Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() But yeah, the E/W orientation will work well for stations that are north or south of you (like tropical band stuff), but not so good for hearing things east or west of you (like from Europe or Africa or -depending on where you're at- relays like Sackville). Unless the antenna is a approx. 1/2 wavelength up or higher ( at tropical band= 150' or so) the end nulls fill in making even horizontal antennas near omni. Guess my question is, how are you connecting the twin lead- if simply connecting it to the balun, you have little more than a 300 Ohm transmission line, not an antenna. In fact, if the baluns were perfectly balanced, and the twin lead clear of metallic objects ( which would unbalance it) you would theoretically get zero signal. Dale W4OP Hey Dale, thanks for jumping in. Well, get the calculator out. The two freqs of interest to me are 9335 KHz and 11710 KHz, so I am going to work with something between those two numbers (10 MHz). If I am correct, 10 Mhz has a wavelength of 30 meters, which works out to about 98 feet. And I am working with 200 feet. (Maybe I should call this a long-wire antenna?) Question for you: what is an end null? And yes, I simply connected the 300-ohm to the baluns to the coax, to another balun, and then a third that plugs into my external antenna socket. And I a definetly getting a signal. Whatcha think? 300 ohm to the baluns?, then to the coax, to another balun? then to a third balun? I'm going hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. dxAce Michigan USA And what are you thinking, while going hmmmmmmm... ![]() your experience. Just wondering about the two other baluns. I can understand one, but not the other two. I'm gonna let Dale handle this one! Take it away, Dale! dxAce Michigan USA As above, If the baluns were perfect and the twin lead a fair distance from unbalancing metal etc. you would get NO signal. The fact you are getting some signal is due to the imperfect baluns. Get rid of the twin lead- it's acting as a transmission line not an antenna. Or at the very least connect both sides of the twin lead to one side of the balun and run a ground wire (as short as possible) to the other side of the balun- instead of the classic 9:1 balun, you'll have a 4:1 but it will work. Dale W4OP |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dale Parfitt" wrote in message news:A1Rrd.17054$%C6.6646@trnddc02... But yeah, the E/W orientation will work well for stations that are north or south of you (like tropical band stuff), but not so good for hearing things east or west of you (like from Europe or Africa or -depending on where you're at- relays like Sackville). Unless the antenna is a approx. 1/2 wavelength up or higher ( at tropical band= 150' or so) the end nulls fill in making even horizontal antennas near omni. Guess my question is, how are you connecting the twin lead- if simply connecting it to the balun, you have little more than a 300 Ohm transmission line, not an antenna. In fact, if the baluns were perfectly balanced, and the twin lead clear of metallic objects ( which would unbalance it) you would theoretically get zero signal. Dale W4OP Hey Dale, thanks for jumping in. Well, get the calculator out. The two freqs of interest to me are 9335 KHz and 11710 KHz, so I am going to work with something between those two numbers (10 MHz). If I am correct, 10 Mhz has a wavelength of 30 meters, which works out to about 98 feet. And I am working with 200 feet. (Maybe I should call this a long-wire antenna?) Question for you: what is an end null? And yes, I simply connected the 300-ohm to the baluns to the coax, to another balun, and then a third that plugs into my external antenna socket. And I a definetly getting a signal. Whatcha think? 300 ohm to the baluns?, then to the coax, to another balun? then to a third balun? I'm going hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. dxAce Michigan USA And what are you thinking, while going hmmmmmmm... ![]() your experience. Just wondering about the two other baluns. I can understand one, but not the other two. I'm gonna let Dale handle this one! Take it away, Dale! dxAce Michigan USA As above, If the baluns were perfect and the twin lead a fair distance from unbalancing metal etc. you would get NO signal. The fact you are getting some signal is due to the imperfect baluns. Get rid of the twin lead- it's acting as a transmission line not an antenna. Or at the very least connect both sides of the twin lead to one side of the balun and run a ground wire (as short as possible) to the other side of the balun- instead of the classic 9:1 balun, you'll have a 4:1 but it will work. Dale W4OP Hey Dale, thanks for coming back. Sorry it took me so long to pick up again. I hate to be dense, but *what* is a transmission line, and how does it differ from an antenna when hooked up to an antenna input of a portable radio? And why would I get NO signal? I don't mean to be disbelieving, I just don't understand. Where could I find more on these subjects? (ARRL Antenna Handbook maybe? I've been wanting one of those, but it seems to cover in exhaustive detail everything I don't seem to need.) Thanks in advance. Dave |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
SW pirates group is getting bigger and bigger | Shortwave | |||
Shut Up Twisted, Shut Up | CB | |||
The Late, Great ICOM R 71-A Group Has Returned | Shortwave | |||
A great short wave pirates group on internet | Shortwave |