MWB,

See that is your PROBLEM "MWB" I chose to Post and Reply as "RHF"

But you TARGET and Attempt to Victimize Me By Posting a Message
with My "NAME" in the Subject Line.

You Show NO Repect For Anyone Here "MWB" [.]
= = = Therefore You Are Given No Respect.

When you recently 'posted' SW Reception Reports - Did I Not:
+ Commend You
+ Defend You
+ Encourage You
For attempting to return to your 'original' reason for being here on RRSW.


THE RHETORIC OF THE "OWLES"
MWB - Second of All - Do You Not Recognize the RHETORIC of the
"OWLES" One World Liberal ELITIST Socialists.

(o: These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the
Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.]

(o: BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges
"___" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a _______________ .

(o: PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A ___________________ .

(o: ___ - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer.

(o: "___" have you ever been . . . (3Xs)

(o: SEE "___" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a _____________ [.]

(o: Therefore "___" You Stand Convicted as a ______ In-Fact
of _______ or a De-Facto ________ of ________.

TBL - "MWB" you can not see the Humor in the "Rhetoric" of the
OWLES when it is applied to you. Can You ?

Everytime a Conservative is accused of anything, we are overwhelmed
by the Rhetoric of the OWLES. Whether they be so called "Democrats in
Name Only" (DINOs) or the the Elitist that make up the Liberal Media.


PLEASE NOTE "MWB":
That I End with a 'sincere' Statement of my Christian Beliefs:

My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "___"
[ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ]

___ - Let "US" Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the
Sickness of ______ - Amen


ir... ~ RHF
= = = I Remain... RHF [.]
..
..
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ...
From: (RHF)


SEE "MWB" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a Member of NAMBLA [.]


Sad behavior, RHF.

Since you claim to be a Christian, your behavior is behavior that you must know
you that you will be held accountable for.

I am a married father of a daughter in her twenties. How would you feel if your
children saw these types of claims made against you by people claiming to be
Christian?

I no longer believe your claims of being a Christian, Mr. Fisk. The way you act
and the things you say are not the actions or words of a Christian. Prove you
are a Christian, Mr. Fisk, because your actions suggest otherwise.

And to set the record straight - I am neither a member of NAMBLA or a
homosexual. An "indictment" carries the burden of proof. I am a teacher and my
past actions have been thoroughly investigated. To have such a respected member
of our community act the way you have is particularly reprehensible, Mr. Fisk.
The standards for an indictment on internet slander are different than they are
for internet harassment. I advise you, Mr. Fisk, to look them up.

This is my last response to you, Roy Fisk. The words (and the character behind
them) do not warrant any further response. I pray for your darkened soul.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

From: (RHF)

See that is your PROBLEM "MWB" I chose to Post and Reply as "RHF"

But you TARGET and Attempt to Victimize Me By Posting a Message
with My "NAME" in the Subject Line.

You Show NO Repect For Anyone Here "MWB" [.]
= = = Therefore You Are Given No Respect.

When you recently 'posted' SW Reception Reports - Did I Not:
+ Commend You
+ Defend You
+ Encourage You
For attempting to return to your 'original' reason for being here on RRSW.


THE RHETORIC OF THE "OWLES"
MWB - Second of All - Do You Not Recognize the RHETORIC of the
"OWLES" One World Liberal ELITIST Socialists.

(o: These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the
Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.]

(o: BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges
"___" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a _______________ .

(o: PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A ___________________ .

(o: ___ - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer.

(o: "___" have you ever been . . . (3Xs)

(o: SEE "___" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a _____________ [.]

(o: Therefore "___" You Stand Convicted as a ______ In-Fact
of _______ or a De-Facto ________ of ________.

TBL - "MWB" you can not see the Humor in the "Rhetoric" of the
OWLES when it is applied to you. Can You ?

Everytime a Conservative is accused of anything, we are overwhelmed
by the Rhetoric of the OWLES. Whether they be so called "Democrats in
Name Only" (DINOs) or the the Elitist that make up the Liberal Media.


PLEASE NOTE "MWB":
That I End with a 'sincere' Statement of my Christian Beliefs:

My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "___"
[ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ]

___ - Let "US" Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the
Sickness of ______ - Amen


ir... ~ RHF

RHF,

So, are you drunk? I don't think the gibberish above deserves any reply
whatsoever. There's something seriously wrong going on and you need to get real
help.

Good luck, RHF. We're all behind you. Way behind....


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: (RHF)

See that is your PROBLEM "MWB" I chose to Post and Reply as "RHF"

But you TARGET and Attempt to Victimize Me By Posting a Message
with My "NAME" in the Subject Line.

You Show NO Repect For Anyone Here "MWB" [.]
= = = Therefore You Are Given No Respect.

When you recently 'posted' SW Reception Reports - Did I Not:
+ Commend You
+ Defend You
+ Encourage You
For attempting to return to your 'original' reason for being here on RRSW.


THE RHETORIC OF THE "OWLES"
MWB - Second of All - Do You Not Recognize the RHETORIC of the
"OWLES" One World Liberal ELITIST Socialists.

(o: These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the
Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.]

