![]() |
Lawrence H. Bulk wrote:
That said, it is apparent that the quality-control problems have not been solved, Eton's spokesperson(s) to the contrary. There are two solutions: one is to return (and keep returning) defective units until you get one "right;" you must insist that the company pay for return shipping (inquire about this before the purchase) or buy it locally. (If you purchase one from Universal Radio, they will test it for you on request before shipping; this ensures that your particular unit is satisfactory.) Second is to buy a Drake-refurbished unit as available. Not only is that cheaper, you know it will be "right." Several companies offer this. Good thing I'm so close to where Universal is located. I however was lucky enough to get a decent unit. :D Jeff Seale Louisville, KY S800, YB-550PE, Pro95, BC780XLT |
|
|
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV You'd have to fill me in on being lonely Fat Boy... I'm sure you're experienced! LOL! Let's see... You sit at home, unmarried, listening to the radio pretty much 24/7. That's a fabrication on your part Fat Boy! I'm married, have a family and teach dozens of different students, daily. So? Can you document that? When did you re-marry? Who sounds lonelier? Easy call. Even for a Grand Valley grad.... I think you sound lonelier Fat Boy! And I'm sure you are! |
N8KDV wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: krackula ha hah ah aha ha ......... probably a LOT better than poor old Covington ......which has gone down hill so much. I liked the nice river area development in Louisville ... where I live would be a desert if it wasn't for irrigation. Yep. I moved back to Kentucky in Dec 2001 after spending 20 years outside the state, the last 14 in northern Utah. So how long ago was it then that you attended Wayne State? (And lived in the slums of Detroit). If it was prior to the 14 years you lived in Utah then you certainly knew long before 2001 that you had not received the PhD. Hmmmmmmmmmmm... Can you tell us exactly when you attended Wayne State? Or is that another Fat Boy secret or fabrication? |
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV You sit at home, unmarried, listening to the radio pretty much 24/7. That's a fabrication on your part Fat Boy! Pretty easy to check. Just check the times you've posted to the NG. It's DOCUMENTED. I'm married, have a family and teach dozens of different students, daily. So? Can you document that? When did you re-marry? Try harder, Steve. Simply asking for documentation on everything doesn't disprove. Pop for $25 and have that ivestigative report ran. Oh, that's right, you haven't been able to research an address, right? Loser.... Well loser boy, you already stated you got the results back on me... Who sounds lonelier? Easy call. Even for a Grand Valley grad.... I think you sound lonelier Fat Boy! And I'm sure you are! Steve, not even the people that support you believe you leave the house very often. And, except for that one drive to Ohio, you do admit that you're unemployed. So, I'm not employed on a regular basis (by the way, I just sold 1000 shares of Microsoft this afternoon!). Not a crime, not even a lie! I leave the house many times a day Fat Boy... once again another facile fabrication on your part! You are an idiot who has lied about having a PhD, you're the same idiot who claimed my wife left me, you're the same idiot who claimed I made some incorrect statements about Pol Pot... The list goes on and on... you've been proven wrong on every count! Get some better meds Fat Boy! |
|
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV You sit at home, unmarried, listening to the radio pretty much 24/7. That's a fabrication on your part Fat Boy! Pretty easy to check. Just check the times you've posted to the NG. It's DOCUMENTED. So why don't you provide the proof? How do you know what I'm doing Fat Boy? You're just jealous that's all. Another Fat Boy liberal... jealous as hell! I can go for days at a time without ever turning the SW on... depends upon the season. You get back to me when you got some experience and credibility in the hobby! |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV You sit at home, unmarried, listening to the radio pretty much 24/7. That's a fabrication on your part Fat Boy! Pretty easy to check. Just check the times you've posted to the NG. It's DOCUMENTED. I'm married, have a family and teach dozens of different students, daily. So? Can you document that? When did you re-marry? Try harder, Steve. Simply asking for documentation on everything doesn't disprove. Pop for $25 and have that ivestigative report ran. Oh, that's right, you haven't been able to research an address, right? Loser.... The only loser here is some sorry Fat Boy who tries to make himself look better by trying to tell the world that he has a PhD when he does not indeed have one! You've been a loser your entire life, ever since you were on your daddy's shoulders supposedly witnessing some Klan event. It's coloured your entire life! Now you feel as though it is ok to fabricate anything you desire... Keep trying Liberal