Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
mbacklund wrote:
It is probably illegal to repeat ham conversations, but I very seriously doubt there is any similar rule regarding SW broadcasting. I *believe* ham radio traffic is exempt from the rules about disclosing what you hear; I'm *sure* anything intended for broadcast is exempt. You get into a gray area when a ham runs a phone patch for someone. That might be under the ham rules, and might be considered private because of the telephone-network portion of the total communication loop. I take the coward's way out WRT that and don't disclose any phone patch traffic I hear. Too bad, because one I did myself many years ago had some really heart-rending content. -- John Kerry walks into a bar. The bartender says, "Why the long face?" |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1400 Â June 11, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave |