From: "T. Early"

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Yep, he probably needs one given how deep he's involved in the leaking of that
CIA agent's name to the press. That is against the law, right?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "T. Early"

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Yep, he probably needs one given how deep he's involved in the
leaking of that
CIA agent's name to the press. That is against the law, right?


Yes, it is against the law. And now that you've shown, contrary to
widely held belief, that you're capable of getting something right,
why don't you go for two and provide any support for your statement
that -he's- deeply involved in the leak.

BTW, refusing in the moment to speak with investigators until a lawyer
is present is commonly known as "lawyering up." Consulting with one
in anticipation of questioning isn't. Yet another attempt at an
inflammatory header that just comes off wrong.

"T. Early" wrote in message
...

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "T. Early"

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Yep, he probably needs one given how deep he's involved in the
leaking of that
CIA agent's name to the press. That is against the law, right?


Yes, it is against the law. And now that you've shown, contrary to
widely held belief, that you're capable of getting something right,
why don't you go for two and provide any support for your statement
that -he's- deeply involved in the leak.

BTW, refusing in the moment to speak with investigators until a lawyer
is present is commonly known as "lawyering up." Consulting with one
in anticipation of questioning isn't. Yet another attempt at an
inflammatory header that just comes off wrong.

Bryant never lets facts get in the way of his rants.

MWB,

"That is against the law, right ?"

MWB - Are you not inviting a rejoinder
from DX Ace by making this statement?

Something to Think About ~ RHF
..
..
= = = ocom (Michael Bryant) wrote in message
= = = ...
From: "T. Early"

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Yep, he probably needs one given how deep he's involved in the leaking of that
CIA agent's name to the press. That is against the law, right?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

In article , ocom says...

From: "T. Early"

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Yep, he probably needs one given how deep he's involved in the leaking of that
CIA agent's name to the press. That is against the law, right?

It will be interesting to see if the administration is more
successful in finding out who told Chalibis that we'd cracked
Iran's codes, than they were in discovering who outed the
CIA agent's identity.

FW