Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Excellent RHF! It is nice to know that intelligent life exists in this newsgroup, I was really beginning to wonder. I knew this wasn't the most progressive lot in the world but I've been a bit taken back by the scope of ignorance I've encountered. I don't know what the number of your IQ is but it is higher than mine - I missed 2 questions. Congrats on your accomplishment! I hope it provided a few minutes of entertainment for you. God Bless, Melvin Begging your pardon, Melvin, but how does publishing an "IQ test" without a key to score it by constitute progressive discourse? Rather seems a bit regressive to me. But then IQ is a funny critter that's over-rated anyway, at least in the common mythology. For example, animals like porpoises, pigs, horses, monkeys, dogs, et al, have measurable IQ's, that are, granted, lower than that of "normal" (another funny concept) human beings. However, these high IQ beings known as humans are actively destroying the planet on which we live whereas the other animals are not. So much for IQ... Now EQ is something a bit more useful but I'm not aware of an inventory that assesses it. I'd be curious to know if there is such a yardstick. 73 and good DX. Paul --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.637 / Virus Database: 408 - Release Date: 3/20/04 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"flipper" wrote in message et...
Begging your pardon, Melvin, but how does publishing an "IQ test" without a key to score it by constitute progressive discourse? Rather seems a bit regressive to me. But then IQ is a funny critter that's over-rated anyway, at least in the common mythology. For example, animals like porpoises, pigs, horses, monkeys, dogs, et al, have measurable IQ's, that are, granted, lower than that of "normal" (another funny concept) human beings. However, these high IQ beings known as humans are actively destroying the planet on which we live whereas the other animals are not. So much for IQ... Now EQ is something a bit more useful but I'm not aware of an inventory that assesses it. I'd be curious to know if there is such a yardstick. 73 and good DX. Paul ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Point well taken Paul. I agree with your take on IQ, it's VERY over-rated, more an ego thing than anything. I saw a study done about members of Mensa and it was interesting how few of them had any significant accomplishments in their lives and careers. And yes animals are superior to humans in so many ways, one of the many reasons I'm a vegatarian. You don't have to worry about animals robbing, raping, murdering, lying, cheating, either. Or any number of other charming traits we "superior" humans possess. They are God's gift to the world and even the Holy Bible tells us that not one sparrow dies without God taking note of it (Luke 12:6). EQ? Hmm...Yes I think that would be easier to quantify accurately than the proverbial, and vague, IQ. The amateur radio test required to receive a license serves as a measuring stick to some degree by covering a bit of electronics. One's ability to trouble shoot, read schematics, soldering, etc. could also be factored into the mix to determine one's EQ. Knowledge about ropagation, radio receivers, antennas, etc. also could be used. There are lot's of ways to weed out the pretenders. Thanks for the post Paul and all the best to you. 73's Melvin |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
FLIPPER,
"Now EQ is something a bit more useful..." Yes, the "EQ" mite be a bit more useful .... but you have failed to 'indentify' or Define "EQ". es ~ RHF .. .. = = = "flipper" wrote in message = = = et... Excellent RHF! It is nice to know that intelligent life exists in this newsgroup, I was really beginning to wonder. I knew this wasn't the most progressive lot in the world but I've been a bit taken back by the scope of ignorance I've encountered. I don't know what the number of your IQ is but it is higher than mine - I missed 2 questions. Congrats on your accomplishment! I hope it provided a few minutes of entertainment for you. God Bless, Melvin Begging your pardon, Melvin, but how does publishing an "IQ test" without a key to score it by constitute progressive discourse? Rather seems a bit regressive to me. But then IQ is a funny critter that's over-rated anyway, at least in the common mythology. For example, animals like porpoises, pigs, horses, monkeys, dogs, et al, have measurable IQ's, that are, granted, lower than that of "normal" (another funny concept) human beings. However, these high IQ beings known as humans are actively destroying the planet on which we live whereas the other animals are not. So much for IQ... Now EQ is something a bit more useful but I'm not aware of an inventory that assesses it. I'd be curious to know if there is such a yardstick. 73 and good DX. Paul --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.637 / Virus Database: 408 - Release Date: 3/20/04 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
RHF wrote in message om... FLIPPER, "Now EQ is something a bit more useful..." Yes, the "EQ" mite be a bit more useful ... but you have failed to 'indentify' or Define "EQ". es ~ RHF Sure, sorry about that. Where IQ stands for "Intelligence Quotient", EQ stands for "Emotional Quotient". Punch EQ into Google and you'll come up with myriad hits. It's an interesting topic. And there are other Quotients besides these two but the names escape me now. 73! Paul --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.637 / Virus Database: 408 - Release Date: 3/21/04 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|