loser... those of us on the right, and in the right have no need to fabricate or distort the truth! |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV You sit at home, unmarried, listening to the radio pretty much 24/7. That's a fabrication on your part Fat Boy! Pretty easy to check. Just check the times you've posted to the NG. It's DOCUMENTED. I'm married, have a family and teach dozens of different students, daily. So? Can you document that? When did you re-marry? Try harder, Steve. Simply asking for documentation on everything doesn't disprove. Afraid to tell us when you re-married Fat Boy? Afraid you might get caught in a lie? |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Yeah Fat Boy... I'm may be a moron, but you lied about having a PhD! You still don't know what you're talking about. You're just embarassed over only having a Bachelors degree from that renowned institute known as Grand Valley State.... Hey, with all this free time that unemployment has provided you, maybe you could work on an advanced degree.... Better than being a lonely grouch, I bet.... And the truth is Fat Boy... I live in my own home, I make my house payments, I pay my bills.. Some liberal assholes such as yourself have a problem with that! |
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , Dan wrote: In article , longwave wrote: He doesn't need to own both radios to evaluate them. You conveniently snipped the part where he made a direct comparison using the same antenna and found that the 800 could hear anything the R75 was receiving and with better audio. He made up his mind based on real world evidence. That's the best anyone can do. Indeed. If anyone cares, I will be taking delivery of a new 800 and a little used 700 this week (probably Tuesday, 4/13). I will be doing extensive comparisons with my other radios, and will be happy to report my findings. What I find interesting is in another thread someone compared his $60 dollar Chinese portable to his IC-R75 and found that it heard everything the IC-R75 did. I've done some thinking on this "one radio hears a station and the other didn't" situation when the sensitivity of the radios are within a few dBm of each other. Normally it would not be reasonable to expect this result. I think the reason has to do with the radios input impedance changing over frequency and not looking like a resistive load. With an antenna not matched well on one end of a coax and the radio not being a good match on some frequencies on the other end results can be unpredictable with resonances at different frequencies for the different radios. This will lead to unpredictable results. In order to flatten out the response of the antenna / coax an attenuator could be used absorb the reflections in the antenna system. -- Telamon Ventura, California Could be -- but I think it's more likely just a combination of wishful thinking and enthusiasm getting in the way of objectivity. The radios they're talking about (Kaito 1102 / Degen 1102) are extremely good values at twice their price (I have the Kaito 1102). But some of the stuff I was reading made me laugh out loud. -- Stinger |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV You sit at home, unmarried, listening to the radio pretty much 24/7. That's a fabrication on your part Fat Boy! Pretty easy to check. Just check the times you've posted to the NG. It's DOCUMENTED. I'm married, have a family and teach dozens of different students, daily. So? Can you document that? When did you re-marry? Try harder, Steve. Simply asking for documentation on everything doesn't disprove. Pop for $25 and have that ivestigative report ran. Oh, that's right, you haven't been able to research an address, right? Loser.... Who sounds lonelier? Easy call. Even for a Grand Valley grad.... I think you sound lonelier Fat Boy! And I'm sure you are! Steve, not even the people that support you believe you leave the house very often. And, except for that one drive to Ohio, you do admit that you're unemployed. You've already provided all the necessary documentation! Everythings gonna be all right Fat Boy! Just take those meds like your doctor says... You know what I mean? Don't lie now! |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV You'd have to fill me in on being lonely Fat Boy... I'm sure you're experienced! LOL! Let's see... You sit at home, unmarried, listening to the radio pretty much 24/7. And you Fat Boy? You've sat at home pretty much your entire life eating Cheetos... You have no idea of what it means to be a warrior in any sense of the word... You claim to be Cherokee... you are a fraud... What we call here an 'apple'... Red on the outside... white on the inside... No one I know here associated with any tribe would have anything to to do with a liar and fabricator such as your self. You would be shunned. |
From: N8KDV
From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV Geez, Steve. Having fun ****ing all over yourself? Quick, they got meds for that..... It's always great to come home from my evening class and see that you've kept yourself busy, Steve. My students really get some laughs out of your posts. They thought the Commandante Zero stuff was the biggest Freudian slip they've ever seen! Keep up the excellent work! Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
In article ,
N8KDV wrote: Michael Bryant wrote: From: krackula ha hah ah aha ha ......... probably a LOT better than poor old Covington ......which has gone down hill so much. I liked the nice river area development in Louisville ... where I live would be a desert if it wasn't for irrigation. Yep. I moved back to Kentucky in Dec 2001 after spending 20 years outside the state, the last 14 in northern Utah. So how long ago was it then that you attended Wayne State? (And lived in the slums of Detroit). If it was prior to the 14 years you lived in Utah then you certainly knew long before 2001 that you had not received the PhD. That's because in a way Bryant is everyman. He has lived in the slums and yet aspires to acquire a double Ph.D. Then to make matters worse he ended up with P. H. D. but that's another story. Speaking of stories he has plenty. And did I mention he's also beyond time and place. Why deal with boring reality when a better one can be fabricated. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: N8KDV So how long ago was it then that you attended Wayne State? (And lived in the slums of Detroit). If it was prior to the 14 years you lived in Utah then you certainly knew long before 2001 that you had not received the PhD. Duh. It's obvious that you 1.) Understand little about how one works toward a PhD and that 2.) You are bored and looking to keep a fight going. We are all having a hard time keeping up with your imagination. Why don't you take another drive to Ohio? It's obvious that you need something besides your Drake to keep you occupied. He actually has radios and spends time listening them. I know that in your imagination you can with great rapidity hear many distant stations but when someone has to use real radios and take the time to verify what they are hearing; well it takes some time. Get a life, Steve. He seems to have one from here. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV Geez, Steve. Having fun ****ing all over yourself? Quick, they got meds for that..... It's always great to come home from my evening class and see that you've kept yourself busy, Steve. My students really get some laughs out of your posts. They thought the Commandante Zero stuff was the biggest Freudian slip they've ever seen! And I'm sure you've shown your supposed students the fact that you've lied about your PhD! Keep lying to us! |
Telamon wrote: In article , ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: N8KDV So how long ago was it then that you attended Wayne State? (And lived in the slums of Detroit). If it was prior to the 14 years you lived in Utah then you certainly knew long before 2001 that you had not received the PhD. Duh. It's obvious that you 1.) Understand little about how one works toward a PhD and that 2.) You are bored and looking to keep a fight going. We are all having a hard time keeping up with your imagination. Why don't you take another drive to Ohio? It's obvious that you need something besides your Drake to keep you occupied. He actually has radios and spends time listening them. I know that in your imagination you can with great rapidity hear many distant stations but when someone has to use real radios and take the time to verify what they are hearing; well it takes some time. Get a life, Steve. He seems to have one from here. Indeed I do! Just proved it a few ago with my old friend Kathy! LOL! The 'ol boy still got it! Damn! |
In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV From: N8KDV Geez, Steve. Having fun ****ing all over yourself? Quick, they got meds for that..... It's always great to come home from my evening class and see that you've kept yourself busy, Steve. My students really get some laughs out of your posts. They thought the Commandante Zero stuff was the biggest Freudian slip they've ever seen! Keep up the excellent work! You would never show anyone you knew these posts. You are an embarrassment. But since you have come up with this idea more than once maybe someone should indicate to your students and facelty alike your posting behavior. Your public display reflects upon the institution were you serve as an instructor. I'd like to call you Professor but you don't have that double Ph.D. now do you. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
|
|
In article ,