(o: BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges
"___" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a _______________ .

(o: PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A ___________________ .

(o: ___ - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer.

(o: "___" have you ever been . . . (3Xs)

(o: SEE "___" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a _____________ [.]

(o: Therefore "___" You Stand Convicted as a ______ In-Fact
of _______ or a De-Facto ________ of ________.

TBL - "MWB" you can not see the Humor in the "Rhetoric" of the
OWLES when it is applied to you. Can You ?

Everytime a Conservative is accused of anything, we are overwhelmed
by the Rhetoric of the OWLES. Whether they be so called "Democrats in
Name Only" (DINOs) or the the Elitist that make up the Liberal Media.


PLEASE NOTE "MWB":
That I End with a 'sincere' Statement of my Christian Beliefs:

My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "___"
[ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ]

___ - Let "US" Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the
Sickness of ______ - Amen


ir... ~ RHF

RHF,

So, are you drunk?

Accusing everyone of being drunk tonight Fat Boy?

Are you projecting? Are you in fact drunk yourself?

I don't think the gibberish above deserves any reply
whatsoever.

Then why did you reply Fat Boy?

There's something seriously wrong going on and you need to get real
help.

Yes, you do indeed need to get help.

You're still projecting!

Now you just go roll your fat ass on the floor!

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

Vietnam Veterans Against Kerry

From: N8KDV

Then why did you reply Fat Boy?


OK, Ace Retardo, use your magic decoder ring and translate Roy's gibberish,
will you?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Then why did you reply Fat Boy?


OK, Ace Retardo, use your magic decoder ring and translate Roy's gibberish,
will you?

You didn't answer the question Fat Boy... why did you respond in the first
place?

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry

From: N8KDV

You didn't answer the question Fat Boy... why did you respond in the first
place?

Easy! To watch you make five more posts!

Your questions, to be honest, are so lame that they really don't deserve
responses.

Kerry Supporters Against Rude, Stupid Veterans,


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

On 12 Mar 2004 03:56:24 GMT, ocom (Michael Bryant)
wrote:



Kerry Supporters Against Rude, Stupid Veterans,


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)


Don't you mean "Loser drug addicts for Kerry"?

Tracy

Michael Bryant wrote:

Snip
Kerry Supporters Against Rude, Stupid Veterans,


You might want to change the name of that group.

In light of the way he's campaigning, at least two out of three of the words in back of "against" seem to apply to your candidate.

MWB,

"RHF, So, are you drunk? I don't think the gibberish above
deserves any reply whatsoever. There's something seriously
wrong going on and you need to get real help.
Good luck, RHF. We're all behind you. Way behind...."

MWB - Can't See the Humor.

MWB - Can't Understand the Logic.

MWB - Can't Recognize the Truth.

So... Attack and 'attempt' to Ridicule the Messenger.

Translation: "MWB" - You Lose - I WIN !


ir... ~ RHF
= = = I Remain... RHF )
..
..
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ...
From: (RHF)

See that is your PROBLEM "MWB" I chose to Post and Reply as "RHF"

But you TARGET and Attempt to Victimize Me By Posting a Message
with My "NAME" in the Subject Line.

You Show NO Repect For Anyone Here "MWB" [.]
= = = Therefore You Are Given No Respect.

When you recently 'posted' SW Reception Reports - Did I Not:
+ Commend You
+ Defend You
+ Encourage You
For attempting to return to your 'original' reason for being here on RRSW.


THE RHETORIC OF THE "OWLES"
MWB - Second of All - Do You Not Recognize the RHETORIC of the
"OWLES" One World Liberal ELITIST Socialists.

(o: These are Serious Charges; and the mer Seriousness of the
Charges DEMAND - That They Be Investigated [.]

(o: BUTT - Because of the Seriousness of these Charges
"___" You MUST Prove that In-Fact You are NOT a _______________ .

(o: PROVE THAT YOU ARE NOT A ___________________ .

(o: ___ - You Stand Indited - You Are Being Called To Answer.

(o: "___" have you ever been . . . (3Xs)

(o: SEE "___" You Can NOT Prove that You Are NOT a _____________ [.]

(o: Therefore "___" You Stand Convicted as a ______ In-Fact
of _______ or a De-Facto ________ of ________.

TBL - "MWB" you can not see the Humor in the "Rhetoric" of the
OWLES when it is applied to you. Can You ?

Everytime a Conservative is accused of anything, we are overwhelmed
by the Rhetoric of the OWLES. Whether they be so called "Democrats in
Name Only" (DINOs) or the the Elitist that make up the Liberal Media.


PLEASE NOTE "MWB":
That I End with a 'sincere' Statement of my Christian Beliefs:

My Christian Teachings - Tell Me That I Must Pray for You "___"
[ Condemn the Sin - Not The Sinner. ]

___ - Let "US" Pray Together that You will Be Delivered for the
Sickness of ______ - Amen


ir... ~ RHF

RHF,

So, are you drunk? I don't think the gibberish above deserves any reply
whatsoever. There's something seriously wrong going on and you need to get real
help.

Good luck, RHF. We're all behind you. Way behind....


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)