Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
Old January 6th 05, 03:30 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



David wrote:

Here you go...

''For each of the three misperceptions, the study found enormous
differences between the viewers of Fox, who held the most
misperceptions, and NPR/PBS, who held the fewest by far. Eighty
percent of Fox viewers were found to hold at least one misperception,
compared to 23 percent of NPR/PBS consumers. All the other media fell
in between.

CBS ranked right behind Fox with a 71 percent score, while CNN and NBC
tied as the best-performing commercial broadcast audience at 55
percent. Forty-seven percent of print media readers held at least one
misperception.

As to the number of misconceptions held by their audiences, Fox far
outscored all of its rivals. A whopping 45 percent of its viewers
believed all three misperceptions, while the other commercial networks
scored between 12 percent and 16 percent. Only nine percent of readers
believed all three, while only four percent of the NPR/PBS audience
did. ''

[idiotic story snipped!]

Gots lots more if you like...


No thanks! It's quite obvious to me that a 'tard such as yourself did the study.

Nice try 'tard boy... PLEASE... don't try again.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #42   Report Post  
Old January 6th 05, 03:34 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



David wrote:

Prairie Home Companion is not an NPR show.


That may be the case, 'tard boy... but it is certainly carried on stations that
support National Propaganda Radio.

Don't forget to wipe...

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #43   Report Post  
Old January 6th 05, 07:31 PM
MnMikew
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David" wrote in message
...
Here you go...

''For each of the three misperceptions, the study found enormous
differences between the viewers of Fox, who held the most
misperceptions, and NPR/PBS, who held the fewest by far. Eighty
percent of Fox viewers were found to hold at least one misperception,
compared to 23 percent of NPR/PBS consumers. All the other media fell
in between.

CBS ranked right behind Fox with a 71 percent score, while CNN and NBC
tied as the best-performing commercial broadcast audience at 55
percent. Forty-seven percent of print media readers held at least one
misperception.

As to the number of misconceptions held by their audiences, Fox far
outscored all of its rivals. A whopping 45 percent of its viewers
believed all three misperceptions, while the other commercial networks
scored between 12 percent and 16 percent. Only nine percent of readers
believed all three, while only four percent of the NPR/PBS audience
did. ''

http://www.alternet.org/story/16892

Gots lots more if you like...

Misperceptions according to who? Again, a VERY suspect source.


  #44   Report Post  
Old January 6th 05, 09:45 PM
RHF
 
Posts: n/a
Default

STINGER,

You Got It Right !

Remember it is "DaviD" with Two Capital "D"s.
(-; For Dumb and Dumber ;-)
..
jftfoi ~ RHF
..

  #45   Report Post  
Old January 7th 05, 12:50 AM
Larry Ozarow
 
Posts: n/a
Default



RHF wrote:
STINGER,

You Got It Right !

Remember it is "DaviD" with Two Capital "D"s.
(-; For Dumb and Dumber ;-)
.
jftfoi ~ RHF
.

This from the gentlemanly chap who resents
it when people get "personal" when arguing
with him. Hypocrite.


  #46   Report Post  
Old January 7th 05, 01:04 AM
Larry Ozarow
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Stinger wrote:
il.

As for NPR presenting both sides of the political spectrum, I can think of
some liberal (Nina Totenberg, Mara Liasson, Daniel Schorr, etc. ) or
ultra-liberal (Bill Moyers) reporters with NPR -- exactly who do you say is
presenting the conservative point of view there?


Is Bill Moyers with NPR?
  #47   Report Post  
Old January 7th 05, 01:25 AM
RHF
 
Posts: n/a
Default

JD - I like your Logic and Reasoning ;-} ~ RHF
..

  #48   Report Post  
Old January 7th 05, 01:34 AM
Larry Ozarow
 
Posts: n/a
Default



-=jd=- wrote:




But most likely, it's on AFRTS because the price is right and NPR is an
established news source with a steady liberal slant that can be taken with
a grain of salt. Though, there is one change that you may find some
affirmation in. Used to be that when a TV was installed in a
military/federal office, it was immediately tuned to CNN and there it
stayed. The only need for a remote was for on/off/volume. However, where I
work, all the big monitors are now on (surprise!) FOX. The small monitors
are usually on the Weather Channel...

-=jd=-


Where I work they installed tv's in the cafeteria at some point and
they carried CNN for a couple of years, then suddenly switched to
Fox about 6 months ago. Then about a month ago they switched back
to CNN. Maybe Nickelodeon is next.

I don't think price is the issue. The two NPR news programs are pretty
expensive (at least that's what the local affiliate
tells you when it's fundraising time). Also I don't know what kind of
budget constraints AFRTS operates under. Your point that NPR provides
one of the only national-scale radio news feed is certainly well-taken
though.

Nonetheless, I think if NPR really were as biased as some on this group
think, some stink would have been raised in the Pentagon. They don't
have to offer four hours of news a day. Fox has a radio feed, on
satellite, maybe they can switch to that. Probably make some of the
posters on this thread happier.
  #49   Report Post  
Old January 7th 05, 03:14 AM
Larry Ozarow
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OK. I guess I don't really disagree
with what you're saying. While NPR may
be more or less a liberal outlet, or at
least have a liberal sensibility, its news
reporting is more complete than mostly
anything else in broadcast, and they do make
an effort to represent both sides of issues
which are controversial. Back when my company
was piping Fox news into our cafeteria, most
of their "news" coverage during the election
run-up seemed to be of the "John Kerry, threat or menace?"
variety.

By the way, even though RHF likes your logic
and reasoning (kiss of death right there),
your rooster analogy was
totally inapt. The rooster argument is a classic
"post hoc ergo procter hoc" while mine might
be judged a "non sequitur."
  #50   Report Post  
Old January 7th 05, 03:24 AM
RHF
 
Posts: n/a
Default

LM,
..
Thank God that "She" Gave me Two "O" Ears )
..
One on the "Left" to Listen to KQED, KALW, KQKE, KPFA etc.
http://www.silentway.com/music/bayfm.html
..
One on the "Right" to Listen to KSFO, KSTE, KNEW, KFBK etc.
..
And "Both" {Balance} to Listen to the Beautiful Sounds of
Mother Nature and Good Music: KDFC and KKSF . . .
http://www.classical.net/music/links/musradio.html
..
..
everyone - enjoy listening to your radios ~ RHF
..
ABOUT - SF BAY AREA RADIO :
..
AM = http://www.acken.com/project/communic/RadioList.html#AM
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...a/radio_am.DTL

http://www.tangentsunset.com/sfradio.htm#am
..
FM = http://www.acken.com/project/communic/RadioList.html#FM
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...a/radio_fm.DTL

http://www.tangentsunset.com/sfradio.htm
..
AM & FM = http://www.radioguide.com/cities/sf.html
http://www.baywideweb.com/Bay-Area-Radio-Stations.shtml
..
..

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Euronet Radio introducing regular Shortwave schedule Mike Terry Broadcasting 0 December 5th 04 12:13 AM
Euronet Radio introducing regular Shortwave schedule Mike Terry Shortwave 0 December 5th 04 12:13 AM
MobileDB-based shortwave schedule for PalmOS Robert Felton Shortwave 0 February 29th 04 05:24 PM
MobileDB-based shortwave schedule for the PalmOS Robert Felton Shortwave 0 February 3rd 04 02:40 AM
I wonder... mike Shortwave 8 September 5th 03 04:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017