Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
= = = Telamon wrote in message
= = = ... In article , "Karl Graff" wrote: Please excuse any ignorance I am going to show- you have helped me a lot as I learned to DX and what kind of radio gives the most bang for the buck. What is the real deal with DRM? Are analog SW radios going away? Have any of you invested in a DRM capable receiver and how are they? Should I begin to move towards DRM and if so, what receivers will pick up and decode those signals? What are the limitations, or the cons if any, of DRM? Thanks for any info/opinions you are willing to pass on... It's a bad idea made to be something better through a hype campaign and wishful thinking. DRM is a con job. TELAMON, Good 'old fashion' (Tried-and-True) "Analog" AM International Broadcasting {Long Distance} may have it's FADE and Weak Signals. - Remember Analog Celphones ? DRM "Digital" AM Broadcasting AM International Broadcasting {Long Distance} has it's Signal Drop-Off. - Its Here (Can be Heard) "Great Sound" and then Its Gone [.] - Think of Digital Celphones ! DRM may be good and useful for In-Country 1000 Mile Broadcasting; but for "Around-the-World" International Broadcasting it offers no real advantage in Punching the Signal Through and Getting Heard. The Most Cost-Effective-Method and the Trend for Governments and 'others' who want to get their Message-Out to the Masses of other Countries will continue to be Internet Broadcasting "On-Demand" Streaming Audio that is THERE when the Listener Whats to Hear It; and Host Country Re-Broadcasting via 'local' AM and FM Band Radios; or via "In-Country" Shortwave Relays. ssi ~ RHF .. .. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Comparing Four Great Communications Receivers | Shortwave | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew | |||
Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew |