Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote Jack Painter wrote: "dxAce" forwarded Frequencies for Antarctic comms: Palmer Station: 4125 - Secondary United States Antarctic Program (USAP) Field Parties, Have seen this reported as Antarctic comms before. 4125 Khz is an international maritime calling and distress frequency only. They might use it for calling as any maritime mobile station can, but it could not be assigned to a fixed land station by any country that is signatory to IMO and other maritime frequency agreements. No one ever stated that it was. The original poster ( I forget, was it WUN?, some southender anyway) implied that the station is assigned the frequencies he posted, and for some of them that may be true. But accurate logging on 4125 should be something to the effect like: "USAP Field Parties heard calling base" (or any station), etc, if it were accurate. He implies they are assigned that frequency by his inclusion of station-ID information that is never passed over the air. I am just explaining they are not, and listeners to that frequency have a nill chance of hearing Antarctica there since 200,000 ships worldwide use it for hailing and distress. Jack |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jack Painter wrote: "dxAce" wrote Jack Painter wrote: "dxAce" forwarded Frequencies for Antarctic comms: Palmer Station: 4125 - Secondary United States Antarctic Program (USAP) Field Parties, Have seen this reported as Antarctic comms before. 4125 Khz is an international maritime calling and distress frequency only. They might use it for calling as any maritime mobile station can, but it could not be assigned to a fixed land station by any country that is signatory to IMO and other maritime frequency agreements. No one ever stated that it was. The original poster ( I forget, was it WUN?, some southender anyway) implied that the station is assigned the frequencies he posted, and for some of them that may be true. But accurate logging on 4125 should be something to the effect like: "USAP Field Parties heard calling base" (or any station), etc, if it were accurate. He implies they are assigned that frequency by his inclusion of station-ID information that is never passed over the air. I am just explaining they are not, and listeners to that frequency have a nill chance of hearing Antarctica there since 200,000 ships worldwide use it for hailing and distress. They use that frequency. Simple enough. dxAce Michigan USA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #689 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #689 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #689 | Dx | |||
Question about military frequencies | Shortwave |