Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Geoff Burginon wrote:
Which particular one of Collins receivers? What was the actual specified noise floor in figures? Frankly, I doubt you can get much lower than the WinRadio G313i -138 dBm. Read also this: "If I had to choose between a Collins 95S-1 and the WR-G303i (ignoring the obvious fact that the 95S-1 tunes to 2 GHz), I would take the WR-G303i." John Wilson, ShortWave Magazine (more details on http://www.winradio.com/pdf/g303i-review-swm.pdf ) And this in fact refers to the *predecessor" of the WR-G313i, which is a much better radio still - 5 stars by WRTH. My WR-G313i does indeed have the advertized -138dBm noise floor, and even the S-meter reliably measures down to that level - with 1dB accuracy. Not speaking of the ultra-sharp continuously variable IF filters down to 1Hz bandwith. Now *that's* what I'd call winning the contest hands down. ;-) Geoff Geoff: -143 dB was the noise floor of the R-390A, according to web info. Otherwise, of course, it was an old tube (32 of them!) boatanchor with mechanical tuning, weighed a ton, and had none of the amenities that modern digital radios provide. But it WAS quiet! -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:46:12 -0500, "Brian Denley"
wrote: My WR-G313i does indeed have the advertized -138dBm noise floor, and even the S-meter reliably measures down to that level - with 1dB accuracy. Not speaking of the ultra-sharp continuously variable IF filters down to 1Hz bandwith. Now *that's* what I'd call winning the contest hands down. ;-) Geoff Geoff: -143 dB was the noise floor of the R-390A, according to web info. Otherwise, of course, it was an old tube (32 of them!) boatanchor with mechanical tuning, weighed a ton, and had none of the amenities that modern digital radios provide. But it WAS quiet! -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html Thanks for the info Brian, sounds indeed awesome, I think I'd love to own this radio (and I thought I had no space left! :-). But frankly, I am still a bit confused about the noise floor. Yes I did see the Web pages which mention -143 dBm and one even says -147dBm, but some other pages specify less, for example -127 dBm, which seems to me more realistic, considering the sensitivity specs, which appear to be poorer than my WR-G313i (I have verified its sensitivity with a good signal generator, and it is actually about 2-3 dB better than specified): R-390A specs: http://members.aol.com/tcsopr/r390a.htm WR-G313i specs: http://www.winradio.com/home/g313i-s.htm How could a receiver with a higher noise floor have a better sensitivity? See also the original military specs on: http://209.35.120.129/mil-r-13947b.pdf and this table http://www.sherweng.com/table.html which shows the noise floor as -137dBm, i.e. about the same as the WR-G313i. Confusing, eh? I also note the dynamic range of the R-390A is rather poor: according to the specs on http://members.aol.com/tcsopr/r390a.htm it is only 52.7 dB (but this can't possibly be correct?), and on http://www.sherweng.com/table.html it is more reasonable 79dB (or 81dB wide-spaced), but it is still nothing compared to the 95 dB of my WR-G313i... Geoff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Receiver Reviews and Info including 'other' People's WebPages | Shortwave | |||
FA - R. L. Drake SW8 'portable' World Band Shortwave Communications Receiver | Shortwave | |||
STATUS : Grundig Satellit 800 Millennium World Band Receiver | Shortwave | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment |