Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last week the NY Times ran a typical
puff-piece article about BPL which looked to be assembled out of FCC handouts and industry white papers. Over the weekend they had a sort-of correction tacked on to an un-related article (don't remember which one and I don't have the paper handy). The gist was that the FCC/industry had taken note of the ARRL objections and required suppression of interference in what they termed something like "critical" bands (again, don't remember the exact phrase) - touted as a victory of government and industry, cooperating to solve a problem, blah blah blah. Load of crap. Oz Brenda Ann Dyer wrote: "Mark Keith" wrote in message om... Also, I'm dubious that "notching" can really work. Both for us, and them. Notching didn't work in Japan, and Japan shut down all their BPL. Reason being, you're dealing with square waves over several octaves of spectrum. As anyone familiar with square waves knows, they are very rich in harmonic output, and the first, third and fifth harmonics are not much less in power than the fundamental. If they notch out 40m, you'll just get to hear the third harmonic from 2.3MHz, and so on up the spectrum. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Ozarow" wrote in message news:WYrhd.1407$rZ1.148@trndny05... Last week the NY Times ran a typical puff-piece article about BPL which looked to be assembled out of FCC handouts and industry white papers Isn't journalism amazing? Don't they ever bother learning a bit about the stories they write? Over the weekend they had a sort-of correction tacked on to an un-related article (don't remember which one and I don't have the paper handy). The gist was that the FCC/industry had taken note of the ARRL objections and required suppression of interference in what they termed something like "critical" bands (again, don't remember the exact phrase) - touted as a victory of government and industry, cooperating to solve a problem, blah blah blah. Load of crap. Oz It seems they are still missing the biggest part of the BPL story. That is, will it work reliably enough? A journalist doesn't have to be EH Armstrong to see there's some technological problems with BPL. Frank Dresser |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frank Dresser" wrote:
| Isn't journalism amazing? Don't they ever bother learning a bit about the | stories they write? I'm sure that thought has crossed many a Republican's mind in the last year or so.... 73, Steve Lawrence KAØPMD Burnsville, Minnesota "If a man wants his dreams to come true then he must wake up." - Anonymous --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.786 / Virus Database: 532 - Release Date: 10/29/04 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Latest 50's Rock and Roll Shows Online | Broadcasting | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
OLD motorola trunking information | Scanner |