"Sir Cumference" wrote in message
...
Mr. Schnell wrote:

"Granger" wrote in message
news:WF10d.136482$4o.10407@fed1read01...

Ya right!


It doesn't mean the original documents were fakes. The original
documents
after 32 years probably were faded, discolored and not legible.

Huh? I have documents much older than that that are perfectly legible.
There is no reason these 32 year old docs should not be legible.

They were
almost certainly reproduced using a Microsoft spread sheet in order to
make
them more legible.

So why attempt to reproduce them exactly if all you want is to get the
wording of the documents. Just explain, the documents have been retyped
word for word for legibility.

I have become disallusioned wuth American politics. Vote for Nader.