Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Dwight Stewart" wrote... Actually, I thought his comments were pretty funny, especially the part about intelligence. Of course, perhaps you have to be around the military most of your life, and have worked in military intelligence, to really get the humor of it. The "would-be torturers" part was a little over the top, but, since it did happen, that impression is something the military will have to deal with for some time. Stewart Hi Dwight. The old joke about "military intelligence" being an oxymoron is indeed funny. But I didn't feel any of the post was intended in to be humorous. Yes, the torture and harsh tactics did happen, but to categorize everyone in the military in that light is, at the least, baiting this group. Maybe I missed the joke. I've been known to do that. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
redrum wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:00:31 -0400,dxAce wrote: redrum wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:34:17 -0400,dxAce wrote: m II wrote: dxAce wrote: The Pentagon has reissued its Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, featuring 736 pages of definitions updated through March 23, 2004. The Dictionary includes a limited amount of intelligence terminology, but no military slang. Many in the US military indeed DO have a limited amount intelligence, so it would seem appropriate that the terminology used is adapted to this reality. Slang would just befuddle these would-be torturers. It was best left out. Don't look now... but you forgot to put the word 'of' in your first sentence. Don't look now but you are too stupid for words. Then how did you manage to string a few of them together, 'tard? As you've proven with your answer, you can hardly form a sentence yourself. But I did, didn't I, 'tard? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Sanjaya" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote... Actually, I thought his comments were pretty funny, especially the part about intelligence. Of course, perhaps you have to be around the military most of your life, and have worked in military intelligence, to really get the humor of it. The "would-be torturers" part was a little over the top, but, since it did happen, that impression is something the military will have to deal with for some time. Hi Dwight. The old joke about "military intelligence" being an oxymoron is indeed funny. But I didn't feel any of the post was intended in to be humorous. Yes, the torture and harsh tactics did happen, but to categorize everyone in the military in that light is, at the least, baiting this group. Maybe I missed the joke. I've been known to do that. Perhaps I give people more credit. Darn few, if any, are going to be influenced by such a blanket statement, so I don't really see his comment as something to get that excited about. Having said that, it is indeed an impression that every single person in the military will have to deal with until people finally forget. When seeing a soldier, some will always wonder if that particular service member was involved. That may not be fair, but it is the reality of situations like this. Since we can't change that reality, I feel the best solution is to ignore it and move on to other things (like the humor about "military intelligence"). Stewart |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 06:57:42 -0400,dxAce wrote:
redrum wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:00:31 -0400,dxAce wrote: redrum wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:34:17 -0400,dxAce wrote: m II wrote: dxAce wrote: The Pentagon has reissued its Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, featuring 736 pages of definitions updated through March 23, 2004. The Dictionary includes a limited amount of intelligence terminology, but no military slang. Many in the US military indeed DO have a limited amount intelligence, so it would seem appropriate that the terminology used is adapted to this reality. Slang would just befuddle these would-be torturers. It was best left out. Don't look now... but you forgot to put the word 'of' in your first sentence. Don't look now but you are too stupid for words. Then how did you manage to string a few of them together, 'tard? As you've proven with your answer, you can hardly form a sentence yourself. But I did, didn't I, 'tard? Just because you start your string of words with a capital and end it with a period or question mark does not mean it's a sentence, stupid. As you've proven with your answer, you can hardly form a sentence yourself. Attempting to correct someone else when your own grasp of the English language is severely limited reinforces my opinion that you are too stupid for words. I repeat, Don't look now but you are too stupid for words. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
redrum wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 06:57:42 -0400,dxAce wrote: redrum wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:00:31 -0400,dxAce wrote: redrum wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:34:17 -0400,dxAce wrote: m II wrote: dxAce wrote: The Pentagon has reissued its Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, featuring 736 pages of definitions updated through March 23, 2004. The Dictionary includes a limited amount of intelligence terminology, but no military slang. Many in the US military indeed DO have a limited amount intelligence, so it would seem appropriate that the terminology used is adapted to this reality. Slang would just befuddle these would-be torturers. It was best left out. Don't look now... but you forgot to put the word 'of' in your first sentence. Don't look now but you are too stupid for words. Then how did you manage to string a few of them together, 'tard? As you've proven with your answer, you can hardly form a sentence yourself. But I did, didn't I, 'tard? Just because you start your string of words with a capital and end it with a period or question mark does not mean it's a sentence, stupid. I guess you and I have a difference of opinion on what contitutes a sentence, 'tard! Don't look now but you are too stupid for words. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:50:22 -0400,dxAce wrote:
redrum wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 06:57:42 -0400,dxAce wrote: redrum wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:00:31 -0400,dxAce wrote: redrum wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:34:17 -0400,dxAce wrote: m II wrote: dxAce wrote: The Pentagon has reissued its Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, featuring 736 pages of definitions updated through March 23, 2004. The Dictionary includes a limited amount of intelligence terminology, but no military slang. Many in the US military indeed DO have a limited amount intelligence, so it would seem appropriate that the terminology used is adapted to this reality. Slang would just befuddle these would-be torturers. It was best left out. Don't look now... but you forgot to put the word 'of' in your first sentence. Don't look now but you are too stupid for words. Then how did you manage to string a few of them together, 'tard? As you've proven with your answer, you can hardly form a sentence yourself. But I did, didn't I, 'tard? Just because you start your string of words with a capital and end it with a period or question mark does not mean it's a sentence, stupid. I guess you and I have a difference of opinion on what contitutes a sentence, 'tard! There is no "opinion" on what constitutes a sentence, stupid. There are rules that spell out how a sentence is formed not opinions, stupid. As you've proven with your answer, you can hardly form a sentence yourself. Attempting to correct someone else when your own grasp of the English language is severely limited reinforces my opinion that you are too stupid for words. I repeat, Don't look now but you are too stupid for words. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
redrum wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:50:22 -0400,dxAce wrote: redrum wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 06:57:42 -0400,dxAce wrote: redrum wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:00:31 -0400,dxAce wrote: redrum wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:34:17 -0400,dxAce wrote: m II wrote: dxAce wrote: The Pentagon has reissued its Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, featuring 736 pages of definitions updated through March 23, 2004. The Dictionary includes a limited amount of intelligence terminology, but no military slang. Many in the US military indeed DO have a limited amount intelligence, so it would seem appropriate that the terminology used is adapted to this reality. Slang would just befuddle these would-be torturers. It was best left out. Don't look now... but you forgot to put the word 'of' in your first sentence. Don't look now but you are too stupid for words. Then how did you manage to string a few of them together, 'tard? As you've proven with your answer, you can hardly form a sentence yourself. But I did, didn't I, 'tard? Just because you start your string of words with a capital and end it with a period or question mark does not mean it's a sentence, stupid. I guess you and I have a difference of opinion on what contitutes a sentence, 'tard! There is no "opinion" on what constitutes a sentence, stupid. There must be, 'tard. Because you disagree with what my 'opinion' is. There are rules that spell out how a sentence is formed not opinions, stupid. OK, 'tard, tell me what rules I may have broken. As you've proven with your answer, you can hardly form a sentence yourself. Perhaps, but form them I do, 'tard. Attempting to correct someone else when your own grasp of the English language is severely limited reinforces my opinion that you are too stupid for words. I repeat, Don't look now but you are too stupid for words. You're pretty repetitive. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 12:03:40 -0400, dxAce wrote:
You're pretty repetitive. Maybe he's a liar and fabricator. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 12:03:40 -0400,dxAce wrote:
redrum wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:50:22 -0400,dxAce wrote: redrum wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 06:57:42 -0400,dxAce wrote: redrum wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:00:31 -0400,dxAce wrote: redrum wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:34:17 -0400,dxAce wrote: m II wrote: dxAce wrote: The Pentagon has reissued its Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, featuring 736 pages of definitions updated through March 23, 2004. The Dictionary includes a limited amount of intelligence terminology, but no military slang. Many in the US military indeed DO have a limited amount intelligence, so it would seem appropriate that the terminology used is adapted to this reality. Slang would just befuddle these would-be torturers. It was best left out. Don't look now... but you forgot to put the word 'of' in your first sentence. Don't look now but you are too stupid for words. Then how did you manage to string a few of them together, 'tard? As you've proven with your answer, you can hardly form a sentence yourself. But I did, didn't I, 'tard? Just because you start your string of words with a capital and end it with a period or question mark does not mean it's a sentence, stupid. I guess you and I have a difference of opinion on what contitutes a sentence, 'tard! There is no "opinion" on what constitutes a sentence, stupid. There must be, 'tard. Because you disagree with what my 'opinion' is. Where did I disagree with your opinion of what a sentence is, stupid? You had no opinion of what a sentence is, stupid. I told you what a sentence isn't, stupid. That's when you said we have a difference of opinion, stupid. Try to at least keep track of your stupidity, stupid. There are rules that spell out how a sentence is formed not opinions, stupid. OK, 'tard, tell me what rules I may have broken. If you have to ask then you don't have a clue about sentence structure, stupid. As you've proven with your answer, you can hardly form a sentence yourself. Perhaps, but form them I do, 'tard. Keep writing, you ooze ignorance of the English language and are too stupid to realize it, stupid. Attempting to correct someone else when your own grasp of the English language is severely limited reinforces my opinion that you are too stupid for words. I repeat, Don't look now but you are too stupid for words. You're pretty repetitive. That's because I'm trying to impress upon you how stupid you are, stupid. Attempting to correct someone else when your own grasp of the English language is severely limited reinforces my opinion that you are too stupid for words. I repeat, Don't look now but you are too stupid for words. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who are the FISTS members on RRAP? | Policy | |||
Military Monitoring Group Growing! | Scanner | |||
War Criminal Bush suspends Military Aid to Countries that Support World Court | General |