LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Old August 22nd 04, 02:58 PM
Volker Tonn
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Ron Hardin schrieb:

It takes only half the energy for the carrier, so has half the
waste of regular AM, since the carrier carries no information.


There is NO carrier on sideband transmission. So there are some options.
They hold on the center frequency and use one or both sidebands.
In first case there is only a quarter of power needed for to reach at
least the same distance. In the second case there is half the power
needed and there is an theoretical option for stereo transmission on ISB
(independent side band). But receivers capable of ISB are very rare and
mostly found in the league of professional grade Siemens or Harris
receivers.....
Or they can shift the transmitter center frequency up or down by 2.5khz
and then tranmit with true 5khz bandwidth on a single side band which
can be a big advantage in sound compared to other sw stations.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brother Stair Leaves WBCQ Mike Terry Shortwave 7 June 30th 04 09:30 PM
WBCQ wants donations Soames123 Shortwave 4 April 19th 04 07:36 PM
$10 for WBCQ Windpower project Soames123 Shortwave 0 April 17th 04 02:11 PM
WBCQ vs Hal Turner George Orwell Shortwave 0 March 30th 04 05:42 AM
Does WBCQ have good airtime available? Soames123 Shortwave 0 July 8th 03 12:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017