"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "Stinger"

Hitler and the Nazis deserve their own special place in hell, and
resemble
neither of the popular political parties in the USA. However, you can
draw
some interesting parallels between the philosophies of liberal Democrats
and
the Politburo of the former USSR

Both comparisons are stupid beyond words. Partisan political crap.


As I stated in my post, I agree with you on the first point. However, it's
not a stretch at all to see that the liberal elites would be right at home
in the Politburo. It's basically their end-game.

-- Stinger

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "Stinger"

Good grief, MWB. You actually let them goad you into posting something
that
is stupid beyond words.



Really. Sorry, but there actually were many republicans supporting Hitler
during the 1930's. I think the original statement that Stalin would be a
Democratic nominee is also stupid beyong words.

I wasn't the one starting the stupid analogies, Stinger. How come you
always
see it one direction?


I didn't. Please note that I also criticized RHF's post that was the mirror
image of yours.

However, I did note an analogy between the Politburo and liberal elites.

No doubt, I'm sure I do tend to see it one direction, though -- guilty as
charged, Mike.

I think it's just human nature. When I see something presented in an
outrageous manner that I really disagree with, it really gets my attention.
But when I see something in a similar vein that has at least some reasonable
content that I agree with along with some hyperbole, I usually just wish
that the poster had toned it down a bit. I guess that's just the nature of
UseNet.

Have a good evening,

-- Stinger

From: "Stinger"

As I stated in my post, I agree with you on the first point. However, it's
not a stretch at all to see that the liberal elites would be right at home
in the Politburo. It's basically their end-game.



Bull****. In reality, the Democrats are no closer to the Politburo than the
Republicans are to the SS.

Your inference that Democrats open the door to communism is simply offensive.
You won't sway many voters with that kind of rhetoric.


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "Stinger"

As I stated in my post, I agree with you on the first point. However,
it's
not a stretch at all to see that the liberal elites would be right at
home
in the Politburo. It's basically their end-game.



Bull****. In reality, the Democrats are no closer to the Politburo than
the
Republicans are to the SS.

Your inference that Democrats open the door to communism is simply
offensive.
You won't sway many voters with that kind of rhetoric.


Not Communism, Michael -- Socialism. There's no way you can say that people
like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are not socialists -- look at their
voting records, and (more importantly) their agendas. At least be honest
about who they are.

-- Stinger

From: "Stinger"

Not Communism, Michael -- Socialism. There's no way you can say that people
like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are not socialists -- look at their
voting records, and (more importantly) their agendas. At least be honest
about who they are.


The old mantra of the Republicans really hasn't changed since the 1950's. Real
socialists would laugh at your ridiculous assumption that Hillary is the
vanguard of creeping socialism.

Can't you see that folks like Cheney and Ashcroft have the same agenda of
social control advocated by the German fascists?
Can't you be honest about their agendas?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "Stinger"

Not Communism, Michael -- Socialism. There's no way you can say that
people
like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are not socialists -- look at their
voting records, and (more importantly) their agendas. At least be honest
about who they are.


The old mantra of the Republicans really hasn't changed since the 1950's.
Real
socialists would laugh at your ridiculous assumption that Hillary is the
vanguard of creeping socialism.

Can't you see that folks like Cheney and Ashcroft have the same agenda of
social control advocated by the German fascists?
Can't you be honest about their agendas?



They definitely would not laugh at Hillary, and your "real Socialists" would
see her, Kerry, and Teddy K. as kindred spirits.

As for any "social control" agenda, the world has changed. The difference
is that the guys we have in there now took any new "social control" (your
words - not mine) powers reluctantly, while those on the left hunger for it
and scheme to socialize our government if they get the chance.

-- Stinger

STINGER,

The Liberal 'left' always likes to cite Hitler as the EVIL ONE !

Hitler - NAZI - Fascism * Estimate 16 Million Killed

But, the Left has its own Monsters who Killed Many More in the
Name of the 'just cause' of World Communism:

Pol Pot - Communism * Estimate 4 Million Killed

Mao - Cultural Revolution - Communism * Estimate 32 Million Killed

Stalin - Communism * Estimate 40 Million Killed

* Note: Murdered Directly, Starved to Death, or Force into
Slave Labor Camps to Work and Die.

ADD a few Acient Killers like Ghengis Khan, Kublai Khan,
Atilla the Hun and Tamerlane.

Check-Out Hyper-History:
http://www.hyperhistory.com/online_n...n2/hist_6.html


Just the Facts ~ RHF
..
..
= = = "Stinger" wrote in message
= = = ...
RHF,

Hitler and the Nazis deserve their own special place in hell, and resemble
neither of the popular political parties in the USA. However, you can draw
some interesting parallels between the philosophies of liberal Democrats and
the Politburo of the former USSR.

-- Stinger

"RHF" wrote in message
m...
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ...
From: "Mark S. Holden"

Stalin has not announced that he's running for President,
this year.

Of course, being dead and all, that would be hard for
him...



He could run as a Democrat.

And Hitler could run as a Republican. It would probably be close.

MWB - Hitler was 'in-fact' a National Socialist "NAZI"

So... Today in the USofA - Hilter would be a Liberal Democrat.
* Pro-Choice = The Killing of Babys
* Anti-Israel = Anti-Jewish

Just the Facts ~ RHF
.
.

Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: "Stinger"

Not Communism, Michael -- Socialism. There's no way you can say that people
like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are not socialists -- look at their
voting records, and (more importantly) their agendas. At least be honest
about who they are.


The old mantra of the Republicans really hasn't changed since the 1950's. Real
socialists would laugh at your ridiculous assumption that Hillary is the
vanguard of creeping socialism.

Can't you see that folks like Cheney and Ashcroft have the same agenda of
social control advocated by the German fascists?
Can't you be honest about their agendas?

Why can't you be honest Fat Boy?

From: "Stinger"

As for any "social control" agenda, the world has changed. The difference
is that the guys we have in there now took any new "social control" (your
words - not mine) powers reluctantly, while those on the left hunger for it
and scheme to socialize our government if they get the chance.


So Bush and Ashcroft's constant appeals for expanded Patriot Act powers
demonstrate "reluctance" on their parts? Good luck selling that one!


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: "Stinger"

As for any "social control" agenda, the world has changed. The difference
is that the guys we have in there now took any new "social control" (your
words - not mine) powers reluctantly, while those on the left hunger for it
and scheme to socialize our government if they get the chance.


So Bush and Ashcroft's constant appeals for expanded Patriot Act powers
demonstrate "reluctance" on their parts? Good luck selling that one!

The Patriot Act should include the immediate arrest of any academic who lies
about his/her educational credentials.

Lying educators are terrorists!