Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frightening the yaks, Dale Parfitt just had to say:
Probably correct Mike. Even though we are dealing with different areas of the FCC rules ( BPL falls under part 15). It seems in their latest rulings, the FCC is going to give more headroom to whatever inteference is caused by BPL. Looks like our best hope is that BPL is horrible technology and will likely be outmoded by WiMax, WiFi, fiber, Cable, Flarion etc. Well, I just had a wonderful, evil idea. Think for a moment of noise canceling headphones. All you need is a circuit that can invert a signal and insert it back within a degree or two of phase. What did you say was the highest frequency on BPL? OK, maybe it wasn't wonderful, but you have to admit it was evil. -- To reply, DO NOT remove spam from the return address! *************************** This calls for a careful blend of clever psychology and extreme violence. *************************** |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
NTIA Claims BPL Could Help Alleviate Power Line Noise | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Dx | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting |