Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul Sherwin wrote: On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 03:04:27 GMT, Jon Noring wrote: I'm very interested in building such a tuner to match with audiophile-grade tube amplifiers and pre-amplifiers now being built by hobbyists (as well as those sold by commercial vendors.) There are quite a few nice kits now being marketed for audiophile quality tube amps/pre-amps, such as those made by diytube (http://www.diytube.com/ -- there are many others like diytube.) So why not similar kits (or workable designs) for a tube-based AM tuner? No offence Jon, but I think you're nuts. Most hifi listeners (never mind audiophiles) wouldn't dream of using *FM* for serious listening, because of the level of optimodding and other sound processing that goes on. Quite a lot of commercial stations even adjust the playback speed of their music to make the station sound more 'lively' and to squeeze in more commercials. All the audiophiles I know do listen fervently to the FM stations we have which take pains to transmit unadulterated audio. Where I am is a city of only 300,000, and we have an Arts FM station funded by subcribers and mild advertisers, and their signal is tops. The govt owned station, ABC Classic FM broadcasts nothing but classical and some jazz. Electric guitars are rarely heard. They regularly do live broadcasts each sunday and during the week, and all are at a high technical standard. Then we have a community FM radio station run by feminists and mainly leftists, and that has the best specialist rythym and blues shows. Then there is a station for ethnic culturists. The remaining stations are pop music, christian, or sports report based, and thir programmes are all just ****e to me, and the audio is little better than the AM stations, and I am allergic to ALL their adverts, which have the opposite effect on me that the advertisers hope for, ie, I WILL NOT buy coca cola after hearing an add saying things go better with coke. AM has all that, plus very high levels of signal compression and an effective HF cutoff of about 3.5kHz. You can't improve this by extending the IF bandwidth, because the stations just don't transmit anything above this. Here in Oz, they do transmit more than 3.5 kHz of audio, so we get some stations worth listening to. There's nothing wrong with building your own high quality AM tuner, either solid state or tube, but no matter how many gold lettered Telefunken ECC83s you use it won't sound very good. There are programs where the content has little above 8 kHz. If one stretches the BW of the receiver here in Oz, its surprising how good AM radio can sound. A Telefunken ECC83 is a useless tube in any RF circuit. I get your point, but ppl in r.a.t are spread around the globe where different conditions prevail. Patrick Turner. Best regards, Paul -- Paul Sherwin Consulting http://paulsherwin.co.uk |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA/FS: High Power Antenna Tuner | Equipment | |||
FA/FS: High Power Antenna Tuner | Equipment | |||
High school radio stations alive and well | Broadcasting | |||
KE9OA's High Performance MW Receiver | Shortwave | |||
High performance MW receiver | Shortwave |