Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() ----- Original Message ----- From: "m II" Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 7:16 PM Subject: Gene Scott, satellites and MW Honus wrote: I'm going to enjoy this damned hobby if it kills me. Hear, Hear! There should be a Latin translation of that somewhere... And here it is, courtesy of the boys over at alt.language.latin: "I'm going to enjoy this hobby if it kills me." Hoc studio fructurus sum etsi eo interfiam. Or Mihi stat etiam ad mortem hoc studium persequi. Literally; "I am determined to pursue this hobby even unto death." I was hoping to end up with a new sig file, but they don't have quite the ring that I was looking for. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Honus wrote:
I was hoping to end up with a new sig file, but they don't have quite the ring that I was looking for. There's always "semper ubi sub ubi". -- It's unfair to characterize Kerry as a flip-flopper. He's consistently in favor of marrying a rich widow and buying your way into the White House. -- Rex Tincher |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:50:48 GMT, "Honus"
wrote: And for rec.radio.shortwave, does anybody know of a URL that explains the process by which SW trasmissions are rebroadcast via satellite? Obviously, I've got more to learn about this. ![]() I'm still looking for this one. Nobody is broadcasting shortwave frequencies from satellites. (There are a few ham satellites with repeater outputs on the 10-meter band, if they haven't died by now.) Gene has a conventional TV channel on satellite, but in addition he and others are using the new technology which is taking the place of shortwave in affluent countries, MPEG broadcasting. Basically this is using the same multiplexing and modulation scheme as DBS but with no encryption, on the medium-power Ku-band satellites rather than the high-power DBS satellites. Just like DBS, you can pack a few video channels and a lot of audio channels onto one transponder. In the United States, you'll find two main types of things broadcast this way: foreign-language programming (Asian channels are particularly popular) and Protestant evangelism. For further information, consult alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Honus" wrote in message ... [snip] The first part of that went clean over my head. Thanks for trying, though! g Not a problem. You don't need to run the numbers on a superhet, anymore than any driver needs to know how an automatic transmission shifts gears. But, if you get an anomolous signal on your S-350, just figure it's your radio hearing a signal that's really somewhere else. I don't know the S-350, but I'll assume it's a decent radio for program listening. You won't be happy with it if you expect it to have all it's images and spurious responses silenced. That costs more money. No, I wasn't that lucky. It's good to have something to look forward to, though. If Dr. Scott is boring, feel free to tune out. His boring shows rarely get better. Dr. Scott can be very good, but he ain't no Brother Stair. Frank Dresser |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message ... [snip] The first part of that went clean over my head. Thanks for trying, though! g Not a problem. You don't need to run the numbers on a superhet, anymore than any driver needs to know how an automatic transmission shifts gears. But, if you get an anomolous signal on your S-350, just figure it's your radio hearing a signal that's really somewhere else. I don't know the S-350, but I'll assume it's a decent radio for program listening. You won't be happy with it if you expect it to have all it's images and spurious responses silenced. That costs more money. Now you tell me. gbg I just wish that when I'd done all of my research before I bought it, that someone in those many reviews had mentioned spurious signals, etc. I wouldn't have known what they meant, but I'd have investigated it...and probably gone with a different unit. No, I wasn't that lucky. It's good to have something to look forward to, though. If Dr. Scott is boring, feel free to tune out. His boring shows rarely get better. Dr. Scott can be very good, but he ain't no Brother Stair. He went off the air before I could hear any ID, or any real ranting or tirading. I figured out who he was by other means, i.e. the guy speaking said it was his 75th brthday, etc. I read up on Scott a little, and I really am looking forward to hearing some of the outrageous stuff that comes from him. But I'm not going to listen to a boring sermon to get to it! I just wanted to log that weird 1615 signal. Oh well. Thanks again. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Honus" wrote in message . ..
I posted this message over in rec.radio.amateur.dx, but no one seems to have any answers for me. It's perhaps a little off-topic, but since most of the posts in these parts are, it'll fit right in. And at least here I'll get some sort of response. Even if it's political. I'm just going to cut and paste: I'm new to the hobby, so please bear with me. I picked up a Gene Scott broadcast last night on MW at 1615 KHz. Here's the Anguilla, British West Indies 24 hours a day - 7 days a week 690 KHz AM 1610 KHz .........snip..................................... ......................... The DX 350 is a sensitive receiver but it doesn't work too well with a long antenna. The circuits overload and you find images of stations in all sorts of places where they shouldn't be. The first thing to do is to disconnect the long wire antenna and see what kind of reception you get off the whip. Probably the "ghosts" will disappear. Another thing you can do is to find the switch on the right hand side of the radio marked ""SW LPF" and switch it on. This will help remove some of the mysterious signals. If the problem persists disconnect the ground and see if that helps. You may find that you can receive most of the stations you want right off the whip. Also, the "RF Gain" contol should be turned counter-clockwise to the point where the stations just start to drop off. If you wnt to get some of the weaker stations, you will have to experiment and see how much antenna you can use before the overloading starts. You can wind a few turns around the whip or use the antenna input at the back. I think 10 or 20 feet of wire would be plenty. When matched to the right length of antenna, the DX 350 should be fine for your purpose. If you get a bit frustrated at having to fiddle with the antenna, ride the RF gain, and switch the LPF on and off, remember that communications receivers that handle a wide range of signal strengths cost upwards of $1,000.......good listening.....ken.... |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "ken" wrote in message m... "Honus" wrote in message . .. I posted this message over in rec.radio.amateur.dx, but no one seems to have any answers for me. It's perhaps a little off-topic, but since most of the posts in these parts are, it'll fit right in. And at least here I'll get some sort of response. Even if it's political. I'm just going to cut and paste: I'm new to the hobby, so please bear with me. I picked up a Gene Scott broadcast last night on MW at 1615 KHz. Here's the Anguilla, British West Indies 24 hours a day - 7 days a week 690 KHz AM 1610 KHz ........snip...................................... ........................ The DX 350 is a sensitive receiver but it doesn't work too well with a long antenna. The circuits overload and you find images of stations in all sorts of places where they shouldn't be. The first thing to do is to disconnect the long wire antenna and see what kind of reception you get off the whip. Probably the "ghosts" will disappear. Another thing you can do is to find the switch on the right hand side of the radio marked ""SW LPF" and switch it on. This will help remove some of the mysterious signals. If the problem persists disconnect the ground and see if that helps. You may find that you can receive most of the stations you want right off the whip. Also, the "RF Gain" contol should be turned counter-clockwise to the point where the stations just start to drop off. If you wnt to get some of the weaker stations, you will have to experiment and see how much antenna you can use before the overloading starts. You can wind a few turns around the whip or use the antenna input at the back. I think 10 or 20 feet of wire would be plenty. When matched to the right length of antenna, the DX 350 should be fine for your purpose. If you get a bit frustrated at having to fiddle with the antenna, ride the RF gain, and switch the LPF on and off, remember that communications receivers that handle a wide range of signal strengths cost upwards of $1,000.......good listening.....ken.... Thanks for the tips, Ken. I'm going to give them all a try ASAP. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gene Scott, satellites and MW | Dx | |||
Gene Scott, satellites and MW | Dx | |||
Satellites and amateur radio | General |