Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dwight Stewart wrote:
Perhaps I'm just a little oversensitive to the idea because of all the computer hardware and software that has become obsolete over the years - millions and millions of tons of still working but obsolete computers, printers, and peripherals, dumped into landfills throughout the country. Stewart Computer hardware recycling is becoming a lucrative business. You'd be surprised at how much gold they can get out of one. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/7/prweb142436.htm -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I would tend to disagree about the RX320 not being a DX machine.
I've gotten my fair share of good stuff on this radio; over the last couple of nights, for example, AIR Bangalore's regional service on 10330 has been doing quite well here in Maryland. I've often caught smaller LA stations using the 320. Almost anything my venerable R7A can hear, my RX320 can, too. The only limiting factor is, of course, hash from the monitor and/or computer. And to add to the data here, I'm using homebrewed antennas in my attic. It's a matter of skill, too. Regarding software; we've got a nice collection of links with all sorts of controller programs, mods, reviews - and there's even a link with a *huge* assortment of digital decoding software for those that like to get into that sort of thing. All that can be found on the RX320's Yahoo group at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RX320/ 73s Mike Gavin Jacobs wrote: In article , says... Hi all, Having done some DX'ing with a small Sony SW radio for ten years, I would like to buy a better one, connected to the pc. I was thinking of the Ten-Tech RX320D. Does anyone have any experience with this radio? Is it better than, say, Icom or Winradio? And what about computer noise? Also, I'm in an apartment and would like some kind of antenna (active?). Which one would you recommend, and where to get it. I am not really a DIY person Thanks! I have the RX320D and use it quite a bit. It is not a DX machine by any stretch, but it will handle a lot of spelunking nicely. The connection from the radio to the computer is a serial cable (and in my case an audio cable to play the audio through the computer, which in turn goes to the stereo amp). Using the supplied whip, you do pick up noise from the computer, but not because of the serial cable nor the audio cable. With a standalone radio, you could just shut the computer off; but the noise is hardly noticeable, and any other antenna (indoor or outdoor) will negate any issue. I agree with comment about not getting an internal card radio. Too much noise inside the best of the computer boxes. Also, they are much more expensive. At some point your new computer will come without a serial port; then you will need to buy either a USB to serial converter, or a serial card. Both these will be low risk and low cost compared to trying to make a card-radio work. Regarding software for the 320d: I paid extra for the radio/software package from a third party, but that turned out to be the wrong decision. Just buy the box from tentec, throw out the software that they supply, and use the freeware from: http://www.ilgradio.com/gnpdb/ While you are there, get the GNDB front-end and the ILG database; and the two programs work together very nicely. Also, you can get a freeware program that will decode DRM signals. I messed around with it and on the few occasions that the signal (from Sackville on the the east coast of Canada) was strong enough, the digital signal really delivered high quality. Also, you can get freeware DSP programs. So if you are feeding the audio through the sound card (as I am), you can shape the audio however you like (for example, I was once getting a lot of noise above 3khz on BBC, so I just put a low pass filter on it and was able to hear a signal that was otherwise unintelligible). I will admit that I am a computer nut, so this radio makes perfect sense for me; but it isn't for everyone. It isn't a portable rig by any stretch of the imagination (when I am on the road, I just use DXTUNERS). Hope that helps, Gavin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Gavin Jacobs wrote:
In article , says... Hi all, Having done some DX'ing with a small Sony SW radio for ten years, I would like to buy a better one, connected to the pc. I was thinking of the Ten-Tech RX320D. Does anyone have any experience with this radio? Is it better than, say, Icom or Winradio? And what about computer noise? Also, I'm in an apartment and would like some kind of antenna (active?). Which one would you recommend, and where to get it. I am not really a DIY person Thanks! [...] I agree with comment about not getting an internal card radio. Too much noise inside the best of the computer boxes. Also, they are much more expensive. At some point your new computer will come without a serial port; then you will need to buy either a USB to serial converter, or a serial card. Both these will be low risk and low cost compared to trying to make a card-radio work. While I agree with the caveats above, it depends on your goals. The WinRadio G303i is an SDR, which allows you to do a lot of interesting hacks, should you want to. The API is published. Eventually I hope the register set for the card is published, so an open-source Linux driver for it can be developed. As for its performance as an HF receiver... It's astounding. NO noise leakage from the PC at all, and it has features many other receivers don't. I've thoroughly enjoyed mine. If you get one, be sure to get the "Professional Demodulator" version -- the extra $100 for that software is worth it, just for the continuous bandwidth adjustments. Now, if you aren't interested in a PCI-based receiver, which, granted *will* have a limited lifetime, the RX-320 is well regarded. I don't have that one so I can't speak for it, pro or con. You might want to pick up a copy of "Passport to World Band Radio" to see the reviews of the two receivers. Regards, Eric -- Eric F. Richards, "Making me root for a sanctimonious statist blowhard like Kerry isn't the worst thing Bush has done to the country. But it's the offense that I take most personally." -- http://www.reason.com/links/links071304.shtml |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:59:26 +0200, Bill
wrote: Having done some DX'ing with a small Sony SW radio for ten years, I would like to buy a better one, connected to the pc. I was thinking of the Ten-Tech RX320D. Does anyone have any experience with this radio? Is it better than, say, Icom or Winradio? And what about computer noise? Also, I'm in an apartment and would like some kind of antenna (active?). Which one would you recommend, and where to get it. I am not really a DIY person Thanks for the replies, all! Anyone have anything to say about the Winradio G303? It seems even better than the RX320D and the Icom. Though more expensive and internal (but well-shielded, I heard). |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bill wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:59:26 +0200, Bill wrote: Having done some DX'ing with a small Sony SW radio for ten years, I would like to buy a better one, connected to the pc. I was thinking of the Ten-Tech RX320D. Does anyone have any experience with this radio? Is it better than, say, Icom or Winradio? And what about computer noise? Also, I'm in an apartment and would like some kind of antenna (active?). Which one would you recommend, and where to get it. I am not really a DIY person Thanks for the replies, all! Anyone have anything to say about the Winradio G303? It seems even better than the RX320D and the Icom. Though more expensive and internal (but well-shielded, I heard). Yeah, up there earlier. :-) It's a terrific radio for the money. Actually, it's a terrific radio, period. It is extremely well shielded -- I get NO noise at all. If you get one, get the Professional demodulator -- it's worth the extra $100 just to get continuous variable bandwidth. The spectrum scope is actually useful, unlike most built-in spectrum scopes. The filtering, since it is implemented in software and therefore doesn't have all the inevitable interactions that actual hardware has, is great. (Yes, sloppy filtering can be done in software, but that's not the case here.) There are, of course, disadvantages to using a radio that used both your sound card input and a free PCI slot, plus is unable to be moved around freely like a standalone radio, but if those issues aren't a big deal for you, go for it. Eric -- Eric F. Richards, "Making me root for a sanctimonious statist blowhard like Kerry isn't the worst thing Bush has done to the country. But it's the offense that I take most personally." -- http://www.reason.com/links/links071304.shtml |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Comparing Four Great Communications Receivers | Shortwave | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew | |||
Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew |