|
On 10 Sep 2004 02:12:45 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: On Thu 09 Sep 2004 08:56:46p, "llortamai" wrote in message : "Retarded Death Row Inmates 4 Bush" wrote in message om... dream on. You wish you could dream it was false, but the articles keep coming. Here's another one. http://weeklystandard.com/Utilities/...idArticle=4596 &R=9FCD2F192 Is It a Hoax? Experts weigh in on the 60 Minutes documents. Says one: "I'm a Kerry supporter myself, but . . . I'm 99% sure that these documents were not produced in the early 1970s." by Stephen F. Hayes 09/09/2004 7:20:00 PM {snippage} I wouldn't be surprised to find that 60 Minutes cast some lines about, offering to pay for similar information and by doing so, set themselves up for getting "werked"! If they turn out to be forged, it would be a further indication that 60 minutes was willing to take the info and run without validating it. Here's a suggested topic for a 60 Minutes expose on their own stafers: Blinded by Bias! -=jd=- And you're certainly not biased JD. |
"Kameron Spesial" wrote in message ... On 10 Sep 2004 02:12:45 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: On Thu 09 Sep 2004 08:56:46p, "llortamai" wrote in message : "Retarded Death Row Inmates 4 Bush" wrote in message om... dream on. You wish you could dream it was false, but the articles keep coming. Here's another one. http://weeklystandard.com/Utilities/...idArticle=4596 &R=9FCD2F192 Is It a Hoax? Experts weigh in on the 60 Minutes documents. Says one: "I'm a Kerry supporter myself, but . . . I'm 99% sure that these documents were not produced in the early 1970s." by Stephen F. Hayes 09/09/2004 7:20:00 PM {snippage} I wouldn't be surprised to find that 60 Minutes cast some lines about, offering to pay for similar information and by doing so, set themselves up for getting "werked"! If they turn out to be forged, it would be a further indication that 60 minutes was willing to take the info and run without validating it. Here's a suggested topic for a 60 Minutes expose on their own stafers: Blinded by Bias! -=jd=- And you're certainly not biased JD. It's pretty unlikely that 60 Minutes "ran" with the story without a fairly strenuous attempt to validate the documents. They might have been wrong and it might turn out that the docs are plants, but 60 Minutes is regularly challenged by all quarters and I've got a feeling that they go out of their way to vet anything they present as "evidence." |
Regarding the charge that the fonts prove the documents are fake:
BZZZZT! Try again. The White House distributed the memos ... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5952048/ .... and didn't question their authenticity is well taken. As for the font not being available in the 70s, the claim is that proportional fonts were not available until the seventies. http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics....%5Carchive%5C2 00409%5CPOL20040909d.html In fact, they've been around since the forties. http://www-1.ibm.com/ibm/history/history/year_1941.html A web of unashamed lies is unraveling at a very opportune moment. SMELL the desperation! Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A, Degen 1102, Degen 1103, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nospam" to reply) |
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... A web of unashamed lies is unraveling at a very opportune moment. SMELL the desperation! My sense of smell isn't that good. Aren't you in Kentucky someplace? |
llortamai wrote:
http://www.drudgereport.com/ 32-year-old documents produced Wednesday by CBSNEWS 60 MINS on Bush's guard service may have been forged using a current word processing program. typed using a proportional font, not common at that time, and they used a superscript font feature found in today's Microsoft Word program, Internet reports claim... Developing... Developing? Actually already DEBUNKED!!! Electric ball typewriters could do that, and the US government had lots of them. You guys are desperate and in total denial. Bush deserted and there is proof of that. |
|
Greg wrote:
BTW - Drudge is often right. Suuuuuuuuuuure, that's the guy who photomontaged Kerry besides Jane Fonda. ****ing neofascist slimebag liar!! |
In article ,
"Paolo Pizzi" wrote: Greg wrote: BTW - Drudge is often right. Suuuuuuuuuuure, that's the guy who photomontaged Kerry besides Jane Fonda. ****ing neofascist slimebag liar!! Kerry was there. Was on the list of speakers, is in the FBI reports. Nice try. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
In article ,
"Paolo Pizzi" wrote: llortamai wrote: http://www.drudgereport.com/ 32-year-old documents produced Wednesday by CBSNEWS 60 MINS on Bush's guard service may have been forged using a current word processing program. typed using a proportional font, not common at that time, and they used a superscript font feature found in today's Microsoft Word program, Internet reports claim... Developing... Developing? Actually already DEBUNKED!!! Electric ball typewriters could do that, and the US government had lots of them. You guys are desperate and in total denial. You sound pretty desperate. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Mr. Schnell wrote:
"Granger" wrote in message news:WF10d.136482$4o.10407@fed1read01... Ya right! It doesn't mean the original documents were fakes. The original documents after 32 years probably were faded, discolored and not legible. Huh? I have documents much older than that that are perfectly legible. There is no reason these 32 year old docs should not be legible. They were almost certainly reproduced using a Microsoft spread sheet in order to make them more legible. So why attempt to reproduce them exactly if all you want is to get the wording of the documents. Just explain, the documents have been retyped word for word for legibility. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com