"dxAce" wrote:
Arthur Harris wrote:
So if there were massive amounts of WMD (as Bush said in his 2003 State
of
the Union address), how come we found nothing?

You really need to get up to speed, Art.

You been away for a while? And if so, where were you and why?

OK, bring me up to speed. How much WMD did we find after the invasion?

Art H.

In article , dxAce
wrote:

Arthur Harris wrote:

"dxAce" wrote:
Harris wrote:
Stop right there.

Snip

OK.


You need to do a whole lot more research, Art.

What arrogance! Who the hell are you to claim I need to do more research?

I am dxAce. And you really need to put the pieces together in a better fashion
than you have to date.

Your arguments are not very convincing, at least to me.

He should move to Massachusetts. Might have better luck.

This guy Arthur Harris is quite the arrogant one.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
"Arthur Harris" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote:

Arthur Harris wrote: So if there were massive amounts of WMD (as
Bush said in his 2003 State of the Union address), how come we
found nothing?

You really need to get up to speed, Art.

You been away for a while? And if so, where were you and why?

OK, bring me up to speed. How much WMD did we find after the
invasion?

Gee I don't know.

How many WMD did Kerry and Clinton say we would find?

How many did Russia, France and Germany say we would find?

How many did the UN say we would find?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"Telamon" wrote:
"Arthur Harris" wrote:
OK, bring me up to speed. How much WMD did we find after the
invasion?

Gee I don't know.

How many WMD did Kerry and Clinton say we would find?

How many did Russia, France and Germany say we would find?

How many did the UN say we would find?

The difference is that none of the above sent our soldiers to die in battle
over WMD that no one could find.

But, back to the original statement by DX Ace. He says I've been away too
long, and I need to get up to speed on this. So please elaborate. What WMD
finds have I missed since the invasion started?

Art H.

Arthur Harris wrote:

"Telamon" wrote:
"Arthur Harris" wrote:
OK, bring me up to speed. How much WMD did we find after the
invasion?

Gee I don't know.

How many WMD did Kerry and Clinton say we would find?

How many did Russia, France and Germany say we would find?

How many did the UN say we would find?

The difference is that none of the above sent our soldiers to die in battle
over WMD that no one could find.

But, back to the original statement by DX Ace. He says I've been away too
long, and I need to get up to speed on this. So please elaborate. What WMD
finds have I missed since the invasion started?

You also need to get your meds adjusted.

Perhaps you might like to take a bit of a break, get that taken care of, then
wander back here when you might actually begin to think properly.

Get a clue Harris!

dxAce

dxAce wrote:

Arthur Harris wrote:

"Telamon" wrote:
"Arthur Harris" wrote:
OK, bring me up to speed. How much WMD did we find after the
invasion?

Gee I don't know.

How many WMD did Kerry and Clinton say we would find?

How many did Russia, France and Germany say we would find?

How many did the UN say we would find?

The difference is that none of the above sent our soldiers to die in battle
over WMD that no one could find.

But, back to the original statement by DX Ace. He says I've been away too
long, and I need to get up to speed on this. So please elaborate. What WMD
finds have I missed since the invasion started?

You also need to get your meds adjusted.

Perhaps you might like to take a bit of a break, get that taken care of, then
wander back here when you might actually begin to think properly.

Get a clue Harris!

dxAce

It's clear that you can't or don't want to address his questions, so you
resort to your usual ad hominem attacks.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Arthur Harris wrote:
"Telamon" wrote:
How many WMD did Kerry and Clinton say we would find?

How many did Russia, France and Germany say we would find?

How many did the UN say we would find?

The difference is that none of the above sent our soldiers to die in battle
over WMD that no one could find.

None of them would send soldiers if the USA were invaded. They'd give
speeches, negotiate, call on the UN to censor the invaders, but they
wouldn't lift a finger to stop the invasion, not even when the polls
came out 99.9% against them.

--
If Kerry can't cope with the "Republican Attack Machine",
how can he hope to deal with Al Qaeda?

dxAce wrote:

Arthur Harris wrote:

But, back to the original statement by DX Ace. He says I've been away too
long, and I need to get up to speed on this. So please elaborate. What WMD
finds have I missed since the invasion started?

You also need to get your meds adjusted.

Perhaps you might like to take a bit of a break, get that taken care of, then
wander back here when you might actually begin to think properly.

Get a clue Harris!

I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out
argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you
need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to
the issues I've raised.

Let's hear some specifics. What WMD finds have I missed? Why did President
Bush say that Kerry "served admirably, and he ought to be proud of his
record" if Kerry's war record is a fraud (as you claim)?

Art H.

Harris wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Arthur Harris wrote:

But, back to the original statement by DX Ace. He says I've been away too
long, and I need to get up to speed on this. So please elaborate. What WMD
finds have I missed since the invasion started?

You also need to get your meds adjusted.

Perhaps you might like to take a bit of a break, get that taken care of, then
wander back here when you might actually begin to think properly.

Get a clue Harris!

I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out
argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you
need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to
the issues I've raised.

Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well
thought out, and they require only a passing comment?

Something for you to think about.

We've all been down your old, tired arguements about WMD's. When a Liberal 'tard is
in trouble, what does he reach for? Yes, that old stuff about WMD's.

dxAce

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:

I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out
argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you
need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to
the issues I've raised.

Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well
thought out, and they require only a passing comment?

At least I'm arguing issues, and not just making personal insults. If my
arguments are so weak, why can't you rebut them with logic instead of
name calling?

We've all been down your old, tired arguements about WMD's. When a Liberal 'tard is
in trouble, what does he reach for? Yes, that old stuff about WMD's.

WMD is not just some tangential issue; it's the primary reason we got
ourselves into this mess.

Art H.