Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's true, right now reception is not its all-time best. There is
also the 11-year solar cycle that plays a significant role in altering propagation, and we're shortly about to hit the "deep null" - or most mediocre reception. There are still good days, but they are fewer. Patience will be rewarded, though, when the cycle goes on the upswing again in 3 or 4 years. There is some evidence that the current solar cycle #23 may turn out to be shorter (end sooner) than the average 11-year period. If so, cycle #24 could begin in less than 3-years. http://www.spacetoday.org/SolSys/Sun...TwinPeaks.html ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
starman wrote in message ...
It's true, right now reception is not its all-time best. There is also the 11-year solar cycle that plays a significant role in altering propagation, and we're shortly about to hit the "deep null" - or most mediocre reception. There are still good days, but they are fewer. Patience will be rewarded, though, when the cycle goes on the upswing again in 3 or 4 years. There is some evidence that the current solar cycle #23 may turn out to be shorter (end sooner) than the average 11-year period. If so, cycle #24 could begin in less than 3-years. http://www.spacetoday.org/SolSys/Sun...TwinPeaks.html Very interesting, thanks. As I read it, though, this website seems to focus on the apparent, and maybe real, "double-peak" that the sunspot/solar cycle exhibits, rather than an actual shortening of the traditionally-accepted 11-year cycle. Either way, it is probably good news, as the peak is either longer or more frequent than originally thought, and therefore better for cool DX. This past peak was particularly fascinaitng from an observational astronomical perspective - there were massive clusters of sunspots crossing Sol's face on a regular basis, including some that were "naked-eye," that is, without magnification but using appropriate solar filters (NEVER NEVER look at the sun directly without the absolutely correct filter in excellent condition). Bruce Jensen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy |