From: N8KDV

I don't think he would've made it through the Revolution... he'd have been
strung up. Albeit with a very stout rope.

And if you were around then I'm sure you would've done your best to alienate
our French allies. That's probably the reason you insist on British spellings
for so many words....


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael 'I hate everyone, just ask me' Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

I don't think he would've made it through the Revolution... he'd have been
strung up. Albeit with a very stout rope.

And if you were around then I'm sure you would've done your best to alienate
our French allies.

They would have rendered you down for French Frying grease, Fat Boy.

That's probably the reason you insist on British spellings
for so many words....

Bothers you, don't it?

From: "T. Early"

Definitively is a big word and the -particulars- of what we know
occurred at Abu Ghraib have not been tied to Rumsfeld. It's a good
piece because Hersh is one of the best at mining people who have axes
to grind as his unnamed sources. Unfortunately, he writes lead
paragraphs like the one in the New Yorker story that are designed for
maximum (overly broad) impact and aren't really supported by what
follows.


Wasn't Hersch the journalist that first reported the My Lai massacre in
Vietnam?
Didn't the investigation by the military end up confirming his reporting?



Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "T. Early"

Definitively is a big word and the -particulars- of what we know
occurred at Abu Ghraib have not been tied to Rumsfeld. It's a good
piece because Hersh is one of the best at mining people who have
axes
to grind as his unnamed sources. Unfortunately, he writes lead
paragraphs like the one in the New Yorker story that are designed
for
maximum (overly broad) impact and aren't really supported by what
follows.


Wasn't Hersch the journalist that first reported the My Lai massacre
in
Vietnam?
Didn't the investigation by the military end up confirming his
reporting?

I didn't say he doesn't have the credentials, nor am I in any position
to argue with the substance of the New Yorker piece. I said I think
his lead paragraph--specifically "Rumsfeld’s decision embittered the
American intelligence community, damaged the effectiveness of élite
combat units, and hurt America’s prospects in the war on terror"--is a
broad-stroke opinion, not a fact, and is not explored in the article.

Michael 'I'm running on empty' Bryant wrote:

From: "T. Early"

Definitively is a big word and the -particulars- of what we know
occurred at Abu Ghraib have not been tied to Rumsfeld. It's a good
piece because Hersh is one of the best at mining people who have axes
to grind as his unnamed sources. Unfortunately, he writes lead
paragraphs like the one in the New Yorker story that are designed for
maximum (overly broad) impact and aren't really supported by what
follows.


Wasn't Hersch the journalist that first reported the My Lai massacre in
Vietnam?
Didn't the investigation by the military end up confirming his reporting?

Maybe he needs to investigate Kerry and confirm the war atrocities he admits
to committing.

N8KDV,

About the 'admitted' Vietnam War Criminal John 'ff' Kerry:

* "Vetting the Vet Record"
Is John 'ff' Kerry a proud war hero or Angry Anti-War Protester ?
http://www.nationalreview.com/owens/...0401270825.asp

* John 'ff' Kerry Accused U.S. of War Crimes
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=3010

* John 'ff' Kerry Committed War Crimes, 'Burned Villages' in Viet Nam
by United Press International • Saturday March 13, 2004 at 12:02 PM
http://idaho.indymedia.org/news/2004/03/7218.php
The Democratic Nominee for President is a Confessed War Criminal

* Vietnam Veterans Against John 'ff' Kerry
http://pages.xtn.net/~wingman/docs/kerryst.htm
http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm

* Cash-and-Kerry
http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/Rea...e.asp?ID=11939
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=11940

Just the Facts ~ RHF
..
..
= = = N8KDV wrote in message
= = = ...
Michael 'I'm running on empty' Bryant wrote:

From: "T. Early"

Definitively is a big word and the -particulars- of what we know
occurred at Abu Ghraib have not been tied to Rumsfeld. It's a good
piece because Hersh is one of the best at mining people who have axes
to grind as his unnamed sources. Unfortunately, he writes lead
paragraphs like the one in the New Yorker story that are designed for
maximum (overly broad) impact and aren't really supported by what
follows.


Wasn't Hersch the journalist that first reported the My Lai massacre in
Vietnam?
Didn't the investigation by the military end up confirming his reporting?

Maybe he needs to investigate Kerry and confirm the war atrocities he admits
to committing.