LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 04, 06:28 AM
Dwight Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Sanjaya" wrote:

"m II" wrote:
Many in the US military indeed DO have
'a limited amount intelligence', so it would
seem appropriate that the terminology used
is adapted to this reality. Slang would just
befuddle these would-be torturers. It was
best left out.


"m II" wrote, in my opinion, prejudicial
generalizations, intended, again in my
opinion, to antagonize members of this
group. Since that qualifies him as a troll
I have hereby exercise my PLONK
privileges. (snip)



Actually, I thought his comments were pretty funny, especially the part
about intelligence. Of course, perhaps you have to be around the military
most of your life, and have worked in military intelligence, to really get
the humor of it. The "would-be torturers" part was a little over the top,
but, since it did happen, that impression is something the military will
have to deal with for some time.

Stewart

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who are the FISTS members on RRAP? William Policy 378 December 7th 04 11:25 AM
Military Monitoring Group Growing! GeorgeF Scanner 1 June 5th 04 03:01 AM
War Criminal Bush suspends Military Aid to Countries that Support World Court GM General 0 July 2nd 03 11:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017