![]() |
Send it again, Art!
Arthur Harris wrote: "dxAce" wrote: Harris wrote: That's what SOME of the swift boat people are saying. And they have little or no evidence to back up those claims. Better check those facts, Art. Well clearly, only SOME of the "swift boat people" are criticizing Kerry, so you must be questioning the part about "little or no evidence." What hard evidence do you have to support the swift boat people criticizing Kerry? And why did Bush himself today say that "I think Senator Kerry served admirably and he ought to be proud of his record." Art H. |
"dxAce" wrote:
Arthur Harris wrote: why did Bush himself today say that "I think Senator Kerry served admirably and he ought to be proud of his record." Because George W. Bush is not a stupid politician, that's why. So either: 1) Bush sincerely believes Kerry served admirably, or 2) Bush is a liar. Which is it? Art H. |
Arthur Harris wrote: "dxAce" wrote: Arthur Harris wrote: why did Bush himself today say that "I think Senator Kerry served admirably and he ought to be proud of his record." Because George W. Bush is not a stupid politician, that's why. So either: 1) Bush sincerely believes Kerry served admirably, or 2) Bush is a liar. Which is it? LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries... so either... 1. Kerry doesn't think Edwards is very good, or 2. Kerry is a liar. You're not very bright, are you? dxAce |
dxAce wrote:
Arthur Harris wrote: So either: 1) Bush sincerely believes Kerry served admirably, or 2) Bush is a liar. Which is it? LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries... They were competing for the nomination, and had some differences on some issues. There were no character attacks. Art H. |
Harris wrote: dxAce wrote: Arthur Harris wrote: So either: 1) Bush sincerely believes Kerry served admirably, or 2) Bush is a liar. Which is it? LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries... They were competing for the nomination, and had some differences on some issues. There were no character attacks. I guess that depends upon what one would consider a 'character' attack. Or what the definition of 'is' is. You Liberal's really crack me up! dxAce |
dxAce wrote:
Harris wrote: LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries... They were competing for the nomination, and had some differences on some issues. There were no character attacks. I guess that depends upon what one would consider a 'character' attack. Or what the definition of 'is' is. You Liberal's really crack me up! Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue. Art H. |
Harris wrote: dxAce wrote: Harris wrote: LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries... They were competing for the nomination, and had some differences on some issues. There were no character attacks. I guess that depends upon what one would consider a 'character' attack. Or what the definition of 'is' is. You Liberal's really crack me up! Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue. Come on Artie, play along with me.. Did you not state: "No, Bush seems to have an aversion to war when it involves him being in harms way". Did I not ask: "What wars you been in Artie? You ever volunteer for any? You ever serve in the Armed Forces?". Do you yourself have an aversion to war if it might involve you in harms way? On the other point, I guess you must have been sleeping during the primaries. You certainly missed the character attacks by Kerry against Edwards and Edwards against Kerry. I'm not surprised that you missed it. One other thing, Artie, you ever consider changing your callsign? I understand that those are your initials and all, but don't you feel just a wee bit uncomfortable when you have say November 2 Ass Hole? dxAce |
dxAce wrote:
Harris wrote: Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue. I guess you must have been sleeping during the primaries. You certainly missed the character attacks by Kerry against Edwards and Edwards against Kerry. OK, refresh my memory. Cite one or two of those character attacks. Art H. |
Harris wrote: dxAce wrote: Harris wrote: Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue. I guess you must have been sleeping during the primaries. You certainly missed the character attacks by Kerry against Edwards and Edwards against Kerry. OK, refresh my memory. Cite one or two of those character attacks. Whoa.. you can't go look it up yourself? It's out there Artie... go look it up. I realise you damn Lib's are pretty lazy, always wanting someone else to do the work when you're in a hard spot, right? dxAce Art H. |
"Telamon" wrote: Harris wrote: Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue. OK, refresh my memory. Cite one or two of those character attacks. I seem to recall Kerry calling himself the most liberal Senator and that Edwards was only #4. Pretty nasty if you ask me. Nice try. At least you came up with something semi humorous. But your pal Lare, who made the charge that Kerry and Edwards had traded numerous character attacks, couldn't produce a single example to back up his claim. I guess you can't either. Have a nice day. Art H. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com