Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 11th 04, 06:34 PM
Bruce Robertson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rember the predicted death of Medium Wave.
What do you think revivied it to it's current robust state?

I think it was CONTENT!

Do you remember some of the technological "advancements" the
industry tried to institute in order to "compete" with VHF FM BCB?
(AM Stereo for one).

To broaden your listener ship, you need CONTENT.
Something people want, but can't get easily elsewhere.
------------------------------------------------

Here is a thought: In 10 years HF BCB could be the terrestile equivalent of
sattelite radio via DRM. (is that good or bad?) In my mind it is only bad
if content is limited.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparing Four Great Communications Receivers Mike Terry Shortwave 20 July 22nd 04 04:19 AM
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history john private smith Policy 0 December 22nd 03 02:42 AM
Means of building low quality receivers Joel Kolstad Homebrew 6 October 20th 03 09:52 PM
Means of building low quality receivers Joel Kolstad Homebrew 0 October 18th 03 10:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017