"Stinger" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , Dan wrote: In article , longwave wrote: He doesn't need to own both radios to evaluate them. You conveniently snipped the part where he made a direct comparison using the same antenna and found that the 800 could hear anything the R75 was receiving and with better audio. He made up his mind based on real world evidence. That's the best anyone can do. Indeed. If anyone cares, I will be taking delivery of a new 800 and a little used 700 this week (probably Tuesday, 4/13). I will be doing extensive comparisons with my other radios, and will be happy to report my findings. What I find interesting is in another thread someone compared his $60 dollar Chinese portable to his IC-R75 and found that it heard everything the IC-R75 did. I've done some thinking on this "one radio hears a station and the other didn't" situation when the sensitivity of the radios are within a few dBm of each other. Normally it would not be reasonable to expect this result. I think the reason has to do with the radios input impedance changing over frequency and not looking like a resistive load. With an antenna not matched well on one end of a coax and the radio not being a good match on some frequencies on the other end results can be unpredictable with resonances at different frequencies for the different radios. This will lead to unpredictable results. In order to flatten out the response of the antenna / coax an attenuator could be used absorb the reflections in the antenna system. Could be -- but I think it's more likely just a combination of wishful thinking and enthusiasm getting in the way of objectivity. The radios they're talking about (Kaito 1102 / Degen 1102) are extremely good values at twice their price (I have the Kaito 1102). But some of the stuff I was reading made me laugh out loud. Well, I meant tabletop radio comparisons. I did not mean to extend it to the portables but you have to agree that somewhere between these extremes the truth must lie. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: CommandanteZero And I'm sure you've shown your supposed students the fact that you've lied about your PhD! Keep lying to us! Well, of course they've seen this thread. They know how stupid you're acting. Most of them think you're like the old grouchy guys that stands out in the street cursing cars and thinking he's tough because they swerve around him.... Pathetic, in a word. Keep lying Fat Boy... you've shown them nothing! And the only FBI you've spoken to is the FBI in your addled brain... I think we can all believe that! |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: CommandanteZero Indeed I do! Just proved it a few ago with my old friend Kathy! LOL! The 'ol boy still got it! Damn! Can you document that. Did you tweek her passbands? You are so pitifully juvenile that it's impossible to not laugh. The only thing more hilarious is Tele-Nazi. Though he scares the students. They think you're just funny, Steve! Nobody is funnier than a Fat Boy who poses as a PhD and doesn't have one! You are an 'apple' Fat Boy.... |
|
In article ,
ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote: From: CommandanteZero Indeed I do! Just proved it a few ago with my old friend Kathy! LOL! The 'ol boy still got it! Damn! Can you document that. Did you tweek her passbands? You are so pitifully juvenile that it's impossible to not laugh. The only thing more hilarious is Tele-Nazi. Though he scares the students. They think you're just funny, Steve! Yeah, I just scare the hell out of people. Yup that's what friends, family and coworkers say about me that I'm just plain scary. No telling what I might do. I'd like to know what I did to earn the "Nazi" part and why I'm sooo... scary to you. If you need to depersonalize the reason through the device of your making like "your students" feel free. Well at least you still have some room in your head for a little humor resting beside that huge imagination. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
In article ,
says... On 9 Apr 2004 20:06:28 -0700, (Gary) wrote: B Banton wrote in message My 800 hums slightly when I turn the light on. Does a sync detector help with that? My battery indicator flashes after about 3 hours of use. Does turning the gain control up have an effect on that? My 800 can't display the letters USB. How would you have me fix that? They doubled up the BATT and Attenuate letters. Do you know that? I can't turn the damn volume knob past 3 before sound distorts. Care to tell me why they included volume control past that point? Even past the half-way point? The 800 is an absolute mess. For anyone to defend it is absolutely incredible IMO. And just another reason why mediocrity is becoming acceptable. Tell Grundig to stuff that unit up their ever loving a**. Regards I'd say you have a defective unit. As far as the display not displaying the letters USB - that was taken directly from the Drake SW8 which also cannot display the letters USB. Some of the early sets, including mine, have a bad adjustment for the battery indicator and it flashes, like you say, after about 3 hours of use. That was corrected on later units, so I understand. The other problems you have seem to be on your set as I do not have those problems with mine. "snip" I've run my Sat 800 (second series) for the last year on a car battery. The supply voltage as listed in the manual is 9 volts, but cast in plastic above the supply input jack is "9-15 volts". The radio is very happy with even a fully charged battery at 13.8 v and will last for *weeks* of my teenager listening to loud rock music between charges. |
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:52:45 -0400, William Mutch
wrote: In article , says... On 9 Apr 2004 20:06:28 -0700, (Gary) wrote: B Banton wrote in message My 800 hums slightly when I turn the light on. Does a sync detector help with that? My battery indicator flashes after about 3 hours of use. Does turning the gain control up have an effect on that? My 800 can't display the letters USB. How would you have me fix that? They doubled up the BATT and Attenuate letters. Do you know that? I can't turn the damn volume knob past 3 before sound distorts. Care to tell me why they included volume control past that point? Even past the half-way point? The 800 is an absolute mess. For anyone to defend it is absolutely incredible IMO. And just another reason why mediocrity is becoming acceptable. Tell Grundig to stuff that unit up their ever loving a**. Regards I'd say you have a defective unit. As far as the display not displaying the letters USB - that was taken directly from the Drake SW8 which also cannot display the letters USB. Some of the early sets, including mine, have a bad adjustment for the battery indicator and it flashes, like you say, after about 3 hours of use. That was corrected on later units, so I understand. The other problems you have seem to be on your set as I do not have those problems with mine. "snip" I've run my Sat 800 (second series) for the last year on a car battery. The supply voltage as listed in the manual is 9 volts, but cast in plastic above the supply input jack is "9-15 volts". The radio is very happy with even a fully charged battery at 13.8 v and will last for *weeks* of my teenager listening to loud rock music between charges. -------------- 9-15 volts; interesting! I bought one of the first available S800s from Sharper Image (Still works like a champ with a very quiet 400' loop, everyday). The plastic on mine, by the input, reads DC 9V. I do run mine on a garden tractor/snowmobile battery but use an RS DC-DC converter to get 9V @900ma output. In addition I keep a 50w solar panel connected to the battery. Maintenance on the whole deal is to add a little distilled water to the battery every couple years and occasionally soap/rinse spray the solar panel on the roof. Was tempted at first to chance running the receiver straight off the 12V too, but opted to be gentle on the components. Any comment out there on detrimental effects of higher voltage use? Or, what's best for the radio. Great radios ain't they? bball Sat800, 400' loop @15' height, AD Sloper (not as good), MFJ 959B for good matching, switching, occ amplification. |
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:52:45 -0400, William Mutch wrote: In article , says... I've run my Sat 800 (second series) for the last year on a car battery. The supply voltage as listed in the manual is 9 volts, but cast in plastic above the supply input jack is "9-15 volts". The radio is very happy with even a fully charged battery at 13.8 v and will last for *weeks* of my teenager listening to loud rock music between charges. -------------- 9-15 volts; interesting! I bought one of the first available S800s from Sharper Image (Still works like a champ with a very quiet 400' loop, everyday). The plastic on mine, by the input, reads DC 9V. I do run mine on a garden tractor/snowmobile battery but use an RS DC-DC converter to get 9V @900ma output. In addition I keep a 50w solar panel connected to the battery. Maintenance on the whole deal is to add a little distilled water to the battery every couple years and occasionally soap/rinse spray the solar panel on the roof. Was tempted at first to chance running the receiver straight off the 12V too, but opted to be gentle on the components. Any comment out there on detrimental effects of higher voltage use? Or, what's best for the radio. The only componant(s) that would experience the higher voltage would be the main voltage regulator which is apparently designed to handle an input voltage of up to 15-V. The '800' actually has an internal DC to DC converter which steps up the nominal 9-V input voltage to 15-V for certain circuits that need a higher voltage. There must be something in the owner's manual regarding the maximum input voltage. Now you have me wondering if my Drake-SW8, which was the prototype for the '800', could be run on 12-V instead of 9-V. I'll have to check the manual and schematic. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 01:24:02 -0400, starman wrote:
------- clip The only componant(s) that would experience the higher voltage would be the main voltage regulator which is apparently designed to handle an input voltage of up to 15-V. The '800' actually has an internal DC to DC converter which steps up the nominal 9-V input voltage to 15-V for certain circuits that need a higher voltage. There must be something in the owner's manual regarding the maximum input voltage. Now you have me wondering if my Drake-SW8, which was the prototype for the '800', could be run on 12-V instead of 9-V. I'll have to check the manual and schematic. A practical implication here is that if one desired to use the huge S800 as a portable, a practical power supply might be a long, slim 12V gell cell/SLA battery to fit in the battery compartment. Two 6V 1.3A (3-3/4x2x1") gell cells will almost fit in there after removing the receiver terminals. I'll experiment on playtime but suspect only about 4-5 hours on the series gell cells. Otherwise, it's not that difficult to saw a hole in the battery compartment and put a larger gell cell in there. Please check SW8 power and let us know if you think 12V may be allright. bball |
