote: "Chuck Reti" wrote in message ... IBOC in the end has nothing to do with audio quality. If that really was the point we might have had a chunk of spectrum for Digital Radio like the DTV transition for video. IBOC is about Digital Rights Management, enabling others to decide what you may or may not hear or, God Forbid, record. -- chuck reti detroit mi Others already decide what is broadcast, and I don't see how digital modulation can keep anyone from recording audio. Just what does IBOC have to do with Digital Rights Management? Frank Dresser I'm just pessimistic and cynical about the Brave New future of digital broadcasting. IBOC as a "digital modulation" technique is not in itself the evil (well, OK, it spews hash across the AM dial), but as a transport for DRM-encoded digital content it may likely disable the listener from doing what is considered fair use recording. I could see the instance where one might not be able to "time shift" a program without a subscription or use fee. For sure not in the immediate future, but possible eventually. chuck reti detroit mi |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
FS: Palomar 225 | CB | |||
I also need Diy plans for a 300 watt linear | CB |