Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark S. Holden" wrote in message ... wrote: Mark S. Holden wrote: Michael Lawson wrote: snip b) The R8B is it. There is currently nothing in the works for a replacement, like an R9. I'm sorry to hear this. I'd love to try a Drake with a DSP based IF. Well, they may not presently have a plan for an R9, but that doesn't mean it'll never happen. My guess is that sales of the R8B are still plenty strong. If R8B sales begin to taper off, this might generate enthusiasm for a successor. Steve I wonder what "strong sales" are for something like an R8b these days. If I were to hazard a guess, it's probably nothing like the "strong sales" for a Sat 800, some of the Degens and some of the Sonys. Due to the saturation point, I'd bet that the strongest sales in the SW business is for the Grundig 200, the hand crank one. You can find those everywhere, and people would buy them mainly for the interest in having an emergency radio, not the SW bands. This isn't to speak ill of the R8B, but just a recognition that the market for DXers and harder core broadcast SWLers is what the R8B is designed for, not the regular SWLers or casual listeners. A radio like a Sat 800, a SW2 or SW8, or one of the newer Etons or Degens would be more than enough for the average listener. I also wonder what R&D costs would be for a suitable replacement. Probably pretty steep. If Drake were to stay with SW long term, they'd probably do design work and sell it to another company, so that they don't have to give up the plant space to a new radio. Ten-tec is the only US company I can think of that's brought out new models in the last 5 years or so. I imagine they're spreading some r&d costs across shortwave and ham product lines. Ten-tec is also in the professional category as well, which is essentially radios for things like embassies and whatnot. I'm sure that they've gotten their money back on the development costs on their professional offering a long time ago. On the bright side, I think products like the Sat 800, and lower cost chinese portables will help expand the market for higher end radios. For a while, the portables helped to drive changes in the tabletops. The sync, for example, swept through the tabletop area after the Sony 2010 proved it's effectiveness. Now, maybe the tabletops will drive the development of the portables, with the Sat 800 being a smaller cousin of the R8B and the new Eton E1 being a similar descendent. It wouldn't surprise me if someone contracted out to Japan Radio, for instance, to build the circuitry for a portatop or large portable with DSP filtering, with the requirement that it be "smart" filtering with a minimum of human intervention. --Mike L. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe I am mistaken but weren't the first wind up radios made in Africa
and then they were made in China and of poorer quality too? And those wind up springs in the Chinese radios do not last as long as the wind up springs in the African made wind up radios? I think I once read something about that a few years ago. cuhulin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTD HRO Tuning Knob | Boatanchors | |||
WTD HRO Tuning Knob | Boatanchors | |||
WTB - MAIN TUNING KNOB FOR HRO-7 OR HFS | Boatanchors | |||
HRO main tuning knob ?? | Boatanchors | |||
high quality machined metal tuning knob for communications receivers | Shortwave |