Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 1st 04, 02:44 PM
Larry Ozarow
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Last week the NY Times ran a typical
puff-piece article about BPL which looked
to be assembled out of FCC handouts and
industry white papers.

Over the weekend they had a sort-of correction
tacked on to an un-related article (don't remember
which one and I don't have the paper handy). The
gist was that the FCC/industry had taken note of
the ARRL objections and required suppression of
interference in what they termed something like
"critical" bands (again, don't remember the exact
phrase) - touted as a victory of government and
industry, cooperating to solve a problem, blah blah
blah. Load of crap.

Oz

Brenda Ann Dyer wrote:
"Mark Keith" wrote in message
om...


Also, I'm dubious that "notching" can really work. Both
for us, and them.




Notching didn't work in Japan, and Japan shut down all their BPL. Reason
being, you're dealing with square waves over several octaves of spectrum. As
anyone familiar with square waves knows, they are very rich in harmonic
output, and the first, third and fifth harmonics are not much less in power
than the fundamental. If they notch out 40m, you'll just get to hear the
third harmonic from 2.3MHz, and so on up the spectrum.



  #2   Report Post  
Old November 1st 04, 10:52 PM
Frank Dresser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Ozarow" wrote in message
news:WYrhd.1407$rZ1.148@trndny05...
Last week the NY Times ran a typical
puff-piece article about BPL which looked
to be assembled out of FCC handouts and
industry white papers

Isn't journalism amazing? Don't they ever bother learning a bit about the
stories they write?

Over the weekend they had a sort-of correction
tacked on to an un-related article (don't remember
which one and I don't have the paper handy). The
gist was that the FCC/industry had taken note of
the ARRL objections and required suppression of
interference in what they termed something like
"critical" bands (again, don't remember the exact
phrase) - touted as a victory of government and
industry, cooperating to solve a problem, blah blah
blah. Load of crap.

Oz


It seems they are still missing the biggest part of the BPL story. That is,
will it work reliably enough? A journalist doesn't have to be EH Armstrong
to see there's some technological problems with BPL.

Frank Dresser



  #3   Report Post  
Old November 2nd 04, 02:57 AM
Stephen M.H. Lawrence
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Frank Dresser" wrote:
| Isn't journalism amazing? Don't they ever bother learning a bit about the
| stories they write?

I'm sure that thought has crossed many a Republican's mind in the
last year or so....

73,

Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

"If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up."
- Anonymous


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.786 / Virus Database: 532 - Release Date: 10/29/04


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
Latest 50's Rock and Roll Shows Online Rockitradio Broadcasting 0 August 14th 04 12:20 AM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 private General 0 May 10th 04 09:39 PM
OLD motorola trunking information jack smith Scanner 1 December 12th 03 09:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017