![]() |
Dwight Stewart wrote: "Telamon" wrote: "Dwight Stewart" wrote: (snip) As such, the only thing Kerry has done wrong, in my opinion, is not telling all those asking for this information to go to hell. Well he is asking for my vote so Kerry can go to hell as far as I'm concerned. Well, that is hardly a surprise. Based on your prior messages in this newsgroup, you wouldn't vote for Kerry even if God came down tonight and told you to do so. Therefore, Kerry wouldn't get your vote if he released more information, no matter what that information might say. The same is probably true for most others in this newsgroup ranting about info not being released. God would NEVER tell anyone to vote for Kerry. God is smarter than that. dxAce |
"dxAce" wrote:
But wouldn't stepping forward and providing the info be a coup for him. (snip) Nope. The information released so far has either been picked apart for anything, no matter how vague, to support conspiracy theories or entirely ignored when nothing to support a conspiracy theory could be found. Therefore, the release of any more information, assuming it exists (and I'm not sure it does), is a complete waste of time and even downright counter-productive. Stewart |
In article . net,
"Dwight Stewart" wrote: "Telamon" wrote: "Dwight Stewart" wrote: (snip) As such, the only thing Kerry has done wrong, in my opinion, is not telling all those asking for this information to go to hell. Well he is asking for my vote so Kerry can go to hell as far as I'm concerned. Well, that is hardly a surprise. Based on your prior messages in this newsgroup, you wouldn't vote for Kerry even if God came down tonight and told you to do so. Therefore, Kerry wouldn't get your vote if he released more information, no matter what that information might say. The same is probably true for most others in this newsgroup ranting about info not being released. Nice evasion tactic. If Kerry's Senate record sucks regardless so it would not matter to anyone of conscience. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
In article et,
"Dwight Stewart" wrote: "Mark S. Holden" wrote: You'd think if his attendance at the closed meetings was good, he'd be anxious to take away the argument. (snip) No, I think he is just darn tired of being asked to provide information which nobody else involved in all this is providing. You wrote that sentence wrong. Let me fix it for you. "No, I think he is just darn tired of being asked to provide information where everyone else involved in this has already provided it." -- Telamon Ventura, California |
In article . net,
"Dwight Stewart" wrote: "dxAce" wrote: But wouldn't stepping forward and providing the info be a coup for him. (snip) Nope. The information released so far has either been picked apart for anything, no matter how vague, to support conspiracy theories or entirely ignored when nothing to support a conspiracy theory could be found. Therefore, the release of any more information, assuming it exists (and I'm not sure it does), is a complete waste of time and even downright counter-productive. That right Dwight, Kerry is the disparager and not the subject of anyones scrutiny. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Dwight Stewart wrote:
"Mark S. Holden" wrote: You'd think if his attendance at the closed meetings was good, he'd be anxious to take away the argument. (snip) No, I think he is just darn tired of being asked to provide information which nobody else involved in all this is providing. Stewart I think if he had a good answer, he'd be giving it. If you're applying for a job, you don't duck a question unless the answer will hurt you. |
On 1 Sep 2004 07:12:39 -0500, Dan wrote:
Since you're obviously new here - and a dumb **** besides... Dan NB the Coulter-style family values we should come to expect from the right. h. _________________________________________ Zazen is good for nothing! - Sawaki Roshi |
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: homeless NB the Coulter-style family values we should come to expect from the right. By and large, most of the conservative political posters in this NG couldn't find a SINGLE Republican that would support their perspectives or behaviors. Any politician that supported such extreme positions and behavior would have a short career these days. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com