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 01:24:02 -0400, starman wrote: ------- clip The only componant(s) that would experience the higher voltage would be the main voltage regulator which is apparently designed to handle an input voltage of up to 15-V. The '800' actually has an internal DC to DC converter which steps up the nominal 9-V input voltage to 15-V for certain circuits that need a higher voltage. There must be something in the owner's manual regarding the maximum input voltage. Now you have me wondering if my Drake-SW8, which was the prototype for the '800', could be run on 12-V instead of 9-V. I'll have to check the manual and schematic. A practical implication here is that if one desired to use the huge S800 as a portable, a practical power supply might be a long, slim 12V gell cell/SLA battery to fit in the battery compartment. Two 6V 1.3A (3-3/4x2x1") gell cells will almost fit in there after removing the receiver terminals. I'll experiment on playtime but suspect only about 4-5 hours on the series gell cells. Otherwise, it's not that difficult to saw a hole in the battery compartment and put a larger gell cell in there. Please check SW8 power and let us know if you think 12V may be allright. bball You wouldn't have to use the battery compartment. There's enough room inside the '800' case, on the speaker end, for a 12-V rechargeable battery. The SW8 manual says the power supply voltage should be in the range of 7-10 volts. I gave the schematic a cursory look. The nominal 9-V power input doesn't seem to pass through a common voltage regulator before branching out to other voltage regulators or unregulated circuits. If this is the case, it would require installing a primary voltage regulator so it could handle a 12-V input. That wouldn't be difficult using a three pin IC regulator which was set to operate at 9-V but the power loss in that regulator would decrease the operating time for an external 12-V battery. I'll study the schematic some more to see what the options may be. Someone said the '800' has writing on the rear of the case that indicates it can handle up to 15-V input. I have a JPG copy of the '800' schematic so I'll check it out too. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
I still like C.Crane's NiMH "D" cells. 6 fully charged ones give 30-40
hours of play time. I had my battery meter adjusted to work with 1.2V batteries instead of 1.5V so I don't see the blinking "BATT" indicator, but the indicator has no effect on the run-time. With these batteries, no modification to the radio is necessary. Lawrence wrote in message . .. On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 01:24:02 -0400, starman wrote: ------- clip The only componant(s) that would experience the higher voltage would be the main voltage regulator which is apparently designed to handle an input voltage of up to 15-V. The '800' actually has an internal DC to DC converter which steps up the nominal 9-V input voltage to 15-V for certain circuits that need a higher voltage. There must be something in the owner's manual regarding the maximum input voltage. Now you have me wondering if my Drake-SW8, which was the prototype for the '800', could be run on 12-V instead of 9-V. I'll have to check the manual and schematic. A practical implication here is that if one desired to use the huge S800 as a portable, a practical power supply might be a long, slim 12V gell cell/SLA battery to fit in the battery compartment. Two 6V 1.3A (3-3/4x2x1") gell cells will almost fit in there after removing the receiver terminals. I'll experiment on playtime but suspect only about 4-5 hours on the series gell cells. Otherwise, it's not that difficult to saw a hole in the battery compartment and put a larger gell cell in there. Please check SW8 power and let us know if you think 12V may be allright. bball |
In article ,
"craigm" wrote: "starman" wrote in message ... Someone said the '800' has writing on the rear of the case that indicates it can handle up to 15-V input. I have a JPG copy of the '800' schematic so I'll check it out too. My Sat 800 says 9V on the back. The manual says 9V also. When you look at the schematic you will find the input DC is routed several places and not all of them lead to a regulator. My position would be to only use a 9 volt supply. Why risk damaging the radio by providing more than it can use? Linear switching regulators are lossy and will dissipate more heat the higher the input voltage relative to the output voltage. It might get to hot and fail after a while. You only need to be slightly higher than the minimum drop across the regulator plus the output voltage. There is no advantage being any higher. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com