I'm wondering if Pastor Peters could face liability in Canada under
their "hate speech" law, which was recently extended to cover sexual
orientation. The law does cover broadcast transmissions. It's
unlikely that he would ever actually become subject to Canadian arrest
(i.e., jurisdiction) by going there, and it might be doubtful that
they'd even acknowledge his broadcasts. However, his "speech" does
reach Canada, and appears to be pretty close to the type of thing they
are getting at, so he could face "technical" liability or possibly
indictment. Anyone know if any speech laws such as this have ever
been applied extraterritorially to SW broadcasters who cross borders?

Oh, Eventually they will be enforced extra territorially, by the U.N.
They seem to support everything else that God hates.

Before they prosecute Pastor Pete Peters, however, I suspect they'd
really like to prosecute God, or His Son Jesus Christ, for the urban
renewal program which took place at Sodom and Gomorrah.

Genesis 19:24, 25, "Then the Lord rained on Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone
and fire from the Lord out of heaven, and He overthrew those cities and
all the valley, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on
the ground." (NASB)

Ever wonder why they call homosexuality "Sodomy" ? Genesis 19 pretty
well tells it all. Seems our "judges" and politicians of today are
trying to see if God can give a repeat performance. I'm betting He is
very well able -- and just may prove it! :-)

Al

=======================

T. Early wrote:
I'm wondering if Pastor Peters could face liability in Canada under
their "hate speech" law, which was recently extended to cover sexual
orientation. The law does cover broadcast transmissions. It's
unlikely that he would ever actually become subject to Canadian arrest
(i.e., jurisdiction) by going there, and it might be doubtful that
they'd even acknowledge his broadcasts. However, his "speech" does
reach Canada, and appears to be pretty close to the type of thing they
are getting at, so he could face "technical" liability or possibly
indictment. Anyone know if any speech laws such as this have ever
been applied extraterritorially to SW broadcasters who cross borders?

"Al Patrick" wrote in message
...
Ever wonder why they call homosexuality "Sodomy" ? Genesis 19 pretty
well tells it all.

They don't call homosexuality "sodomy". Sodomy is a specific act, and is
not restricted to homosexuals. A great number of heterosexual couples
practice it, as well as other disapproved forms of sexual intercourse such
as fellatio and cunnilingus.

... as well as other disapproved forms of sexual intercourse such
as fellatio and cunnilingus.

Disapproved? Oh no!

Brenda Ann wrote:
"Al Patrick" wrote in message
...
Ever wonder why they call homosexuality "Sodomy" ? Genesis 19 pretty
well tells it all.

They don't call homosexuality "sodomy". Sodomy is a specific act,
and is not restricted to homosexuals. A great number of heterosexual
couples practice it, as well as other disapproved forms of sexual
intercourse such as fellatio and cunnilingus.

Guilty!

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

Al Patrick wrote:

...Genesis 19:24, 25,....

Wrong place here for religous preach...
Are you on air with it? Wich frequency?
No, I will NOT tune in.

RADIO

You can't separate "religion and politics" from your behavior because
religion and politics both influence your behavior and/or are a result
of your behavior. Check out Romans 1 and II Thess. 2 -- plus lots of
other references which may be referenced from those two. :-)

Al

===============

Volker Tonn wrote:

Al Patrick wrote:

...Genesis 19:24, 25,....


Wrong place here for religous preach...
Are you on air with it? Wich frequency?
No, I will NOT tune in.

RADIO

Al Patrick schrieb:

You can't separate "religion and politics"...

So go off with both from this place.
Have nothing read about your RADIO.

My radio is fine. That's where I learn about religion and politics. ;-)

=========

Volker Tonn wrote:


Al Patrick schrieb:

You can't separate "religion and politics"...


So go off with both from this place.
Have nothing read about your RADIO.

Far from "telling it all," Genesis 19 is pretty
darn cryptic about what it was that the
Sodom'n'Gomorrahites were flattened for.

It's apparent they wanted to commit homosexual rape
against the two angels, but probably any society that
would gang-rape two innocent wayfarers as a matter of
course would be subject to pretty extreme disapproval,
regardless of the sex of the victims. Seems to me that
Lot's offering his two daughters up as alternatives is
pretty unnatural in its own right, don't you think?

Defining Sodom and Gemorrah's "iniquity" as homosexuality
didn't occur until medieval times.


Al Patrick wrote:
Oh, Eventually they will be enforced extra territorially, by the U.N.
They seem to support everything else that God hates.

Before they prosecute Pastor Pete Peters, however, I suspect they'd
really like to prosecute God, or His Son Jesus Christ, for the urban
renewal program which took place at Sodom and Gomorrah.

Genesis 19:24, 25, "Then the Lord rained on Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone
and fire from the Lord out of heaven, and He overthrew those cities and
all the valley, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on
the ground." (NASB)

Ever wonder why they call homosexuality "Sodomy" ? Genesis 19 pretty
well tells it all. Seems our "judges" and politicians of today are
trying to see if God can give a repeat performance. I'm betting He is
very well able -- and just may prove it! :-)

Al