RHF wrote:

CBS Plans New Memos Statement
NEW YORK, 20 SEPT 2004
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in641481.shtml

CBS HAS NOT REVEALED WHO PROVIDED THE DOCUMENTS OR HOW THEY WERE OBTAINED.

WHO IS CBS PROTECTING ?

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}

HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?

WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}

* According to The Washington Post, the network plans to say
it was misled about the authenticity of the documents.

* The New York Times reports that CBS News officials met Sunday
evening with anchor Dan Rather, the reporter of the contested
story, to discuss the network's next steps.

* The Post and Times report that CBS' latest move comes after
Rather met in Texas with Bill Burkett, a former Texas National
Guard official who has been named as a possible source for the
documents.

* It was not clear if the network planned to apologize, the
Post reported.

CBS can't be trusted in any of this, no matter what they say at this point in time.

They, and Dan Blather were warned about the documents before they went to air with
them. Then they tried a bit of CYA, that didn't work, now they are falling back on
this story.

dxAce