| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ...
"Karl Graff" wrote in message ... Please excuse any ignorance I am going to show- you have helped me a lot as I learned to DX and what kind of radio gives the most bang for the buck. What is the real deal with DRM? In my opinion, it's a solution to a problem which doesn't exist. There's the idea that there's a lot of people who would want to listen to SW radio, if only SW radio had better sound. I'll say that more people would listen to SW radio if only the programming appealed to them. Most nations are cutting budgets for SW programming. There's some hope that DRM might help with the penny pinching, if the digital modulation will work acceptably with lower transmitter power. I think you're right. I listen to SW because the programming appeals to me--and I suspect the current audience of SWLers is made up of people like me, who are turned off by what they hear on much of MW and certainly by what they hear on FM. If DRM caused the nature of SW programming to change, then it might create a new (very small) audience, but I suspect it would lose a huge chunk of the current SW audience. Steve |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Comparing Four Great Communications Receivers | Shortwave | |||
| a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
| Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew | |||
| Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew | |||