RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Bush Backs Broadband (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/41545-bush-backs-broadband.html)

Mike Coslo March 29th 04 03:34 PM

Dee D. Flint wrote:

snippage

"Mike Coslo" wrote in message


So to me it is a very liberal idea to even attempt universal broadband
access, and since not many other choices are available for increasing
the number of choices, it by default includes BPL.

- Mike KB3EIA -



The universal access with multiple choices means very heavy investment as
now that could be construed to mean that BPL, DSL, cable, and WI-FI all need
set up in our rural areas to provide those choices. Guess what! Ain't
gonna happen.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Isn't that the truth!

- Mike KB3EIA -


reasonable doubt March 29th 04 09:38 PM

HF spectrum anyway. So much for secure connections. Now do you all
understand what is REALLY going on?

Dan/W4NTI


You betcha, though it's ironic how few Americans in this "well informed"
environment have any inkling as to what's actually happening in this good
'ole USofA. Reliable news feeds are available and anyone can look, but it's
remarkable how few people can connect the dots. History is repeating itself.
Problem is, it's only been 50 years since the fall of the Reich; way too
short a time for an encore, but here we are.

Read and be educated, folks...

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/index.html

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/

http://www.truthout.com/





---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.644 / Virus Database: 412 - Release Date: 3/26/04



Jim Hampton March 30th 04 03:30 AM


"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
...

The universal access with multiple choices means very heavy investment as
now that could be construed to mean that BPL, DSL, cable, and WI-FI all

need
set up in our rural areas to provide those choices. Guess what! Ain't
gonna happen.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Dee, correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't there available direct satellite
internet available? As long as one has an unobstructed view to the
Southwestern sky? (I subscribe to Direct TV - but use DSL as it only costs
me $29.95 per month). I think it runs $49.95 per month (the same as DSL
costs in Sun City, Florida). As far as broadband over powerline, we all
know it isn't going to happen in rural areas. I'm really curious about
those broadcasters with deep pockets and what will happen to channel 2 and 3
television. Of course, analog tv is on its' way out which will probably
save BPLs real quick demise .... maybe.

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.645 / Virus Database: 413 - Release Date: 3/28/04



Dee D. Flint March 30th 04 04:37 AM


"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
...

The universal access with multiple choices means very heavy investment

as
now that could be construed to mean that BPL, DSL, cable, and WI-FI all

need
set up in our rural areas to provide those choices. Guess what! Ain't
gonna happen.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Dee, correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't there available direct satellite
internet available? As long as one has an unobstructed view to the
Southwestern sky? (I subscribe to Direct TV - but use DSL as it only

costs
me $29.95 per month). I think it runs $49.95 per month (the same as DSL
costs in Sun City, Florida). As far as broadband over powerline, we all
know it isn't going to happen in rural areas. I'm really curious about
those broadcasters with deep pockets and what will happen to channel 2 and

3
television. Of course, analog tv is on its' way out which will probably
save BPLs real quick demise .... maybe.

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA


I imagine it is available in some areas. However I was attempting to make
the point that it will not be economically feasible to provide the same wide
variety of choices to a rural area as a metropolitan area. A rural area
will be more limited in the internet access choices to pick from.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Alun March 30th 04 11:37 AM

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in
:


"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
...

The universal access with multiple choices means very heavy
investment as now that could be construed to mean that BPL, DSL,
cable, and WI-FI all need set up in our rural areas to provide those
choices. Guess what! Ain't gonna happen.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Dee, correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't there available direct satellite
internet available? As long as one has an unobstructed view to the
Southwestern sky? (I subscribe to Direct TV - but use DSL as it only
costs me $29.95 per month). I think it runs $49.95 per month (the
same as DSL costs in Sun City, Florida). As far as broadband over
powerline, we all know it isn't going to happen in rural areas. I'm
really curious about those broadcasters with deep pockets and what
will happen to channel 2 and 3 television. Of course, analog tv is on
its' way out which will probably save BPLs real quick demise ....
maybe.

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA


I imagine it is available in some areas. However I was attempting to
make the point that it will not be economically feasible to provide the
same wide variety of choices to a rural area as a metropolitan area. A
rural area will be more limited in the internet access choices to pick
from.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE



The cheapest satellite Internet access in the US is Starband, which is
$40/mo for 768k speed. However, the combined cost of equipment and setup is
$600!!! This is why I still have dialup, no other broadband being
available. It is possible to find the equipment used (some people sell it
when they get DSL or cable in their area), but the setup fee is still $240.
That's not a typo, it's $240 for setup, not $24.

In my case I think both DSL and cable are available on the other side of
the street! One friend suggested I should get Wi-Fi and link into one of my
neighbours, paying a cut towards their broadband bill. He knows someone
who linked their house with their business premises by Wi-Fi, but says they
lose the connection when it rains!

BPL is set to cost only about as much as DSL and maybe nothing to install.
Some people would go for it just because they don't have a spare 600 bucks
to buy and set up a satellite system. I would almost be tempted if it
wasn't for ham radio. Cable Internet is $55/mo here. That includes $15/mo
for basic cable TV, whether you want it or not. DSL is $35/mo. I am sure
that some people would try BPL instead, as it doesn't need extra wires or
Wi-Fi.

73 de Alun, N3KIP


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com