Michael Bryant wrote:

from: N8KDV

Nice try... but I gotcha!

The only thing you got is a lying problem. And your counter-effort is, as
usual, pathetic.

Once again, what did I lie about? No counter effort, simply the facts.

You do like facts don't you Mr. Debate Coach?

Good night, liar.

Good night fabricator!

From: N8KDV
Date: 3/9/04 1:43 AM Eastern

Damn! LOL! You suckered a (presumably) detail-oriented debate
coach?

Amazing isn't it! He walked right into the wall.


Talking to yourself, again, Steve?




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV
Date: 3/9/04 1:43 AM Eastern

Damn! LOL! You suckered a (presumably) detail-oriented debate
coach?

Amazing isn't it! He walked right into the wall.


Talking to yourself, again, Steve?

No retard, I was responding to JD's post. You really can't read can you?

From: N8KDV

You do like facts don't you Mr. Debate Coach?

I know one fact: I undrestand why you wouldn't promise to leave the group if I
produced real facts.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

You do like facts don't you Mr. Debate Coach?

I know one fact: I undrestand why you wouldn't promise to leave the group if I
produced real facts.

Yes, you did produce real facts! No doubt about it! However the facts you produced
had nothing to do with your claims!

Gotcha!

Stop the shuck-and-jive boy.



Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

You do like facts don't you Mr. Debate Coach?

I know one fact: I undrestand why you wouldn't promise to leave the group if I
produced real facts.

No, here is your post:

"You claimed, earlier, that you were invloved in efforts to monitor Pol Pot when
you were in the military. Going to deny thay, now? If I produce the original post
will you go away?"

You made no statement about producing 'real facts'.

Stop the shuck-and-jive.

In article ,
ocom says...
Steve denied making the post exactly one year from the day he made the post.

That's an interesting coincidence, no?

We're actually compiling a dossier on you, Steve.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)


Is it worth all that work?? I used to be amused by some of his posts,
now he's begining to bore/annoy me.

BDK

In article ,
says...


Michael 'I must be on drugs, I can't read' Bryant wrote:

Steve Lare,

You suggested I was on drugs for suggesting that you said you were involved in
the search for Pol Pot. Then how do you explain the dollowing archived post:
__________________________________________________ ___________
From: N8KDV )
Subject: "I always had this dream of seeing him in an orange prisoners jump
suit
View: Complete Thread (6 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: 2003-03-08 18:42:11 PST


Nobody You Know wrote:

wrote:



BBC is mute on this..
anyone else pick up anything...?


http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/w...den030307.html



No wonder we can't catch him, our blabbermouth news media keeps tipping him
off.

It's just a matter of time. It's difficult. I spent some time looking for Pol
Pot...never got him... that's the way it happens. This time though...
technology may trip up Mr. Bin Laden... I have my fingers crossed.
__________________________________________________ ______________

Short-term memory loss, Steve? Anyone can check out Google. Took me 60 seconds
to find the post.

Good for you fat boy. Now, let's deal with the facts. Here are your original posts:

"It's hilarious how you amuse yourself in such a stupid. Learn that in the
military. I mean you certainly had a lot of time on your hands while listening
to Pol Pot, right?"

And...

"You claimed, earlier, that you were invloved in efforts to monitor Pol Pot when
you were in the military. Going to deny thay, now? If I produce the original
post will you go away?"

Here was my response:

"I'm waiting fat boy, produce the post that said I was 'listening' to Pol Pot. I
was not 'listening to', nor was I involved in 'monitoring' Pol Pot".

Now as you can see I responded to your posts in an honest way.

You on the other hand cannot read nor comprehend. Do you see your error? No?

Well it's obvious that you do not understand the difference between the words
'looking for' and 'listening to' and 'monitoring'.

You claimed I was 'listening to'... and I denied that. You claimed I was
'monitoring'... and I denied that.

You have deluded yourself into thinking you've produced something. You have not!

Please stop your shuck-and-jive.






Seems like you're tap dancing Steve...

BDK

BDK wrote:

In article ,
says...


Michael 'I must be on drugs, I can't read' Bryant wrote:

Steve Lare,

You suggested I was on drugs for suggesting that you said you were involved in
the search for Pol Pot. Then how do you explain the dollowing archived post:
__________________________________________________ ___________
From: N8KDV )
Subject: "I always had this dream of seeing him in an orange prisoners jump
suit
View: Complete Thread (6 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: 2003-03-08 18:42:11 PST


Nobody You Know wrote:

wrote:



BBC is mute on this..
anyone else pick up anything...?


http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/w...den030307.html



No wonder we can't catch him, our blabbermouth news media keeps tipping him
off.

It's just a matter of time. It's difficult. I spent some time looking for Pol
Pot...never got him... that's the way it happens. This time though...
technology may trip up Mr. Bin Laden... I have my fingers crossed.
__________________________________________________ ______________

Short-term memory loss, Steve? Anyone can check out Google. Took me 60 seconds
to find the post.

Good for you fat boy. Now, let's deal with the facts. Here are your original posts:

"It's hilarious how you amuse yourself in such a stupid. Learn that in the
military. I mean you certainly had a lot of time on your hands while listening
to Pol Pot, right?"

And...

"You claimed, earlier, that you were invloved in efforts to monitor Pol Pot when
you were in the military. Going to deny thay, now? If I produce the original
post will you go away?"

Here was my response:

"I'm waiting fat boy, produce the post that said I was 'listening' to Pol Pot. I
was not 'listening to', nor was I involved in 'monitoring' Pol Pot".

Now as you can see I responded to your posts in an honest way.

You on the other hand cannot read nor comprehend. Do you see your error? No?

Well it's obvious that you do not understand the difference between the words
'looking for' and 'listening to' and 'monitoring'.

You claimed I was 'listening to'... and I denied that. You claimed I was
'monitoring'... and I denied that.

You have deluded yourself into thinking you've produced something. You have not!

Please stop your shuck-and-jive.






Seems like you're tap dancing Steve...

Really? In what way? I simply denied what he was stating at the time. He was fabricating,
and accusing me of stating what I did not indeed state.

If you don't understand that, then perhaps you lack the same reading and comprehension
skills as Michael Bryant.

Sorry if I have to put that in such a succinct manner, but I have only the facts to deal
with here.

If you go back and read Bryant's posts you'll see that he's been the one 'tap dancing'.
He twists words in every response.

Show me where I'm wrong!

Go Googling!

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

you said you were involved in
the search for Pol Pot.

- Whaaa ??
- Doubntful..
_ Probably a Cook, or a truck loader ,
or some " Admin typ guy."

Why else would he be so obsessed with this Stupid BS..

Something in Bryandt rings a bell with him, which he can't stand in himself
- & So
He lashes out at Bryandt
instead of loking withinn